Case law

Codexis, Inc. v. Codex DNA, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 2021

See e.g., Nuance Communs., Inc. v. ABBYY 5 || Software House, No. C 08-02912 JSW (MEJ), 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95331, at *7-8 (N.D. Cal. 6 July 10, 2012); United States ex rel. Brown v. Celgene Corp., No. … Oct. 23, 2012) 10 (magistrate judge does not have authority to amend district judge’s scheduling order or to hear 11 untimely discovery disputes); UMG Recordings, Inc. v.

Saddozai v. Bolanos

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2020

Nor can a city or county be held vicariously 15 liable for the unconstitutional acts of its employees under the theory of respondeat 16 superior, see Board of Cty. Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); 17 Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v.

Blockchain Innovation, LLC v. Franklin Resources, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 2024

Anderson v. … V.

MySpace, Inc. v. GraphOn Corp.

756 F. Supp. 2d 1218 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 23, 2010

The Mother of all Bulletin Boards The Mother of all Bulletin Boards (MBB) was developed over several months in Fall 1993 through February 1994 by Dr. … Altiris v.

Gonzalez v. Chappell

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2024

First, state parole board officials have absolute quasi-judicial immunity when they act to grant, deny or revoke parole, because such actions are functionally comparable to those of judges. Sellars v. … Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-04 (9th Cir. 1981) (“parole board officials are entitled to absolute immunity from suits by prisoners for actions taken when processing parole applications”); Anderson v.

In Re Capital West Investors

186 B.R. 497 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 20, 1995

Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Underground Construction Co., Inc., 31 F.3d 776, 778 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 , 104 S.Ct. 1188 , 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984).

Miller v. Minerals Separation Ltd.

275 F. 380 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 1921

Clair v. Cox, 106 U. S. 350 , 1 Sup. Ct. 354, 27 L. Ed. 222 ; Cady v. Associated Colonies [C. C.] 119 Fed. 420 ; Henning v. Planters’ Ins. Co. [C. C.] 28 Fed. 440 ; Hazeltine v. Mississippi Val. Fire Ins. Co. [C. … Wall v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co., 95 Fed. 398 , 37 C. C. A. 129 ; Benton v. McIntosh (C. C.) 96 Fed. 132 ; Forrest v. Pittsburgh Bridge Co., 116 Fed. 357 , 53 C. C. A. 577 ; Union Water Dev. Co. v. Stevenson (D.

Alsup v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

57 F.R.D. 89 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 1972

In Alsup et al. v. … In Zachary v.

Bldg. Indus. Ass'n-Bay Area v. City of Oakland

289 F. Supp. 3d 1056 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 2018

McClung v. City of Sumner , 548 F.3d 1219 , 1227 (9th Cir. 2008) ; Ehrlich v. … State Board of Educ. v. Barnette , 319 U.S. 624 , 642, 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943).

Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust of Northern California v. Bay Area HVAC, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · May 30, 2020

Longshoremen v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 391 (1986); Ethridge v. Harbor House Restaurant, 861 F.2d 1389, 1401 (9th Cir. 1988). … The Board has carved out an exception to this general rule for collective bargaining during the term of a Section 8(f) pre-hire contract, but the Board hasn’t extended Section 8(b)(3) to negotiations for the initial pre-hire

United States v. Pacific Gas & Electric

776 F. Supp. 2d 1007 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 2011

See Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. … United States v.

International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 6 v. Cutter Laboratories

552 F. Supp. 979 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1982

In pertinent part, the agreement provides that: The decision of the Arbitrator or the Arbitration Board shall be final and binding upon the parties and any expenses of the arbitration shall be shared equally by the parties … See, e.g., International Association of Machinists v. Texas Steel, 538 F.2d 1116 , (5th Cir.1976). See also, District 50, U.M.W. v. Bowman Transportation, 421 F.2d 934 (5th Cir.1970); Painters, Local 756 v.

Petition of Carmen

165 F. Supp. 942 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 12, 1958

Board of Commissioners of Creek County v. Seber, 1943, 318 U.S. 705, 718 , 63 S.Ct. 920 , 87 L.Ed. 1094 ; Tiger v. Western Investment Co., 1911, 221 U.S. 286 , 31 S.Ct. 578 , 55 L.Ed. 738 ; United States v. … Board of Commissioners of Creek County v. Seber, 1943, 318 U.S. 705, 718 , 63 S.Ct. 920 , 87 L.Ed. 1094 ; United States v. Nice, 1915, 241 U.S. 591, 598 , 36 S.Ct. 696 , 60 L.Ed. 1192 ; Tiger v.

Toyo Kisen Kaisha v. W. R. Grace & Co.

48 F.2d 850 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 1931

“AH on board to be delivered. “Kindly confirm on copy of this letter attached herewith. “Yours very truly, “W. R. Grace & Co. “Traffic Department. “K. Doi “Confirmed: “FPH :KR” Thereupon respondent’s. … See Northern Pacific Rv: Co. v. American Trading Co., 195 U. S. 439 , 25 S. Ct. 84 , 49 L. Ed. 269 ; The Arctic Bird (D. C.) 109 F. 167 . The libel will be dismissed.

Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Codding

501 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 23, 1980

For example, Bledsoe v. … As the Supreme Court opined in Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

B.L.S.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 2026

Chavez v. … DiCampli-Mintz v.

Ramirez v. Oakland Unified School District

District Court, N.D. California · May 27, 2025

White 5 v. … of school trustees or a board of 2 education.”

Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

799 F. Supp. 1006 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1992

It should be emphasized that Shaw confines its holding to suits involving literary works, or arguably the literary aspects of works, see Brown Bag v. … Telemarketing Resources v. Symantec Corp., 12 USPQ2d 1991, 1989 WL 200350 (N.D.Cal.1989), aff’d in part as Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465 (9th Cir.1992).

Computer Place, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

607 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1984

CPI contends that the relevant market is the technical/professional sub-market. 11 *833 The standards for defining product markets and submarkets were set forth in Brown Shoe Co. v. … CPI relies on this evidence to establish a technical/professional submarket but it has failed to produce evidence of the practical indicia required by Brown.

McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

565 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 1983

In SEC v. … In Madden , the Board of Administration of the State Employees Retirement System (“the Board”) negotiated a medical services contract with Kaiser Foundation Health Plan on behalf of state employees.