Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.81s

  • Andrade

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 27, 2025

    Farmer v. … Brown v. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Shear

    139 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 1956

    Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 , 56 S.Ct. 753 , 80 L.Ed. 1157 ; Iselin v. United States, 270 U.S. 245 , 46 S.Ct. 248 , 70 L.Ed. 566 ; and Ebert v. … Mulock, 212 Iowa 730 , 235 N.W. 45 ; Midwest Hotel Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 39 Wyo. 461 , 273 P. 696 , and Derby Club, Inc., v. Becket, 41 Wash.2d 869 , 252 P.2d 259 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Perryman v. City of Pittsburg

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2021

    Lopez v. … See Board of Cty. Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 16 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Weiss v. Cherry Pop Entertainment Group, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 2022

    Case No. 21-cv-04944-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. … Crisman also 6 || involved the alleged infringement of a photograph, and the analysis there applies across the board 7 in this case. 8 Consequently, default judgment is granted subject to the service

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • White

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 14, 2026

    Glendale Outpatient 10 Surgery Ctr. v. United HealthCare Servs. Inc., No. 2:18-CV-10550-SVW-SS, 2019 WL 8888305, 11 at *1 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2019) (quoting Trevizo v. Webster, No. … Washington v. City of Glendale Police Dep't, No. 2:18-CV-06519- 15 CBM(MAA), 2019 WL 13243998, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2019) (citing Cafasso v. Gen. 16 Dynamics C4 Sys., 637 F.3d 1047, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2011)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2020

    Brown Jordan Int’l, Inc. v. Mind's Eye Interiors, Inc., 236 F. 3 Supp. 2d 1152, 1154 (D. Haw. 2002); Lockheed Missile & Space Co., Inc. v. … Short v. 26 Brown, 893 F.3d 671, 675 (9th Cir. 2018).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission

    177 F. Supp. 2d 1011 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 2001

    See United States v. … In 1998-99, ridership was approximately 20 million annual boardings below what it was in 1982-83. Id.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hendon v. Burton

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 2023

    Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 21 667 (9th Cir. 2018) (citing Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 945 (2007), and Magwood v. 22 Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 333 (2010)); see also Woods v. … Slack v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Joey v. Robertson

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 2022

    Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 533-34 (2011) 3 (quoting Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)); see Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 4 740, 747 (1998); Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 648 (1997); Preiser v. … Thornton v. Brown, 757 F.3d 834, 841 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing 13 Preiser, 411 U.S. at 500).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garcia v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.

    78 F. Supp. 3d 1125 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 2015

    See Klein v. … See Maxwell v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Congdon v. Uber Techs., Inc.

    291 F. Supp. 3d 1012 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 2018

    See Hanon v. … August of Browne George Ross, LLP, and Mark A. Morrison of Morrison and Associates as class counsel. This Order terminates Docket Numbers 108, 109, and 114. IT IS SO ORDERED.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nehmer v. US Veterans Administ

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 5, 2020

    Nehmer v. U.S. Veterans’ Admin., 118 F.R.D. 113, 25 116 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 1987). … Alabama v. North Carolina, 560 U.S. 330, 346 (2010); Air France v. Saks, 15 470 U.S. 392, 396 (1985); Crestview Cemetery Ass’n. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mazor v. Shelton

    637 F. Supp. 330 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 18, 1986

    Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 639-40 , 94 S.Ct. 791, 796 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974). … In Whelehan v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Acme Breweries v. Brannan

    109 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 1952

    In United States v. … Johnson Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm., 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 690 , 693; Irwin v. Simmons, 2 Cir., *118 140 F.2d 558, 560 ; Andrews v. Com’r of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d. 314, 317 ; Hoffman v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lucasarts Entertainment Co. v. Humongous Entertainment Co.

    815 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 1993

    See e.g., Johnson Controls, Inc. v. … Dow Jones & Co. v. Board of Trade, 546 F.Supp. 113, 117 (S.D.N.Y.1982); Marisa Christina, Inc. v. Bernard Chaus, Inc., 808 F.Supp. 356, 358 (S.D.N.Y.1992); Life Music, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Lockyer v. United States Forest Service

    465 F. Supp. 2d 917 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2006

    Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. United States Forest Serv., 137 F.3d 1372 , 1376 (9th Cir.1998)_(citations omitted); see also Save the Yaak Comm. v. … Lands Council v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • V5 Systems, Inc. v. Far

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2022

    Accordingly, 12 plaintiff’s objections will not be deemed waived.”); Kanawi v. Bechtel Corp., No. C 06-05566 13 CRB (EDL), 2008 WL 4642168, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2008); Brown v. Stroud, No. … See, e.g., 3 || Anderson v. Air W., Inc., 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Starratt v. Fermented Sciences, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 2023

    Brown v. Natures Path Foods, Inc., No. 21-CV-05132-HSG, 2022 WL 4 717816, at *6, n.15 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2022). … See Brown, 2022 WL 717816, at *6, n.15. 10 C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Betty Hussein-v-Marin General Hospital

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 9, 2025

    Navarro v. … Plaintiff complains that going before the 13 Adjustment Board means there is no option of arbitration, but a party can still choose to either go 14 to the Adjustment Board or arbitration. (Pl.’s Opp’n at 1-2.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cabrera

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2026

    West v. … Cal. 1997) (finding that 14 due process requires no more than notice and a post-deprivation grievance process); Torres v. 15 Brown, 2016 WL 524804, at *3 (E.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.