Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.15s

  • Wheeldon v. United States

    184 F. Supp. 81 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 4, 1960

    Nichols, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1893, 53 F. 665 ; The Plymouth, 2 Cir., 1915, 225 F. 483 ; National Forwarding Co. v. Payne, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1923, 297 F. 663 . 2 . Taylor v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co., 1867, 37 N.Y. 275 ; Winpenny v. … City of Philadelphia, 1871, 65 Pa. 135 ; Ball v. Ber-wind, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1886, 29 F. 541 ; Thames Towboat Co. v. Fields, D.C.S.D. N.Y.1922, 287 F. 155 ; Gulf Coast Transportation Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Apple Computer Securities Litigation

    696 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 31, 1987

    S.E.C. v. Rogers, 790 F.2d 1450, 1459 (9th Cir.1986), citing Strong v. France, 474 F.2d 747, 752 (9th Cir.1973). … The Statements were not part of quarterly reports or any other official Board of Director publications.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nguyen v. SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of California

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 6, 2025

    See Brown v. Janus of Santa Cruz, No. 21-CV-00094- 15 BLF, 2021 WL 3413349, at *5 (N.D. Cal. … Dec. 13, 2016) (finding an allegation that defendant “engaged in a uniform policy” 22 of wage abuse did not imply a 100% violation rate); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barrios v. Andrew Saul

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 22, 2021

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th 18 Cir. 2015). … See 25 Molina v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Co.

    327 F. Supp. 206 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 19, 1971

    The inventor was referring to the Brown and Zinamon patents (on which the examiner had been relying). … Co. v. Municipal Signal Co. (C.C.A. 1 Cir.) 61 F. 208 ; National Folding Box & Paper Co. v. Robertson (C.C.A. 2 Cir.) 104 F. 552 ; Lockwood v. Wickes (C.C.A. 10 Cir.) 75 F. 118 ; Chapin v. Friedberger-Aaron Mfg. Co.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Robert John Stockton v. Smith, et al.

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 9, 2026

    Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 642 (2016) (alteration in original); see 21 also Brown v. … Andres v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Edd King v. National General Insurance Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 2024

    Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). The 21 Ninth Circuit established standards governing requests to seal in Kamakana v. … Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178-79 (quoting Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F.3d 1430, 1434 3 (9th Cir. 1995)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jope v. Bear Stearns & Co.

    632 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 15, 1985

    In Scherk v. … Defendants’ Memorandum, p. 6; see also, Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 526 F.Supp. 343, 383-84 (N.D.Ohio 1981).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bean

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2026

    v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492. 12 II.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Malae v. City of Santa Clara

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 9, 2021

    Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 9 436 U.S. at 691. … .”); State Personnel Board v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Southern Pac. Co. v. Railroad Commission of California

    193 F. 699 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 1912

    Co. v. Love (C. C.) 177 Fed. 493 ; Southern Pacific Co. v. Campbell (C. C.) 189 Fed. 182 ; Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. McLendon (C. C.) 157 Fed. 961 . … Co. v. Campbell (C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tolentino v. Gillig, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 13, 2021

    See Livadas v. … See Brown v. 5 Lucky Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1189 (9th Cir. 2001) (holding claims preempted by § 6 301 “should have been dismissed with prejudice,” where plaintiff “failed to seek redress 7 as provided in the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brantley Ex Rel. McLorin v. Maxwell-Jolly

    656 F. Supp. 2d 1161 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 10, 2009

    ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Docket 14, 25 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. … Martin v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical Progress

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 19, 2021

    No. 1146. 26 4 Brown v. Wireless Networks Inc., C-07-04301 EDI, 2007 WL 2688723, at *1 (N.D. … Sept. 12, 2007) and Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., C-00-20905 RMW, 2010 WL 3719086, 27 at *1 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Guitterez

    983 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1998

    The defendant, accompanied by a child and a Latina woman (later identified as Delia Ruvalcaba), entered a brown Mercury Cougar. (Id.) … The brown Mercury Cougar driven by the defendant was registered to Miguel Angel Martinez, 1404 Emeric Avenue, San Pablo, California. (Id. at 17.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Amisil Holdings Ltd. v. Clarium Capital Management

    622 F. Supp. 2d 825 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 20, 2007

    See Morrison v. … Moreover, the court cited several cases, including Brown v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Co.

    961 F. Supp. 2d 1100 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2013

    Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Sews., Inc., 277 F.3d 1166 , 1172 (9th Cir.2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). … See Brown, 277 F.3d at 1172. Based on the information available at this stage, however, the issues in this case are neither novel nor especially complex.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Concierge Auctions, LLC v. Marterie

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 2019

    Code 8 1717; DisputeSuite.com, LLC v. Scoreinc.com, 2 Cal. 5th 968, 977 (2017); Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc., 206 Cal. App. 4th 515, 544-46 (2012); Hsu v. … Abbara, 9 Cal. 4th 863, 876 (1995); Santisas v. Goodin, 17 Cal. 4th 599, 616 (1998).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gonzalez

    District Court, N.D. California · May 21, 2026

    On January 9, 2024, Gonzalez appeared at a hearing before the Post-Board Unit Classification Committee at CTF-Soledad, after he had appeared before the Board of Parole Hearings. (Compl., Dkt. No. 2 at 3.) … Ohno v. Yasuma, 723 F.3d 984, 1011 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Guru Nanak Sikh Soc’y of Yuba City v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doyle v. Fox

    124 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 1954

    The Advisory Board in Alameda County informed the Rent Director that there were no comparable housing accommodations in the area to serve as a yardstick for fixing maximum rent. … Rhodes v. Hanschl, D.C., 94 F. Supp. 1009 , at page 1010. Judgment may be entered for defendants upon presentation of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.