Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.57s

  • Jacobson v. Future Motion, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 2022

    Defendant’s skateboards 24 appear to contain an alleged defect that causes the electric motor to shut off and wheels to lock 25 without noticeable warning, resulting in a complete halt that often throws the rider off the board … P. 42(a); see 1 also Bartling v. Apple Inc., 2018 WL 4804735, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2018) (citing In re 2 || Adams Apple, Inc., 829 F.2d 1484, 1487 (9th Cir. 1987)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sodipo v. Rosenberg

    77 F. Supp. 3d 997 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 12, 2015

    See INS v. … See Kazarian v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jewel v. National Security Agency

    965 F. Supp. 2d 1090 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2013

    Board of Univ. and School Lands, 461 U.S. 273, 286, n.22 , 103 S.Ct. 1811 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983)) (“Pottawatomi Indians ”). … California State Water Resources Control Board, 674 F.2d 1227, 1234 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting Larson, *1112 337 U.S. at 687 , 69 S.Ct. 1457 ).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bailey

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2026

    Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1278 (9th Cir. 2020) (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 15 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). … (quoting 18 Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Williams

    382 F. Supp. 3d 928 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 29, 2019

    Cooper v. Brown , 510 F.3d 870 , 942 (9th Cir. 2007) ; see also Primiano v. Cook , 598 F.3d 558 , 564 (9th Cir. 2010) ("The requirement that the opinion testimony assist the trier of fact goes primarily to relevance.") … United States v. Sandoval-Mendoza , 472 F.3d 645 , 655 (9th Cir. 2006).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 2020

    Additionally, the Board of Trustees consists of both employer and employee 25 representatives, who determine employee eligibility under the Plan. Both sides are at the table.” 26 Id; see also Boyd v. … In 17 Jenkins v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vincent Pastore-v-County of Santa Cruz

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2024

    Maney v. Brown, 91 F.4th 1296, 1302 (9th Cir. 2024) (quoting Stilwell v. City of 23 Williams, 831 F.3d 1234, 1240 (9th Cir. 2016)). … Pristavec v. Meno Holdings SPV, LP, 593 F. Supp. 3d 21 930, 943 (N.D. Cal. 2022) (quoting Brady v. Brown, 51 F.3d 810, 816 (9th Cir. 1995)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Echague v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

    43 F. Supp. 3d 994 · District Court, N.D. California · May 19, 2014

    .”); Gaines v. … However, the Ninth Circuit in Gelardi simply recognized that where a Plan Administrator “serves at the pleasure” of the Board of Directors or the employer, the employer and the Board have continuing fiduciary duties and liabilities

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • TrustLabs, Inc. v. An

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2024

    Katzir’s Floor & Home Design, Inc. v. … Defendant alleged in his proposed 17 counterclaims that he reported securities law violations to the Board of Directors and was 18 thereafter terminated. See Proposed Counterclaims (dkt. 92-1).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BladeRoom Group Limited v. Facebook, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 2020

    See PLCM Group, Inc. v. … Corder v. Brown, 25 F.3d 833, 40 (9th Cir. 1994); Bravo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Eric P. v. Directors Guild of America

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2020

    In Salomaa v. … In Lukas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hernandez v. Caliber Bodyworks LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 4, 2022

    “To ensure compliance with these mandates, a 19 federal agency called the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (‘Access 20 Board’) produces the” Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines … The “Access Board sets a baseline of nonbinding requirements” and the Department of 23 Justice (“DOJ”) “must then adopt binding regulations that are consistent with—but not necessarily 24 identical to—the [Access] Board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ayers v. Burton

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 29, 2021

    In Swarthout v. … See, e.g., 24 Powell v. Symons, 680 F.3d 301, 307 (3rd Cir. 2012); Ferrelli v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Aenlle v. County of San Mateo

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 8, 2025

    Alliance for 7 the Wild Rockies v. … (quoting Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 90 (1974))); a 16 || Maffick LLC v. Facebook, Inc., No. 20-cv-05222-JD, 2020 WL 5257853, at *3 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2023

    Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc., 156 F.3d 1154, 1158 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (citing Lockwood v. 23 Am. Airlines, Inc., 107 F.3d 1565, 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1997)); see Martin v. Mayer, 823 F.2d 500, 505 24 (Fed. … Bilstad v. Wakalopulos, 386 F.3d 10 1116, 1124–25 (Fed. Cir. 2004). For instance, in Tronzo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wang v. Zymergen Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2024

    The complaint alleged that 17 DCVC’s control of Matthew Ocko (an owner of DCVC and a member of Zymergen’s board) and 18 its control of Zymergen both subjected it to liability under Section 15. … See Gregorian v. 3 15 Izvestia, 871 F.2d 1515, 1520 (9th Cir. 1989); cf’ CMAX, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cristerna

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 2026

    Smolen v. Chater, 18 80 F.3d 1273, 1284 (9th Cir. 1996). Boilerplate and general findings are not enough. Treichler v. 19 Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 775 F.3d 1090, 1102–03 (9th Cir. 2014); Brown-Hunter v. … Nguyen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation

    694 F. Supp. 1427 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 1988

    Kings-borough (“Kingsborough”), former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive; and Richard B. … V.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Weinstein v. Katapult Group, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 2021

    Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. … Chiron Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Burgoon v. Narconon of Northern California

    125 F. Supp. 3d 974 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 27, 2015

    See Huey v. … Online v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.