Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.57s
Jacobson v. Future Motion, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 2022
Defendant’s skateboards 24 appear to contain an alleged defect that causes the electric motor to shut off and wheels to lock 25 without noticeable warning, resulting in a complete halt that often throws the rider off the board … P. 42(a); see 1 also Bartling v. Apple Inc., 2018 WL 4804735, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2018) (citing In re 2 || Adams Apple, Inc., 829 F.2d 1484, 1487 (9th Cir. 1987)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown77 F. Supp. 3d 997 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 12, 2015
See INS v. … See Kazarian v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJewel v. National Security Agency
965 F. Supp. 2d 1090 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2013
Board of Univ. and School Lands, 461 U.S. 273, 286, n.22 , 103 S.Ct. 1811 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983)) (“Pottawatomi Indians ”). … California State Water Resources Control Board, 674 F.2d 1227, 1234 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting Larson, *1112 337 U.S. at 687 , 69 S.Ct. 1457 ).
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2026
Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1278 (9th Cir. 2020) (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 15 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). … (quoting 18 Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown382 F. Supp. 3d 928 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 29, 2019
Cooper v. Brown , 510 F.3d 870 , 942 (9th Cir. 2007) ; see also Primiano v. Cook , 598 F.3d 558 , 564 (9th Cir. 2010) ("The requirement that the opinion testimony assist the trier of fact goes primarily to relevance.") … United States v. Sandoval-Mendoza , 472 F.3d 645 , 655 (9th Cir. 2006).
Cited 2 timesPublishedDimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 2020
Additionally, the Board of Trustees consists of both employer and employee 25 representatives, who determine employee eligibility under the Plan. Both sides are at the table.” 26 Id; see also Boyd v. … In 17 Jenkins v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownVincent Pastore-v-County of Santa Cruz
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2024
Maney v. Brown, 91 F.4th 1296, 1302 (9th Cir. 2024) (quoting Stilwell v. City of 23 Williams, 831 F.3d 1234, 1240 (9th Cir. 2016)). … Pristavec v. Meno Holdings SPV, LP, 593 F. Supp. 3d 21 930, 943 (N.D. Cal. 2022) (quoting Brady v. Brown, 51 F.3d 810, 816 (9th Cir. 1995)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownEchague v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
43 F. Supp. 3d 994 · District Court, N.D. California · May 19, 2014
.”); Gaines v. … However, the Ninth Circuit in Gelardi simply recognized that where a Plan Administrator “serves at the pleasure” of the Board of Directors or the employer, the employer and the Board have continuing fiduciary duties and liabilities
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2024
Katzir’s Floor & Home Design, Inc. v. … Defendant alleged in his proposed 17 counterclaims that he reported securities law violations to the Board of Directors and was 18 thereafter terminated. See Proposed Counterclaims (dkt. 92-1).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBladeRoom Group Limited v. Facebook, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 2020
See PLCM Group, Inc. v. … Corder v. Brown, 25 F.3d 833, 40 (9th Cir. 1994); Bravo v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEric P. v. Directors Guild of America
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2020
In Salomaa v. … In Lukas v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHernandez v. Caliber Bodyworks LLC
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 4, 2022
“To ensure compliance with these mandates, a 19 federal agency called the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (‘Access 20 Board’) produces the” Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines … The “Access Board sets a baseline of nonbinding requirements” and the Department of 23 Justice (“DOJ”) “must then adopt binding regulations that are consistent with—but not necessarily 24 identical to—the [Access] Board
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Nov 29, 2021
In Swarthout v. … See, e.g., 24 Powell v. Symons, 680 F.3d 301, 307 (3rd Cir. 2012); Ferrelli v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 8, 2025
Alliance for 7 the Wild Rockies v. … (quoting Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 90 (1974))); a 16 || Maffick LLC v. Facebook, Inc., No. 20-cv-05222-JD, 2020 WL 5257853, at *3 (N.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2023
Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc., 156 F.3d 1154, 1158 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (citing Lockwood v. 23 Am. Airlines, Inc., 107 F.3d 1565, 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1997)); see Martin v. Mayer, 823 F.2d 500, 505 24 (Fed. … Bilstad v. Wakalopulos, 386 F.3d 10 1116, 1124–25 (Fed. Cir. 2004). For instance, in Tronzo v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2024
The complaint alleged that 17 DCVC’s control of Matthew Ocko (an owner of DCVC and a member of Zymergen’s board) and 18 its control of Zymergen both subjected it to liability under Section 15. … See Gregorian v. 3 15 Izvestia, 871 F.2d 1515, 1520 (9th Cir. 1989); cf’ CMAX, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 2026
Smolen v. Chater, 18 80 F.3d 1273, 1284 (9th Cir. 1996). Boilerplate and general findings are not enough. Treichler v. 19 Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 775 F.3d 1090, 1102–03 (9th Cir. 2014); Brown-Hunter v. … Nguyen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIn Re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation
694 F. Supp. 1427 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 1988
Kings-borough (“Kingsborough”), former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive; and Richard B. … V.
Cited 37 timesPublishedWeinstein v. Katapult Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 2021
Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. … Chiron Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBurgoon v. Narconon of Northern California
125 F. Supp. 3d 974 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 27, 2015
See Huey v. … Online v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna