Case law

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 22, 2019

J.L. v. … In any event, the Huang 27 plaintiff was injured while attempting to board the shuttle; again, not the facts of this case as 1 Orr v. Pac. Sw. Airlines, 208 Cal.

Firsov

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 5, 2026

Carrillo v. Monterey 23 Mech. Co., No. 24-CV-09202-LJC, 2025 WL 2615064 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 10, 2025) (quoting 24 Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. … A., Inc. v.

Goldberg v. Cameron

787 F. Supp. 2d 1013 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 4, 2011

(quoting Cavalier v. … See Swirsky v. Carey, 376 F.3d 841, 845 (9th Cir.2004). In Swirsky v.

Cooper v. Davis

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2020

Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 533-34 (2011) 9 (quoting Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)); see Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 10 740, 747 (1998); Edwards v. … Thornton v. Brown, 757 F.3d 834, 841 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing 19 Preiser, 411 U.S. at 500). Here, Petitioner explicitly states that he is not challenging the 20 denial of parole.

American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

146 F. Supp. 3d 1161 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 2015

Lahr v. Nat’l Transp. Safety Bd., 569 F.3d 964, 979 (9th Cir.2009) (internal quotation marks omitted) (deliberative-process privilege); see also NLRB v. … See Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820, 826-28 (D.C.Cir.1973).

D. (Labryssa) v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 20, 2022

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). 4 Federal courts “‘leave it to the ALJ to determine credibility, resolve conflicts in the testimony, and 5 resolve ambiguities in the record.’” Id. … Garrison v.

United States v. Sacco

337 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 17, 1972

In Wickard v. … It has sometimes left it to an administrative board or agency to determine whether the activities sought to be regulated or prohibited have such effect, as in the case of the Interstate Commerce Act, and the National Labor

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Collins

294 F. 742 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1923

By referring to San Francisco v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co., 166 Cal. 244 , 135 Pac. 971 , and Pullman Co. v. … Co. v. California, 162 U. S. 91 , 16 Sup. Ct. 766, 40 L. Ed. 903 , and Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Babcock, supra, where the taxes assailed were held to be valid. The contention will therefore be denied.

Godfrey v. Unknown

District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2021

See Godfrey v. Warden PBSP, Case No. 20-01381 BLF (PR). That 22 petition was dismissed for lack of federal habeas petition. Id., Dkt. No. 19. … Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2018) 2 || (citing Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 945 (2007), and Magwood v. Patterson, 561 3 || U.S. 320, 333 (2010)).

Bouri v. Stonebrae Homeowners Association

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 26, 2024

Luay testified that Bandali currently 5 lives in a boarding house in Foster City, while he lives in Elk Grove, California, but he sees 6 Bandali on a regular basis—weekly and sometimes twice weekly. … Golden Gate Way, LLC v. Stewart, No. C 09-04458, 2012 WL 4482053, 21 at *2 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2012).

Katz-Lacabe v. Oracle America, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 3, 2023

(quoting Brown v. Waddell, 50 F.3d 285, 289 (4th Cir. 1995)). … v.

Gonzales v. Charter Communications, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 24, 2020

See, e.g., Perez v. Performance Food 24 Grp., Inc., No. 15-cv-02390-HSG, 2017 WL 66874, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2017); Brown v. 25 Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 4:13-CV-05205 YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *2 (N.D. Cal. … Though Plaintiffs argue that Charter must identify individual witnesses, this 9 description is enough where the action is a wage-and-hour action and is representative in nature. 10 See, e.g., Brown v.

Purple Mountain Trust v. Wells Fargo & Company

District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 2022

See United States v. Richey, 632 25 F.3d 559, 566 (9th Cir. 2011). … DOCUMENTS RE SALES PRACTICES AND THE AUGUST 15, 2016 BOARD 1 PRESENTATION 2 The issue for these documents is relevance, and not a privilege.

Westar Marine Services v. Heerema Marine Contractors

621 F. Supp. 1135 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 18, 1985

Both are for a finite and predetermined amount closely related to the value of the tangible cargo on board the ship. … Clinton v.

Union Bond & Trust Company v. Blue Creek Redwood Co.

128 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 1955

Boone v. Templeman, supra note 5 ; Hayt v. Bentel, supra note 5 ; Kerr v. Reed, 1921, 187 Cal. 409 , 202 P. 142 ; Bank of America v. Ries, 1932, 128 Cal.App. 75 , 16 P.2d 1018 . 7 . McDonald v. Kingsbury, 1911, 16 Cal. … See Los Angeles Auto Tractor Co. v. Superior Court, 1928, 94 Cal.App. 433 , 271 P. 363 ; Veterans’ Welfare Board v. Burt, 1935, 4 Cal.App.2d 659 , 41 P.2d 587 . In the recent case of Nelson v.

Castrillo

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 10, 2026

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492. 17 V.

In Re Valence Technology, Inc. Securities Litigation

987 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 1997

Lenz v. … Cigna Securities, Inc., 12 F.3d 346, 353 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1019 , 114 S.Ct. 1401 , 128 L.Ed.2d 74 (1994); Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 41-42 (2nd Cir.1993); Howard v.

United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Fitzgerald

135 F. Supp. 2d 992 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 2001

In April 1991, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors (“the Board”) approved a General Plan amendment. … See SEC v. C.R.

Castillo v. Prime Hydration LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 9, 2024

The Court takes judicial notice of the EPA proposed PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation and State Water Resources Control Board. … Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc., 108 F. Supp. 3d 780, 787 (N.D. Cal. 2015) (citing Cal. 4 Chamber of Com. v. Brown, 196 Cal. App. 4th 233, 239 (2011) (citing Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 5 25249.7(a), (b))).

Institute for Fisheries Resources v. Hahn

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 2019

FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 147 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 143.