Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.82s
District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 2026
Sept. 1, 2021) (“When a plaintiff’s claims are preempted by the 17 LMRA, ‘the terms of the CBA control,’ including the CBA’s dispute resolution provisions.”) 18 (citing Brown v. … Truex v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAmparan v. Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc.
678 F. Supp. 2d 961 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 17, 2008
In that respect, the adequacy of TILA disclosures is to be assessed “from the standpoint of an ordinary consumer, not the perspective of a Federal Reserve Board member, federal judge, or English professor.” Smith v. … TILA is implemented by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (“FRB”) through regulations found in 12 C.F.R. § 226 and through the FRB’s Official Staff Commentary (“Commentary”).
Cited 9 timesPublishedVolkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Smartcar, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Sep 25, 2024
(emphasis in original) (citing 15 Brown Shoe v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962)). Second, the alleged market “must 16 encompass the product at issue as well as all economic substitutes for the product.” … (citing 17 Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325); see also Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325 (“The outer boundaries of a 18 product market are determined by the reasonable interchangeability of use or the cross-elasticity of 19
Cited 0 timesUnknownSecurities & Exchange Commission v. Bardman
216 F. Supp. 3d 1041 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 27, 2016
Id Management at Logitech also “informed the Board of Directors” in the “first half of January 2011” that Revue was selling poorly.” … Not only does the complaint allege that “Logitech management” informed the board of directors about a second price drop, that Wolf and Bardman’s “exposure list” included references to a “second price drop,” and Bard-man and
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 2, 2020
See Brady v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 2022
Defendant’s skateboards 24 appear to contain an alleged defect that causes the electric motor to shut off and wheels to lock 25 without noticeable warning, resulting in a complete halt that often throws the rider off the board … P. 42(a); see 1 also Bartling v. Apple Inc., 2018 WL 4804735, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2018) (citing In re 2 || Adams Apple, Inc., 829 F.2d 1484, 1487 (9th Cir. 1987)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 2020
Additionally, the Board of Trustees consists of both employer and employee 25 representatives, who determine employee eligibility under the Plan. Both sides are at the table.” 26 Id; see also Boyd v. … In 17 Jenkins v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2024
Katzir’s Floor & Home Design, Inc. v. … Defendant alleged in his proposed 17 counterclaims that he reported securities law violations to the Board of Directors and was 18 thereafter terminated. See Proposed Counterclaims (dkt. 92-1).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2024
Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 17 667 (9th Cir. 2018) (citing Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 945 (2007), and Magwood v. 18 Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 333 (2010)); see also Woods v. … Slack v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2023
Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc., 156 F.3d 1154, 1158 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (citing Lockwood v. 23 Am. Airlines, Inc., 107 F.3d 1565, 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1997)); see Martin v. Mayer, 823 F.2d 500, 505 24 (Fed. … Bilstad v. Wakalopulos, 386 F.3d 10 1116, 1124–25 (Fed. Cir. 2004). For instance, in Tronzo v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 7, 2022
Clegg v. … Brown v. Gen’l Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 (1976) (stating that Title 6 VII is “an exclusive, preemptive administrative and judicial scheme for the redress of federal 7 employment discrimination.”); Scott v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAmtrust International Underwriters DAC v. 180 Life Sciences Corp.
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2023
Zamani v. … of Managers, Advisory Board, 6 Supervisory Board or Audit Committee, board representative or board observer of a Company.” 7 AmTrust Policy p. 15, Directors and Officers and Public Co.
Cited 0 timesUnknown737 F. Supp. 2d 1018 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 25, 2010
Beach v. Ocwen Fed. … Section 1635 clearly states that a consumer, in order [to] exercise their right of rescission under TILA, need only notify the creditor, in “accordance with regulations oft he [Federal Reserve] Board, of his intention to
Cited 12 timesPublishedBladeRoom Group Limited v. Facebook, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 2020
See PLCM Group, Inc. v. … Corder v. Brown, 25 F.3d 833, 40 (9th Cir. 1994); Bravo v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2025
See ARCO Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department of Health & 21 Environmental Quality of Montana, 213 F.3d 1108, 1113 (9th Cir. 2000); see also 22 Caterpillar, Inc. v. … Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392 (1987) (“The party who brings the suit is 23 master to decide what law he will rely upon”); Franchise Tax Board v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCalifornia ex rel. Harris v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
894 F. Supp. 2d 1205 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 9, 2012
Brown, Jr., contacted Lockhart regarding his June 18, 2009 letter. … See e.g., Ward v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliams v. Affinity Insurance Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 2024
Ashcroft v. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 10, 2025
Harper v. Charter 7 Comme LLC, No. 2:19-CV-00902 WBS DMC, 2024 WL 3901469, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 8 2024) (quoting Amarin Pharms. Ir. Ltd. v. FDA, 139 F. Supp. 3d 437, 447 (D.D.C. 2015)). … Harper, 2024 WL 3901469, at *2; see also Retirement Board of 3 17 Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of City of Chicago v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownM.P.G. v. Antioch Unified School District
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 2023
(internal citation 9 omitted); Pagan v. Brown, 2009 WL 2581572, at *11 (N.D.N.Y. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997); Patel v. Kent Sch.
Cited 0 timesUnknown573 F. Supp. 2d 1244 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2008
Elliot v. Fortis Benefits Ins. … See Moreno v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna