Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.08s
District Court, N.D. California · Nov 25, 2024
Brown v. Newsom, No. 23-cv-04040, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101434, at *2 22 (N.D. Cal. May 1, 2024). 23 5. … Clark v. VIP 2 (quoting Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc., 211 F.3d 495, 498-99 (9th Cir. 2000)). 3 6.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWashington Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. United States Department of the Navy
612 F. Supp. 1243 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 21, 1984
Ainslie Corp. v. Middendorf, 381 F.Supp. 305, 308 (D.Mass.1974). … Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Brown, 600 F.2d 429 (3d Cir.1979) (“A showing of clear illegality is an appropriate standard to impose on an aggrieved bidder who seeks judicial relief,” id. at 434 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedGiuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2024
Usher v. … See Brown v. Alexander, 2016 WL 20 829071, *7 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2016 (quoting U.S. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown230 F. Supp. 3d 1036 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 27, 2017
Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 471 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474, 484 , 108 S.Ct. 2495 , 101 L.Ed.2d 420 (1988) (same); Madsen v. … See INS v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedInstitute for Fisheries Resources v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 2024
(emphases in original); see also Babbitt v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 26, 2018
Valdez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 372 12 F.3d 1115, 1117 (9th Cir. 2004); see also Gaus v. … See Lowerdermilk v. U.S.
Cited 0 timesUnknown243 F.R.D. 369 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 2007
Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp., 917 F.2d 1171 , 1175 (9th Cir. 1990). … It is true that many of the funds had similar fee structures and all had the same board and advisors. Yet, what might be an excessive fee for one fund might be fair for another.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBarnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada Nat. Bank
277 F. 110 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 15, 1920
Brown, 7 Wall. 205 , 19 L. Ed. 134 . … Sayers v. Burkhardt, 85 Fed. 246 , 29 C. C. A. 137 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 26, 2025
formatting in original). 12 Plaintiff attached three documents to the brief.3 The first is a document captioned 13 “Stipulations with Request for Award” from the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board … See Gunn v. Colvin, 581 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUrista v. Wells Fargo & Company
District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 2022
Jones v. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011); Daimler, 571 U.S. at 137-39. 4 The legal formality that makes it a “place of incorporation” rather than a “main office” is 5 irrelevant for personal jurisdiction.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLivermore Amador Valley Wastewater Management Agency v. Northwest Pipe & Casing Co.
915 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 1995
British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 950-52 (9th Cir.1978). It is not enough for the non-moving party to point to the mere allegations or denials contained in the pleadings. … See also, Anthony v.
Cited 2 timesPublished837 F. Supp. 1506 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 6, 1993
Alvarez-Mendez v. … Lynch v.
Cited 7 timesPublished191 F. Supp. 3d 1038 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 6, 2016
No. 13 at 7-8 (citing United States v. Carter, 465 F.3d 658 (6th Cir.2006) and United States v. Williams, 364 F.3d 556 (4th Cir.2004)). Not true. … Vollmer Co., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation
District Court, N.D. California · May 26, 2020
USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 574 23 U.S. 318, 325 (2015). Accordingly, the Federal Circuit’s claim constructions are binding on this 24 Court under stare decisis. See Ottah v. … SkyHawke Techs., LLC v. Deca Int’l Corp., 828 F.3d 1373, 1376 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownZayas v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department
District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 2021
See Torrisi 6 v. Tucson Elec. Power Co., 8 F.3d 1370, 1375-1376 (9th Cir. 1993); Class Plaintiffs v. City of 7 Seattle, 955 F.2d 1268, 1291 (9th Cir. 1992)). … See Staton v. Boeing Co., 327 F.3d 938, 959 (9th Cir. 2003). 11 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2024
Renee v. Duncan, 686 18 F.3d 1002, 1012 (9th Cir. 2012). … White v. Lee, 227 F.3d 26 1214, 1242 (9th Cir. 2000).
Cited 0 timesUnknownKelley v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
642 F. Supp. 2d 1048 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 2009
Fund v. Fed. Ins. Co., 307 F.3d 944, 955 (9th Cir.2002) (quoting Mitsui Mfrs. Bank v. Superior Court, 212 Cal.App.3d 726, 730 , 260 Cal.Rptr. 793 (1989)). … As an initial matter, plaintiffs appear to be citing to provisions of “Regulation Z,” the regulatory scheme promulgated by Federal Reserve Board pursuant to TILA. 15 U.S.C. § 1604 (a); 12 C.F.R. § 226 .
Cited 32 timesPublished682 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, N.D. California · May 2, 1988
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) appealed the IJ’s ruling to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). … See I.N.S. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedZayas v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department
District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 2021
No. 68) (hereinafter, “Initial Motion for Approval”) on 20 the basis that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors (“Board of Supervisors”) had not approved 21 the settlement agreement and therefore the motion was premature … Torrisi v. 21 Tucson Elec. Power Co., 8 F.3d 1370, 1375 (9th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks 22 omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownGreer v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
855 F. Supp. 2d 979 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 2012
Plaintiff was the “lowest performer across the board in these categories.” As such, Mr. … Stevenson v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna