Case law

Medicar Ambulance Co. v. Kramer (In Re Medicar Ambulance Co.)

174 B.R. 804 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 25, 1994

Day Resources and Development Company, Inc. v. FIB of Idaho, 21 B.R. 176, 178 (B.Ct.Idaho, 1982). … An ongoing investigation into Plaintiffs medicare billing practices falls within the rule announced in Board of Governors v. McCorp Fin., 502 U.S. 32 , 112 S.Ct. 459 , 116 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991). TV.

Gallegos

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2026

2 In support of the February 11 Motion, plaintiff cites and attaches court filings from the Review Board proceedings in Gallegos v. … See Lee v.

Ferguson v. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 2020

Co. v. … See Bey v.

Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership v. United States

397 F. Supp. 2d 1194 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 2005

Miller v. … Daigle v.

Ma

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 30, 2024

See United States v. … See SAC ¶ 81 (alleging that the Board member to 24 whom she addressed her email, “[a]lthough . . . not a SEFI employee, . . . is the Executive Officer 25 for the Water Board San Francisco Bay Region and longtime Board

Fitbit, Inc v. Koninklijke Philips N.V.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2020

Inc. v. … Any company in California that is affiliated with Royal Philips has its own 21 separate board members and executives who are not board members or executives of 22 Royal Philips.”

Cooley v. Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2025

resulted in his inability to board his 1 I. … (quoting Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 699, 706 (9th Cir. 16 1998)). See also Coto Settlement v.

Sangervasi v. City Of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California · May 22, 2023

See Scott v. 11 Pasadena Unified Sch. … (citing Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. 14 Southworth, 529 U.S. 217, 235 (2000)).

Cerrito v. Time, Inc.

302 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 13, 1969

Curtis Publishing v. Butts, supra. … New York Times v. Sullivan, infra Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, infra Garrison v. Louisiana (1964) 379 U.S. 64 , 85 S.Ct. 209 , 13 L.Ed.2d 125 Rosenblatt v.

Gonzalez

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 2025

First, state parole board officials have absolute quasi-judicial immunity when they act to grant, deny or revoke parole, because such actions are functionally comparable to those of judges. Sellars v. … Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-04 (9th Cir. 1981) (“parole board officials are entitled to absolute immunity from suits by prisoners for actions taken when processing parole applications”); Anderson v.

Levin Metals, Corp. v. Parr-Richmond Terminal Co.

781 F. Supp. 1454 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 1991

See New York City v. Exxon Corp., supra; United States v. Allied Chemical, supra; U.S. v. Mirabile, supra. … In 1950, he was elected President of PRIC, which would own the Property until 1956, but his uncle, Fred Parr, remained Chairman of the Board and Chief Operating Officer and continued to run PRIC as he had since before PRIC's

Marriage of Nasca v. PeopleSoft

87 F. Supp. 2d 967 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 23, 1999

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 27 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). Plaintiffs join defendant in this action under state law in accordance with Cal. … Co. v.

Uhuru v. Burton

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 2023

Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 12 667 (9th Cir. 2018) (citing Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 945 (2007), and Magwood v. 13 Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 333 (2010)); see also Woods v. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

United States v. Rowe

694 F. Supp. 1420 · District Court, N.D. California · May 6, 1988

In United States v. … See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 737 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1540 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (plurality opinion); United States v. Washington, 797 F.2d 1461, 1469 (9th Cir.1986). Therefore, seizure of these items was proper.

Nightingale v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 2019

Id. ¶ 39; see Brown 5 v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1170 (N.D. Cal. 2015). … See Brown v. 25 U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1170, 1173 (N.D.

Pfeister v. RSUI Indemnity Company

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 29, 2020

Harris v. … Co. v.

Aldrich v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 3, 2020

12 Brown, 564 U.S. 915 (2011) opinion), the simple formulation “continuous and systematic” was 13 much less stringent. … LLC v.

Gentry v. Hibernia Bank

152 F. Supp. 469 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 1957

Maguire v. Hibernia S. & L. Soc., 1944, 23 Cal.2d 719 , 146 P.2d 673 , 151 A.L.R. 1062 ; Bennett v. Hibernia Bank, 1956, 47 Cal.2d 540 , 305 P.2d 20 . … Gentry v. Hibernia Bank, D.C.1956, 154 F.Supp. 62 .

Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 30, 2024

Burch v. … Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983).

Jones v. Montgomery

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 2023

Petitioner challenges the denial by 5 13 || the Board of Parole Hearings of his request to advance his next parole hearing. … See 3 17 Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(2); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitioner was S 18 || convicted in Alameda County which is in this district.