Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.65s
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2020
Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004, 1010 (9th Cir. 2005). 22 “‘These contract-based challenges are governed by applicable state law,’ which in this case is 23 California.” McLellan v. … Brown, 3 430 F.3d at 1010 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Whether a party is in material 4 breach of a contractual obligation is ordinarily a question of fact. Brown v. Grimes, 192 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · May 19, 2026
See Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1421-22 (9th Cir. 5 1994), abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v. … .”); Brown v. Wachovia Bank, 244 F.R.D. 16, 19 17 (D.D.C. 2007) (“A district court has no duty to assist a plaintiff in locating a defendant’s address 18 for the purpose of service of process.”) (citing Barmes v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMulti-Flex Circuits Pty Limited v. Emerson
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2025
. ¶ 4. 5 LMI has ordered printed circuit boards from Multi-Flex for over a decade. Id. ¶ 9. … During 6 that time, LMI frequently requested that Elecsys source many of the parts for the circuit boards. 7 Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 2023
Plaintiffs contend that the 23 defect is caused by the placement of a “controller board” within the iPad. … See Brown v. Natures Path Foods, Inc., No. 21-CV- 25 05132-HSG, 2022 WL 717816, at *6, n.15 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2022).
Cited 0 timesUnknown60 F. Supp. 3d 1051 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 25, 2014
The FEHA establishes a comprehensive scheme for combating and eliminating employment discrimination. *1057 Brown v. Super. Ct, 37 Cal.3d 477, 485 , 208 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 691 P.2d 272 (1984). … See Hardin v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 15, 2023
See Brown, 21 2022 WL 717816, at *2. … In any event, the Court agrees with the reasoning in 26 Brown v. Van’s Int’l Foods, Inc., No. 22-CV-00001-WHO, 2022 WL 1471454, at *7 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknown64 F.R.D. 680 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 17, 1974
One case, Johnson v. … Defendants Bergna and Brown, undoubtedly recognizing the excellent academic and professional backgrounds of plaintiffs’ attorneys, concede that use of the billing rate of $50 an hour in calculating reasonable attorneys’ fees
Reversed on other grounds by Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 436 U.S. 547 (1978)Cited 137 timesPublishedBrenda L Campbell v. Carnival Corporation
District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 2021
See Scherk v. … He accepted the terms of the Passage 10 Contract on January 3, 2020, over a month before boarding the Grand Princess. See Dkt. No. 22- 11 1 at ¶ 18; accord Oltman v. Holland Am.
Cited 0 timesUnknown7 F.2d 169 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 1925
Cas. 897; Merchants’ Stock & Grain Co. v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, 187 F. 398, 399 , 109 C. C. A. 230 ; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, 328 , 24 S. Ct. 665 , 48 L. … A. 361 ; Davidson v. Wilson (C. C. A.) 286 F. 108, 110 ; Haimsohn v. United States (C. C. A.) 2 F. (2d) 441, 442.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 2024
Brown-Hunter v. 8 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 2020
Brown v. Dep’t of Navy, No. 90-55789, 19 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7378, at *9 (9th Cir. … , or has been 25 deemed to have been rejected by the board”).
Cited 0 timesUnknown141 F. 481 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 1905
companies refused to accept the abandonment The Del Norte was rescued from her perilous situation on the Siuslaw bar, underwent temporary repairs, and then the libelant, still retaining his position as her master, took on board … Earle v. Coburn, 130 Mass. 596 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedPenning v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1021
District Court, N.D. California · Jan 16, 2020
Babb v. Cal. Teachers Ass’n, 378 F. Supp. 3d 857, 871 16 (C.D. Cal. 2019) (citing cases), appeal pending, No. 19-55692 (9th Cir.); Danielson v. AFSCME 17 Council 28, 340 F. Supp. 3d 1083, 1084 (W.D. … Marbury v. 2 Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).
Cited 0 timesUnknown309 F.R.D. 518 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2015
In Morillion v. … In Overton v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSonya Martin v. Berkeley Unified School District
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 2023
See Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. … See 7 Celotex Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown506 B.R. 89 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 9, 2013
The IRS relies on Nadarajah v. Holder, 569 F.3d 906 (9th Cir.2009), Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Winter, 543 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir.2008), and Love v. … In light of Ingram v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRosas ex rel. Perez v. McMahon
700 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1988
In Becker v. … In Turner v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJack v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
820 F. Supp. 1218 · District Court, N.D. California · May 17, 1993
Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. … . -, 112 S.Ct. 616 , 116 L.Ed.2d 638 (1991); Floyd v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMatter of Requested Extradition of Smyth
863 F. Supp. 1137 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 15, 1994
McMullen v. United States, 953 F.2d 761, 765 (2d Cir.1992). … Finucane v.
Reversed by a later decision, 61 F.3d 711 (1995)Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 2020
United States v. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna