Case law

Yu An v. Napolitano

15 F. Supp. 3d 976 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 2014

On March 31, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Form EOIR-29, Notice of Appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). … Jang v.

Wilson v. Leigh Law Group, P.C, (LLG)

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 2020

(See Wilson V Order, filed July 14, 2020, at 4:6-7 (quoting Schmidt 6 v. … Any current or former employees or board members of Mt. Diablo; 7 c.

Performance Plus Fund, Ltd. v. Winfield & Co., Inc.

443 F. Supp. 1188 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1977

See, e. g., Ray v. Hasley, 214 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1954); Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. … The board had no communications with Hopkins or INA. They relied solely upon the advice of Courtley and their attorneys with regard to the interpretation and adequacy of the bonds. 142.

Stebbins v. Doe

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 2024

Axiom Foods, Inc. v. … See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v.

J. C. Millett Co. v. Distillers Distributing Corp.

185 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 1960

Co. v. Go-lightly, 8 Cir., 1938, 94 F.2d 316 ; Root v. United States, 5 Cir., 1936, 85 F.2d 612 ; Smith v. Kent, 5 Cir., 1935, 79 F.2d 129 ; American Surety Co. of New York v. … Co. v. Wharton, 8 Cir., 1933, 63 F.2d 378 ; McSwain v. County Board of Education, D. C.E.D.Tenn.1956, 138 F.Supp. 570 .

Soto v. Future Motion, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2021

Defendant then 8 replaced the battery circuit, tested the board, and shipped it back to Plaintiff. … PS v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins.

Digby Adler Group LLC v. Image Rent a Car, Inc.

79 F. Supp. 3d 1095 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2015

Though the bylaws require a board of directors with at least three directors, Image never had a board of directors. Id. *1100 Ex. 13 at 2. … See His & Her Corp. v.

Samsara Inc. v. Motive Technologies Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2024

Brown, MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph G. Petrosinelli, C. Bryan Wilson, Angela Pyo, Jack H. … Samsara simply cannot press that clause across the board against its customers while simultaneously claiming that the Northern District is inconvenient here.

Bailey v. LinkedIn Corporation

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2021

Oneok, Inc. v. … Armas v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., No. 5:17-CV-06909-EJD, 2019 WL 3323057, at *2 18 (N.D. Cal. July 24, 2019) (citing Ammons v.

Altmann v. Television Signal Corp.

849 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 1994

Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507, 513 , 96 S.Ct. 1029, 1033 , 47 L.Ed.2d 196 (1976). The government’s general regulation of a private industry is not enough, in itself, to establish state action. … Viacom International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 828 F.Supp. 741, 744 (N.D.Cal1993) (citing San Diego Committee v. Governing Board, 790 F.2d 1471 (9th Cir.1986)).

Leach v. Tesla, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2024

Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 4:13-CV-05205 25 YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2014). … Gherebi v.

Diem v. City and County of San Francisco

686 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 1988

Padway v. … Counts IV, V, and VII — Title VII.

Gelber v. City of Willits

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 23, 2023

Brown v. Contra Costa Cty., 13 No. C 12-1923 PJH, 2014 WL 1347680, at *8 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2014) (citing Clouthier v. Cty. of 14 Contra Costa, 591 F.3d 1232, 1249-50 (9th Cir. 2010)). … See Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 11 Cal. 5th 204, 213 (2021), reh’g denied (May 12, 2021) 6 (“Duty is not universal; not every defendant owes every plaintiff a duty of care.

West Coast Construction Co. v. Oceano Sanitary District

311 F. Supp. 378 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 8, 1970

In Flast v. … Concedediy, the District Board of Directors could be forced into increasing the tax rate in order to meet the District’s financial obligations.

People ex rel. Lockyer v. United States Forest Service

465 F. Supp. 2d 917 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2006

Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. United States Forest Serv., 137 F.3d 1372 , 1376 (9th Cir.1998)_(citations omitted); see also Save the Yaak Comm. v. … Lands Council v.

Elvira Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 2019

Ryan v. Comm'r 25 of Soc. … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 15 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015). Specifically, the ALJ “simply stated her non-credibility 16 conclusion and then summarized the medical evidence supporting her RFC determination.

eBay Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc.

608 F. Supp. 2d 1156 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 24, 2009

The test for venue over a corporation under § 1391(b)(1) essentially mirrors the test for personal jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (c); Jonathan Browning, Inc. v. Venetian Casino Resort, LLC, No. … M/S Bremen v.

Gerlinger v. Amazon. Com, Inc.

311 F. Supp. 2d 838 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 2004

Brown, 936 F.2d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir.1991) Defendants propose several analyses as to why this provision is not illegal. … As a matter of law, “foreclosure of a de minimis share of the market will not tend ‘substantially to lessen competition.’ ” Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 329 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

United States v. Arteaga-Centeno

365 F. Supp. 3d 1023 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 4, 2019

Under the Ninth Circuit's recent opinion in Karingithi v. … Karingithi v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 2019).

Sweet v. Cardona

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 2020

Independence Mining Co. v. Babbitt, 105 F.3d 502, 511 (9th Cir. 1997); 21 Thompson v. U.S. … See, e.g., 17 Lederman v.