Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

2.19s

  • Floyd v. Singh

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 8, 2025

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 676; Leer v. … Gov’t Code § 905, and the plaintiff cannot sue until the claim “has been acted upon by the board, or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board.” Id. § 945.4.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Domino v. Kentucky Fried Chicken

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 1, 2020

    See Brown v. Whole Market Group, Inc., 789 F.3d 146 5 (D.C. … Moon v. Brown, No. 15-cv-01228-HSG, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21 106208, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2015) (citing Allen v. Gold Country Casino, 464 F.3d 1044, 22 1048 (9th Cir. 2006)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Banks v. San Mateo County District Attorney's Office

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2025

    Lopez v. … See Board of Cnty. Comm’rs. of 2 Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 3 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bess

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 13, 2025

    Mullenix v. … See Ellins v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Celano v. Marriott International, Inc.

    242 F.R.D. 544 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2007

    See Pickern v. … See Hiser v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Montesano v. Sedgwick, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 6, 2025

    Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … Moore v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kibunguchy v. Shnider

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 2020

    Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993). … According to the petition, Kibunguchy is in custody pursuant to the ruling of the Solano County Parole Board, which lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. 28 U.S.C. § 84(b).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Wells Fargo Securities Litigation

    991 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 1998

    See Wilber v. Owens, 2 N.J. 167, 177 , 65 A.2d 843 (1949); Town of Cody v. Buffalo Bill Memorial Assn., 64 Wyo. 468, 493 , 196 P.2d 369 (1948). … See, for example, Board of Education of City of Rockford v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lopez v. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center

    903 F. Supp. 2d 835 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 2012

    Executive Software North America, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of California, 24 F.3d 1545 , 1548 (9th Cir.1994); Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. … Plaintiffs rely on Torretti v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Balistreri v. McCormick & Company, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 13, 2023

    Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc., 277 F.3d 1166, 1172 17 (9th Cir. 2002). … Brown, 277 F.3d at 1172.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doe 1 v. AOL LLC

    719 F. Supp. 2d 1102 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 2010

    *1105 ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. … Keating v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Coxon v. United States District Court

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 3, 2020

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. … See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. 26 Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 284 (1979) (discussing the rare circumstances where courts will imply a 27 private right of action to enforce criminal laws).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • White v. Dr. Adeyamo

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 19, 2024

    Ashcroft v. … Malik v. Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 333 (9th Cir. 1994). Plaintiff 13 has not identified either the religion or the religious belief or practice that prohibits the 14 consumption of man-made medication.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Theodorakis v. DFINITY Stiftung

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 2024

    See Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 519 F.3d 1 Gian Bochsler is a “council or board member”2 of DFINITY. ¶ 16. Williams is a British citizen 2 domiciled in Switzerland. FAC ¶ 15; Williams Aff. … In Briskin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Payson

    27 F. Cas. 474 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 8, 1863

    No application was made to the board tor a confirmation of any other tract than that described in the deed. A confirmation of that tract described in the language of the deed was obtained. … Finnie v. Clay, 2 Bibb, 351 . In Vance v. Marshall, 3 Bibb, 148 , the magnetic, and not the true, meridian was held to be the proper guide for ascertaining the beginning of a survey.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Powell v. United States Dept. of Justice

    584 F. Supp. 1508 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 1984

    The contexts in which contrary conclusions were reached in Kiraly v. F.B.I., 728 F.2d 273 (6th Cir.1984), and Brown v. FBI, 658 F.2d 71 (2d Cir.1981) are entirely different from the situation here. … In Kiraly and Brown recent prosecutions had occurred and the security of victims and witnesses of violent offenses was involved.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Seals

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2026

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (cleaned up).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dekker v. Vivint Solar, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2020

    Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000) and Brown v. Dillard’s, 430 F.3d 1004 (9th 26 Cir. 2005). … Id. at 8 (quoting Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jewel v. National Security Agency

    965 F. Supp. 2d 1090 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2013

    Board of Univ. and School Lands, 461 U.S. 273, 286, n.22 , 103 S.Ct. 1811 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983)) (“Pottawatomi Indians ”). … California State Water Resources Control Board, 674 F.2d 1227, 1234 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting Larson, *1112 337 U.S. at 687 , 69 S.Ct. 1457 ).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In re Vaxart, Inc. Securities Litigation

    District Court, N.D. California · May 25, 2023

    Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, 564 U.S. 135, 143 n.6 (2011). … Ct. at 1102; see also S.E.C. v. Familant, 910 F. Supp. 2d 83, 94 (D.D.C. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.