Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.00s

  • Styling Plastics Co. v. Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.

    666 F. Supp. 1406 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 31, 1987

    In Italia Di Navigazione, S.P.A. v. M. V. … See Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/V Peisander, 648 F.2d 415 , 417 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981). 2 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pierce

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 2026

    Fleming v. … if the Board is unable to reach 3 a majority decision and elects to send the matter to arbitration.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bailey

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 2026

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). Federal courts “leave it to the 3 ALJ to determine credibility, resolve conflicts in the testimony, and resolve ambiguities in the 4 record.” Id. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (internal 7 quotation marks and citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lucasarts Entertainment Co. v. Humongous Entertainment Co.

    815 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 1993

    See e.g., Johnson Controls, Inc. v. … Dow Jones & Co. v. Board of Trade, 546 F.Supp. 113, 117 (S.D.N.Y.1982); Marisa Christina, Inc. v. Bernard Chaus, Inc., 808 F.Supp. 356, 358 (S.D.N.Y.1992); Life Music, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. United States

    115 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1953

    The resolution of the board of directors of *658 Victoria Land Company specifically directed that “all the assets of said corporation, real and personal wherever situated and of whatever character, whether tangible or intangible … Co. v. U. S., 268 U.S. 271 , 45 S.Ct. 503 , 69 L.Ed. 951 ; Kingan & Co. Inc., v. U. S., 44 F.2d 447 , 71 Ct.Cl. 19 ; Consolidated Paper Co. v. U. S., 59 F.2d 281 , 75 Ct.Cl. 215 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pacific Steel Group v. Commercial Metals Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 3, 2024

    were then pending; 12 WHEREAS, on July 2, 2024, the Court directed the Parties to meet and confer and 13 reconsider their sealing requests in light of the “compelling reasons” standard under Kamakana v. … Brown (SBN 202545) Email: david.costigan@dechert.com Daniel McCuaig (pro hac vice) 9 Nathaniel D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Datagate, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

    672 F. Supp. 1288 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 1987

    Barry, 805 F.2d at 871 (quoting NCAA v. Board of Regents 468 U.S. 85 , 109-10 n. 39, 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 2964 n. 39, 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984)). … Wilson Industries, Inc. v. Chronicle Broadcasting Co., 794 F.2d 1359, 1363 (9th Cir.1986) (quoting Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass’n v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Allan v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding

    730 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 27, 2010

    See, e.g., Collins v. FMHAUSDA, 105 F.3d 1366, 1367-68 (11th Cir.1997); Urbina v. Homeview Lending Inc., 681 F.Supp.2d 1254, 1259 (D.Nev.2009); Bloom v. … See Brown v. Option One Mortg. Corp., No. C 09-5705 MHP, 2010 WL 1267774 , at *4 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 1, 2010) (Patel, J.). The court therefore declines to toll the statute of limitations on Allan’s RE SPA claim.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Roe v. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2022

    Norcia v. Samsung Telecomms. America, LLC, 845 F.3d 1279, 1283 (9th Cir. 19 2017) (quotations and citations omitted). … See Craig v. 20 Brown & Root, Inc., 84 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lorenz v. Safeway, Inc.

    241 F. Supp. 3d 1005 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 2017

    Tibbie I, 729 F.3d at 1121 (quoting Brown v. Am. Life Holdings, Inc., 190 F.3d 856, 859 (8th Cir. 1999)). … Brown v. Owens Corning Inv.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bynum v. City of Pittsburg

    622 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 27, 1985

    In Haygood v. … Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345 (9th Cir.1981), aff'd on other grounds sub nom Kush v. Rutledge, 460 U.S. 719 , 103 S.Ct. 1483 , 75 L.Ed.2d 413 (1983).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 7, 2023

    Brown- 22 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Berry v. Sonoma County

    791 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 1992

    Defendants are Sonoma County; Sonoma County Board of Supervisors; Richard Michaelson, Sonoma County Sheriff, and Janet Nicholas, James Harberson, Tim Smithy, Nick Esposti, and Ernest Carpenter, members of the Board of Supervisors … Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Berry v. County of Sonoma, 30 F.3d 1174 (1994)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Capolupo v. Eills

    District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2020

    Corp. v. … See Board of County Comm’rs v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • B. v. City of Oakland

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2021

    Gov’t Code § 945.4; Harlow v. Cty. of Riverside, 295 F. … “The board 11 shall grant or deny the application within 45 days after it is presented to the board.” Cal. Gov’t 12 Code § 911.6(a).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Luna v. Davey Tree Surgery Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 2023

    Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River 20 Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 142 S. … in Galarsa v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hernandez v. Kijakazi

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 2021

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492-93 (9th 1 findings are insufficient.” Id. at 493 (quoting Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 (9th 2 Cir. 1998)). … Robbins v. Soc. Sec.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Davis v. Pinterest, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 2020

    No. 23 (“FAC”) at ¶ 1. 21 Defendant is an online platform that allows users to create their own virtual “pinboards” or 22 “boards,” by “pinning” images to their boards. See id. at ¶ 14. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra v. Azar

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 2020

    Oregon v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1118, 1129 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-92 (1965)); see also Mendenhall v. National Transportation Safety Board, 92 F.3d 871, 874 (9th Cir. 1996). … Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 143 (2000); see also Institute for Fisheries Resources v. Hahn, 424 F. Supp. 3d 740, 753 (N.D. Cal. 2019).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MN Investment Inc. et.al. v. Nguyen

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 2022

    Nguyen because, as Amour’s sole 6 board member and the holder of every officer position in Amour, Mr. Nguyen was the “guiding 7 spirit” behind Amour’s acts. See, e.g., Matsunoki Grp., Inc. v. … Lou v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.