Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.00s
Styling Plastics Co. v. Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.
666 F. Supp. 1406 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 31, 1987
In Italia Di Navigazione, S.P.A. v. M. V. … See Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/V Peisander, 648 F.2d 415 , 417 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981). 2 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 2026
Fleming v. … if the Board is unable to reach 3 a majority decision and elects to send the matter to arbitration.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 2026
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). Federal courts “leave it to the 3 ALJ to determine credibility, resolve conflicts in the testimony, and resolve ambiguities in the 4 record.” Id. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (internal 7 quotation marks and citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLucasarts Entertainment Co. v. Humongous Entertainment Co.
815 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 1993
See e.g., Johnson Controls, Inc. v. … Dow Jones & Co. v. Board of Trade, 546 F.Supp. 113, 117 (S.D.N.Y.1982); Marisa Christina, Inc. v. Bernard Chaus, Inc., 808 F.Supp. 356, 358 (S.D.N.Y.1992); Life Music, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. United States
115 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1953
The resolution of the board of directors of *658 Victoria Land Company specifically directed that “all the assets of said corporation, real and personal wherever situated and of whatever character, whether tangible or intangible … Co. v. U. S., 268 U.S. 271 , 45 S.Ct. 503 , 69 L.Ed. 951 ; Kingan & Co. Inc., v. U. S., 44 F.2d 447 , 71 Ct.Cl. 19 ; Consolidated Paper Co. v. U. S., 59 F.2d 281 , 75 Ct.Cl. 215 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedPacific Steel Group v. Commercial Metals Company
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 3, 2024
were then pending; 12 WHEREAS, on July 2, 2024, the Court directed the Parties to meet and confer and 13 reconsider their sealing requests in light of the “compelling reasons” standard under Kamakana v. … Brown (SBN 202545) Email: david.costigan@dechert.com Daniel McCuaig (pro hac vice) 9 Nathaniel D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDatagate, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
672 F. Supp. 1288 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 1987
Barry, 805 F.2d at 871 (quoting NCAA v. Board of Regents 468 U.S. 85 , 109-10 n. 39, 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 2964 n. 39, 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984)). … Wilson Industries, Inc. v. Chronicle Broadcasting Co., 794 F.2d 1359, 1363 (9th Cir.1986) (quoting Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass’n v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAllan v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding
730 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 27, 2010
See, e.g., Collins v. FMHAUSDA, 105 F.3d 1366, 1367-68 (11th Cir.1997); Urbina v. Homeview Lending Inc., 681 F.Supp.2d 1254, 1259 (D.Nev.2009); Bloom v. … See Brown v. Option One Mortg. Corp., No. C 09-5705 MHP, 2010 WL 1267774 , at *4 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 1, 2010) (Patel, J.). The court therefore declines to toll the statute of limitations on Allan’s RE SPA claim.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRoe v. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2022
Norcia v. Samsung Telecomms. America, LLC, 845 F.3d 1279, 1283 (9th Cir. 19 2017) (quotations and citations omitted). … See Craig v. 20 Brown & Root, Inc., 84 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknown241 F. Supp. 3d 1005 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 2017
Tibbie I, 729 F.3d at 1121 (quoting Brown v. Am. Life Holdings, Inc., 190 F.3d 856, 859 (8th Cir. 1999)). … Brown v. Owens Corning Inv.
Cited 9 timesPublished622 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 27, 1985
In Haygood v. … Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345 (9th Cir.1981), aff'd on other grounds sub nom Kush v. Rutledge, 460 U.S. 719 , 103 S.Ct. 1483 , 75 L.Ed.2d 413 (1983).
Cited 2 timesPublishedWilliams v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, N.D. California · Sep 7, 2023
Brown- 22 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.
Cited 0 timesUnknown791 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 1992
Defendants are Sonoma County; Sonoma County Board of Supervisors; Richard Michaelson, Sonoma County Sheriff, and Janet Nicholas, James Harberson, Tim Smithy, Nick Esposti, and Ernest Carpenter, members of the Board of Supervisors … Co. v.
Reversed on other grounds by Berry v. County of Sonoma, 30 F.3d 1174 (1994)Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2020
Corp. v. … See Board of County Comm’rs v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2021
Gov’t Code § 945.4; Harlow v. Cty. of Riverside, 295 F. … “The board 11 shall grant or deny the application within 45 days after it is presented to the board.” Cal. Gov’t 12 Code § 911.6(a).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLuna v. Davey Tree Surgery Company
District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 2023
Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River 20 Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 142 S. … in Galarsa v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 2021
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492-93 (9th 1 findings are insufficient.” Id. at 493 (quoting Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 (9th 2 Cir. 1998)). … Robbins v. Soc. Sec.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 2020
No. 23 (“FAC”) at ¶ 1. 21 Defendant is an online platform that allows users to create their own virtual “pinboards” or 22 “boards,” by “pinning” images to their boards. See id. at ¶ 14. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).
Cited 0 timesUnknownState of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra v. Azar
District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 2020
Oregon v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1118, 1129 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-92 (1965)); see also Mendenhall v. National Transportation Safety Board, 92 F.3d 871, 874 (9th Cir. 1996). … Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 143 (2000); see also Institute for Fisheries Resources v. Hahn, 424 F. Supp. 3d 740, 753 (N.D. Cal. 2019).
Cited 0 timesUnknownMN Investment Inc. et.al. v. Nguyen
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 2022
Nguyen because, as Amour’s sole 6 board member and the holder of every officer position in Amour, Mr. Nguyen was the “guiding 7 spirit” behind Amour’s acts. See, e.g., Matsunoki Grp., Inc. v. … Lou v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna