Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

0.44s

  • Rosales v. Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 2025

    Valdez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 372 F.3d 1115, 1116 (9th Cir. 24 2004); see also Gonzalez v. … See Joseph v. Vitas v 14 Healthcare Corp. of California, No. 19-cv-04987-AB(GJSx), 2019 WL 4053910, at *2 (C.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.

    169 F. Supp. 3d 970 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2016

    Brown, 564 U.S. 915 , 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). … hold titles and senior positions with CVS Health; (ii) CVS Health and CVS Pharmacy “share” certain executives, including the head of human resources and chief legal officer; (iii) the lone two members of CVS Pharmacy’s board

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Allan v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding

    730 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 27, 2010

    See, e.g., Collins v. FMHAUSDA, 105 F.3d 1366, 1367-68 (11th Cir.1997); Urbina v. Homeview Lending Inc., 681 F.Supp.2d 1254, 1259 (D.Nev.2009); Bloom v. … See Brown v. Option One Mortg. Corp., No. C 09-5705 MHP, 2010 WL 1267774 , at *4 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 1, 2010) (Patel, J.). The court therefore declines to toll the statute of limitations on Allan’s RE SPA claim.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brazil v. Dole Food Co.

    935 F. Supp. 2d 947 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 25, 2013

    Brown, 277 F.3d at 1172. As with so many of the other food misbranding cases filed recently within this district, Brazil’s case is “far less about science than it is about whether a label is misleading.” Jones v. … Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Servs., 277 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir.2002).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. Dudum

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 2021

    Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 905 (9th Cir. 2011); see, e.g., Johnson v. … Safe Air for Everyone v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States Ex Rel. Newsham v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.

    907 F. Supp. 1349 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 8, 1995

    See Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … Kelly v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carolina Casualty Insurance Company v. Rdd, Inc.

    685 F. Supp. 2d 1052 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 2010

    R.Civ.P. 56; Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Eisenberg v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 815 F.2d 1285, 1288-89 (9th Cir.1987). … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); Intel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Zhang v. YUAN

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 2024

    Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., 35 Cal. 4th 797, 807 (2005); see also Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 7 Cal. 4th 926, 931–33 (1994); Kline v. Turner, 87 Cal. App. 4th 1369, 1373–76 (2001). … See Swartz v. KPMG LLP, 476 F.3d 756, 766 (9th Cir. 2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Adobe Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation

    767 F. Supp. 1023 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 1, 1991

    Warnoek (“Warnock”), Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Adobe; Charles M. Geschke (“Geschke"), President and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of Adobe; M. … See Fine v. Rubin, 623 F.Supp. 171, 172-73 (N.D.Cal.1985).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 2022

    Brazil v. Dole 20 Packaged Foods, LLC, No. 12-CV-01831-LHK, 2014 WL 2466559, at *16 (N.D. Cal. May 30, 21 2014) (Judge Lucy H. Koh); see Werdebaugh v. … Plaintiff’s expert Browne then 7 summed the overcharges for all class members over all applicable months, providing damages 8 of $59.8 million (see Dkt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McGuire v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Director

    804 F. Supp. 1229 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 1992

    See Plyler v. … Plaintiff also cites Hernandez-Almanza v. U.S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Garner v. Phoenix Air Group, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · May 30, 2025

    DeFiore v. SOC LLC, 85 F.4th 546, 554 (9th Cir. 2023) (simplified). … See Getz v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miller v. Saul

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2022

    Brown-Hunter v. 24 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hawkins v. Zoegall

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 2022

    See Bishop Creek Lodge v. Scira, 46 Cal. … See LiMandri v. 9 || Judkins, 52 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Myers

    687 F. Supp. 1403 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 1988

    In Muskrat v. … If the deficit for any year exceeds the targeted amount, the Act mandates across-the-board spending cuts to reach the targeted level.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Vitale v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 2024

    ECF Nos. 16 (“Wells Fargo Mot.”), 17 (“WT Mot.”). 16 Defendants Browning Law Group APC and Yvonne Ramirez-Browning join in Wells Fargo’s 17 motion. ECF No. 18. Plaintiffs filed an opposition. … To the extent that the allegations in Plaintiffs’ § 1983 might be attributed to 6 Defendants WT, the Browning Law Group, or Ramirez-Browning, Plaintiffs fail to allege that any 7 of these Defendants is a state actor

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Calise

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 2026

    Valdovinos v. McGrath, No. C02- 10 1704-CW, 2007 WL 2023505 at *2 (N.D. Cal. July 12, 2007) (citing Brown v. … (Dkt. 8 No. 62, Order at 5, citing Long v. Dorset, 369 F. Supp. 3d 939, 948 (N.D. Cal. 2019), Caraccioli 9 v. Facebook, Inc., 167 F. Supp. 3d 1056, 1064 (N.D. Cal. 2016), and King v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Avenmarg v. Humboldt County

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 29, 2020

    See Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 24 691. … Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228, 231 (2014) 25 (quoting Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty., 391 U.S. 563, 26 568 (1968)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Oracle Corp. v. SAP AG

    566 F. Supp. 2d 1010 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 3, 2008

    See United States v. Sells Engineering, 463 U.S. 418, 425 , 103 S.Ct. 3133 , 77 L.Ed.2d 743 (1983). … See, e.g., Board of Ed. of Evanston Twp. High Sch. Dist. No. 202 v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Hollywood Firefighters' Pension System v. Wells Fargo & Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 2, 2024

    Larson v. … Fund v. Collis, 287 A.3d 1160, 1208–09 (Del.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.