Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
0.66s
Contreras v. Corinthian Vigor Insurance Brokerage, Inc.
103 F. Supp. 2d 1180 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 2000
See Dunlop v. … V.
Cited 9 timesPublishedChung v. County of Santa Clara
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 12, 2022
Baker v. … See MTD at 11 9:8-11:25 (citing Weintraub v. Board of Educ., 593 F.3d 196 (2d Cir. 2010); Sacha v. Sedita, No. 12 09-CV-1119S, 2012 WL 5207528 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 22, 2012); Foley v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 2019
De Long v. … Ou-Young v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown6 F. Supp. 3d 1028 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 2013
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and various federal courts have weighed in on this question, with varying results. … Hosh, at 378, 381; see Demore v.
Cited 2 timesPublished68 F. Supp. 3d 1113 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 12, 2014
Under the holding of Terry v. … United States v. Brown, No. 14-CR-20007, 2014 WL 3924635 , at *2 (C.D.Ill. Aug. 11, 2014) appears to have reached the same con-elusion, but it may have done so in dicta.
Cited 3 timesPublished549 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 1982
People v. … There, the defendant had sought to introduce the statement of one Sylvia Brown, who had claimed her fifth amendment privilege, through the testimony of a private investigator who had heard Brown’s statement.
Cited 15 timesPublished30 F. Supp. 2d 1231 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1998
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 511 , 95 S.Ct. 2197 ); Automobile Workers v. … Sierra Club v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOperating Engineers v. United States
District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2023
Addisu v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 198 F.3d 1130, 1134 (9th Cir. 2000). … Koff v. United States, 3 F.3d 9 1297, 1298 (9th Cir. 1993) (citation omitted); see also Hazel v. Comm’r, 95 T.C.M.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHaralson v. United Airlines, Inc.
224 F. Supp. 3d 928 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2016
.”); Valles v. … Landers v.
Cited 25 timesPublished391 F. Supp. 3d 946 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 17, 2019
Given the USPTO Director has instituted review of Apple's first two petitions, and given that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") must now issue final written decisions as to every ground raised in the instituted petition … See Knievel v.
Cited 19 timesPublished843 F. Supp. 1329 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 1994
City of Los Angeles v. … V. Plaintiffs’ State Law Claims Dr.
Cited 55 timesPublishedLam Research Corp. v. Schunk Semiconductor
65 F. Supp. 3d 863 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2014
See Brown v. Toscano, 630 F.Supp.2d 1342, 1346 (S.D.Fla.2008) (“Defendants did not proffer any facts or explanation supporting their contention that they will likely prevail on the infringement issue.... … See, e.g., Real v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHarrington III v. Pinterest, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2020
No. 23 (“FAC”) at ¶ 1. 20 Defendant Pinterest, Inc. is an online platform that allows users to create their own virtual 21 “pinboards” or “boards,” by “pinning” images to their boards. See id. at ¶ 14. … See Harrington III v. 17 Pinterest, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-05290-EJD (N.D. Cal.).
Cited 0 timesUnknown835 F. Supp. 2d 762 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 2011
Theofel v. Farey-Jones, 359 F.3d 1066, 1072-1073 (9th Cir.2004). … The plaintiff contends that the emails are covered by the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, Gov.Code section 3500 et seq., which ensures public employees’ right to engage in a wide range of union-related activities without fear of
Cited 4 timesPublishedFoster v. United Continental Holdings, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2021
Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior Court, 83 Cal. App. 4th 523, 13 549 (2000). So too for the allegation that United’s CEO has a position on the United Holdings 14 board. … Some overlap in board officers and management personnel does not undermine the 15 entities’ formal separation. Id. at 548-49; see also Ranza v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGhafi Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, N.D. California · May 27, 2025
This includes parole decisions, 24 which are discretionary. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5)(A); see also Vasquez Romero v. … See Patel v. Reno, 134 F.3d 929, 931 (9th Cir. 1997) (requiring a 10 nondiscretionary duty for mandamus relief to be proper); R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 2023
v. … Smolen, 80 F.3d at 1288 (quoting Brown v. Heckler, 19 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoards of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust of Northern California v. Levering
District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 2021
People v. Eastburn, 12 189 Cal. … See Khoja v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownContest Promotions, LLC v. City & County of San Francisco
100 F. Supp. 3d 835 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 22, 2015
On July 8, 2014, the City’s Board of Supervisors approved the settlement and Contest Promotions made an initial payment of $150,000. Id. ¶24. II. … Ward v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2022
Corp. v. … , motor starters, motor controllers . . . asbestos arc chutes, ebony 10 board, phenolic materials, paper, wire and cable[,] . . . pumps, valves, and turbines.”
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna