Case law

Golden Gate Restaurant Ass'n v. City of San Francisco

535 F. Supp. 2d 968 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 26, 2007

BACKGROUND In 2006, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed, and the Mayor signed into law, the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance (the “Ordinance”). … Rutledge v.

Chastain v. Howard

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 9, 2024

Navellier v. Sletten, 29 Cal. 4th 82, 89 (2002). … City of Cotati v.

White v. PayPal, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2020

Case No. 19-cv-08015-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE 9 v. … Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 284 (1979) (discussing the very limited circumstances 1 Magistrate Judge Ryu recommends that this case be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject 2 || matter jurisdiction. 3

Calvary Chapel San Jose v. Cody

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2020

On August 11, 2020, the 22 County Board of Supervisors adopted Urgency Ordinance No. … Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 10 899, 903 (9th Cir. 2012). Irreparable injury alone, without a showing of great and immediate need, 11 is not enough. Younger, 401 U.S. at 46.

H.C. Elliott, Inc. v. Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

663 F. Supp. 1016 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 2, 1987

See Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. … Hummell v. S.E. Rykoff & Co., 634 F.2d 446, 453 (9th Cir.1980).

Rojas v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 6, 2022

West v. … Brown v. Cal. Dep't of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009). 3 17 Accordingly, Plaintiff may not bring his claims against the CDCR in federal court.

Athletics Investment Group, LLC v. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 7, 2022

(See Pet. ¶¶ 18-19, 71). 20 In particular, § 42301 provides that, where a district board establishes a "permit system," 21 the board shall "[p]rohibit the issuance of a permit" unless it is satisfied the applicant's … See Rains v.

Del Campo v. Kennedy

491 F. Supp. 2d 891 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 2006

Both chapters are local option schemes that leave the decision to implement such diversion programs to the county board of supervisors, conditioned on the approval of the district attor *900 ney, in order to meet the individual … The statutory scheme is such that the board of supervisors within each county is responsible for finding funding for the diversion program and ratifying its implementation. Cal.Penal Code § 1001.60. .

Bot M8 LLC v. Sony Corporation Of America

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 27, 2020

Ashcroft 16 v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … PageMelding, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc., No. C 11-06263 WHA, 2012 WL 851574, 26 at *2 (N.D. Cal.

La Terra Fina USA, LLC v. Resers Fine Foods, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 2024

Kearns v. … The 9 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cannot set a new legal standard. See Schlafly v. Saint Louis 10 Brewery, LLC, 909 F.3d 420, 423 (Fed.

Purple Mountain Trust v. Wells Fargo & Company

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 10, 2020

Sloan, other officers, and the former chairman of its board of directors, Stephen Sanger. … Fund v.

Citizens for Free Speech, LLC v. County of Alameda

194 F. Supp. 3d 968 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 2016

Smith v. Univ. of Wash. … Travel v.

Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 20, 2019

Octane Fitness, LLC v. … Kamakana v.

Dogherra v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

484 F. Supp. 396 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 22, 1980

purportedly is contrary to this court’s August 10th ruling. 1 In addition to citing Ness , defendant now strenuously contends plaintiff had other remedies available to her: (1) a proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board … Clayton v. ITT Gilfallan, Nos. 77-2756, 77-2763, Slip Op. at 3356 n. 3 (Sept. 4, 1979); Margetta v. Pam Pam Corp., 501 F.2d 179, 180 (9th Cir. 1974).

Northwestern Pacific Railroad Company v. United States

228 F. Supp. 690 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 17, 1964

Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon Borough, 253 U.S. 287 , 40 S.Ct. 527 , 64 L.Ed. 908 (1920); Crowell v. Benson, 285 U.S. 22 , 52 S.Ct. 285 , 76 L.Ed. 598 (1932); Ng Fung Ho v. White, 259 U. … Co. v.

Stone v. Stone

450 F. Supp. 919 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 1978

Local 1115 Joint Board, Nursing Home & Hospital Employees Division, 412 F.Supp. 720, 723-724 (E.D.N.Y. 1976). … Phiilipson v. Board of . Administration, supra, 89 Cal.Rptr. at 70 , 473 P.2d 765 . 13 . Differences between the division of property and the payment of support of course remain.

Escobar-Lopez v. City of Daly City

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 2021

See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 25 436 U.S. at 691. … Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387, 407 (2012); see also Melendres v. Arpaio, 11 695 F.3d 990, 1000 (9th Cir. 2012).

Stewart v. Department of Consumer Affairs of California

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 2022

Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 541 (1981) overruled on other grounds by 26 Daniels v. … See Brewster v. 3 Board of Educ. of the Lynwood Unified School Dist., 149 F.3d 971, 983 (9th Cir. 1998).

Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.

36 F. Supp. 3d 942 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2014

In Westley v. … The Court noted that the inference was even stronger than in America West because “[defendants in America West were outside directors who did no more for the company than attend board meetings and serve on a board committee

Golden Gate Audubon Society, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

717 F. Supp. 1417 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 21, 1988

For example, in United States v. … Similarly, in United States v.