Case law

Loh v. Future Motion, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 2022

Defendant’s skateboards 24 appear to contain an alleged defect that causes the electric motor to shut off and wheels to lock 25 without noticeable warning, resulting in a complete halt that often throws the rider off the board … P. 42(a); see 1 also Bartling v. Apple Inc., 2018 WL 4804735, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2018) (citing In re 2 || Adams Apple, Inc., 829 F.2d 1484, 1487 (9th Cir. 1987)).

Oswald

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 2026

Sept. 1, 2021) (“When a plaintiff’s claims are preempted by the 17 LMRA, ‘the terms of the CBA control,’ including the CBA’s dispute resolution provisions.”) 18 (citing Brown v. … Truex v.

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Smartcar, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 25, 2024

(emphasis in original) (citing 15 Brown Shoe v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962)). Second, the alleged market “must 16 encompass the product at issue as well as all economic substitutes for the product.” … (citing 17 Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325); see also Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325 (“The outer boundaries of a 18 product market are determined by the reasonable interchangeability of use or the cross-elasticity of 19

Mackey v. Bloomfield

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 4, 2025

Johnson v. Ryan, 55 F.4th 1167, 1180 (9th Cir. 2022) (quoting Sandin v. Conner, 17 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995) (citations omitted)). … Id. at 774 9 (citing Superintendent v.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bardman

216 F. Supp. 3d 1041 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 27, 2016

Id Management at Logitech also “informed the Board of Directors” in the “first half of January 2011” that Revue was selling poorly.” … Not only does the complaint allege that “Logitech management” informed the board of directors about a second price drop, that Wolf and Bardman’s “exposure list” included references to a “second price drop,” and Bard-man and

Williams v. Affinity Insurance Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 2024

Ashcroft v. … Co. v.

Edwards v. United States

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 2, 2020

See Brady v. … v.

Dimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 2020

Additionally, the Board of Trustees consists of both employer and employee 25 representatives, who determine employee eligibility under the Plan. Both sides are at the table.” 26 Id; see also Boyd v. … In 17 Jenkins v.

TrustLabs, Inc. v. An

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2024

Katzir’s Floor & Home Design, Inc. v. … Defendant alleged in his proposed 17 counterclaims that he reported securities law violations to the Board of Directors and was 18 thereafter terminated. See Proposed Counterclaims (dkt. 92-1).

California ex rel. Harris v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

894 F. Supp. 2d 1205 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 9, 2012

Brown, Jr., contacted Lockhart regarding his June 18, 2009 letter. … See e.g., Ward v.

Mitchell v. Atchely

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2024

Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 17 667 (9th Cir. 2018) (citing Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 945 (2007), and Magwood v. 18 Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 333 (2010)); see also Woods v. … Slack v.

Gamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2023

Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc., 156 F.3d 1154, 1158 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (citing Lockwood v. 23 Am. Airlines, Inc., 107 F.3d 1565, 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1997)); see Martin v. Mayer, 823 F.2d 500, 505 24 (Fed. … Bilstad v. Wakalopulos, 386 F.3d 10 1116, 1124–25 (Fed. Cir. 2004). For instance, in Tronzo v.

Briosos v. Wells Fargo Bank

737 F. Supp. 2d 1018 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 25, 2010

Beach v. Ocwen Fed. … Section 1635 clearly states that a consumer, in order [to] exercise their right of rescission under TILA, need only notify the creditor, in “accordance with regulations oft he [Federal Reserve] Board, of his intention to

Winns v. DeJoy

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 7, 2022

Clegg v. … Brown v. Gen’l Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 (1976) (stating that Title 6 VII is “an exclusive, preemptive administrative and judicial scheme for the redress of federal 7 employment discrimination.”); Scott v.

Amtrust International Underwriters DAC v. 180 Life Sciences Corp.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2023

Zamani v. … of Managers, Advisory Board, 6 Supervisory Board or Audit Committee, board representative or board observer of a Company.” 7 AmTrust Policy p. 15, Directors and Officers and Public Co.

BladeRoom Group Limited v. Facebook, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 2020

See PLCM Group, Inc. v. … Corder v. Brown, 25 F.3d 833, 40 (9th Cir. 1994); Bravo v.

Sanai v. Cardona

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 10, 2025

Harper v. Charter 7 Comme LLC, No. 2:19-CV-00902 WBS DMC, 2024 WL 3901469, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 8 2024) (quoting Amarin Pharms. Ir. Ltd. v. FDA, 139 F. Supp. 3d 437, 447 (D.D.C. 2015)). … Harper, 2024 WL 3901469, at *2; see also Retirement Board of 3 17 Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of City of Chicago v.

Montesano v. Sedgwick, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 6, 2025

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … Moore v.

M.P.G. v. Antioch Unified School District

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 2023

(internal citation 9 omitted); Pagan v. Brown, 2009 WL 2581572, at *11 (N.D.N.Y. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997); Patel v. Kent Sch.

Firsov v. Alaska Airlines

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2025

See ARCO Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department of Health & 21 Environmental Quality of Montana, 213 F.3d 1108, 1113 (9th Cir. 2000); see also 22 Caterpillar, Inc. v. … Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392 (1987) (“The party who brings the suit is 23 master to decide what law he will rely upon”); Franchise Tax Board v.