Case law

Shin v. Nicholson

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 29, 2023

LeBrun v. CBS Television Studios, Inc., 68 Cal. App. 5th 199, 209 (2021); see also Rakestraw v. … v.

Ramirez Fonua v. City of Hayward

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 23, 2023

See, e.g., Konen v. Caldeira, No. 22-cv-5195, 2023 WL 26 4595143, at *1 (N.D. Cal. July 17, 2023) (citing Robidoux v. … Brown v. Alexander, No. 13-cv-1451, 2015 WL 7350183, at *2 (N.D. Cal. 3 || Nov. 20, 2015) (citing Williams v. Sup. Ct., 147 Cal. App. 4th 36, 47 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)).

Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc.

854 F. Supp. 2d 712 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 22, 2012

Sanchez v. … Ting v.

Holl v. Southern Pac. Co.

71 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 19, 1947

See Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 1947, 3 Cir., 131 F.2d 327, 329, 330 ; Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 1945, 323 U.S. 574 , 65 S.Ct. 421 , 89 L.Ed. 465 ; Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine R. R., supra; Ellis v. … Rigsby, 1916, 241 U.S. 33, 42 , 36 S.Ct. 482 , 60 L.Ed. 874 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Cadriel v. Wolfspeed, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 2024

Jauregui v. Roadrunner Transp. 10 Servs., Inc., 28 F.4th 989, 994 (9th Cir. 2022) (quoting Theis Rsch., Inc. v. Brown & Bain, 400 11 F.3d 659, 662 (9th Cir. 2005)). … Brown, 2 2021 WL 3413349, at *7 (citing Gallegos v. EC USA Holdings Inc., No. 2:16-cv-03511, 2016 WL 3 8674592 (C.D. Cal. Oct 7, 2016)).

Chrisanthis v. Department of Veterans Affairs

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 31, 2023

under procedures prescribed by the Board.” … Id.; see Rodriguez v. 19 United States, 852 F.3d 67, 83 (1st Cir. 2017); cf. [Fornaro v. James, 416 F.3d 63, 64–67 (D.C.

Fernandez v. K-M Industries Holding Co.

646 F. Supp. 2d 1150 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 2009

North Star also cites Pudela v. … In Donovan v.

Folsom-Third Street Meat Co. v. Freeman

307 F. Supp. 222 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 12, 1969

In Safeway Stores, Inc. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin, 301 U.S. 1, 31, 34, 37 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 (1937); United States v. Darby, supra, 312 U.S. at 117-118 , 61 S.Ct. 451 ; United States v.

YES TO, LTD. v. Hur

779 F. Supp. 2d 1054 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2011

Ltd. v. Malaysia Intern. … In that case, the alleged forum selection clause provided that contractors would have the right to appeal to the Board of Grievances in Saudi Arabia. Id. at 219.

Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 2020

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board” or “PTAB”) of the U.S. 5 Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”)—which decides whether to institute an IPR—has held that 6 counterclaims-in-reply are not subject to the bar … Co. v. Dizol, 133 F.3d 1220, 18 1223 (9th Cir. 1988) (citing Pub. Affairs Assocs., Inc. v.

In re Tableware Antitrust Litigation

241 F.R.D. 644 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 2007

Hanon v. Dataproducts Corp., 976 F.2d 497, 509 (9th Cir.1992). The court further notes that class actions play a particularly vital role in the private enforcement of antitrust actions. See Brown v. … Simer v. Rios, 661 F.2d 655, 669 (7th Cir.1981); O’Connor v.

In re Google RTB Consumer Privacy Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 2023

Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of 25 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006) (cleaned up). … The plaintiffs argue that much of the information Google seeks to seal here 22 was revealed in Brown v. Google (No. 20-cv-3664), a related case. See Dkt. No. 574-1 ¶ 2.

Doe v. County of Sonoma

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 2024

The TAC is dismissed. 21 The Court has reviewed the TAC with the liberality afforded pro se litigants such as Doe. 22 See Brown v. Am. Gen. Life Ins. … See Lopez v.

Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Watt

569 F. Supp. 943 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 1, 1983

See, e.g., Rubin v. United States, 449 U.S. 424 , 101 S.Ct. 698, 701 , 66 L.Ed.2d 633 (1981) (citations omitted); United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564, 569 (9th Cir.1979). … Northcross v.

Ojeda v. Sandoval

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 2023

See Brown v. Oregon Dep't of Corr., 751 9 F.3d 983, 988 (9th Cir. 2014) (finding that a 27-month confinement could support a due process 10 claim); see also King v. … Rand 19 v.

Shakanasa v. Contreras

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 12, 2021

Malik v. 13 Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 333 (9th Cir. 1994) (cited with approval in Shakur, 514 F.3d at 884). 14 “Within the prison context, a viable claim of First Amendment retaliation entails five basic 15 elements … See Canell v. Lightner, 143 F.3d 1214, 1215 (9th Cir.1998) (correctional 1 substantial burden on free exercise of religion); Brown v. Washington, 752 F.

The Magnolia

253 F. 400 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 10, 1918

Crone: It is reported that there are men on board of the Magnolia. “Capt. … Guffey Petroleum Co. v. Borison, 211 Fed. 602 , 128 C. C. A. 194 , and other cases there cited.

Knapp v. Cardinale

963 F. Supp. 2d 928 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 2013

See Weiner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc., 925 F.2d 81, 83 (4th Cir.1991); Browning Corp. Int’l v. Lee, 624 F.Supp. 555, 557 (N.D.Tex.1986). … In Mitchum v.

Filippini v. United States

200 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 1961

In Lynchburg National Bank v. … Alabama By-Products Corporation v.

Jain v. Unilodgers, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 2024

Plaintiff and 9 Verma were appointed as members of Unilodgers’ Board of Directors (“Board”). … Board); ECF Nos. 74-16 and 74-17, RFA Nos. 19 19–21 (Defendants’ admissions that they invited Plaintiff to attend Board meetings in August 20 2020 and March 2021, and that Plaintiff attended a Board meeting in March