Case law

Whitlock v. PEPSI AMERICAS

681 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 2010

See Avila, et al. v. Willits Environmental Remediation Trust, et al., C 99-3941 SI; Abbott et al. v. Willits Environmental Remediation Trust, et al., C 01-266 SI; Nickerman, et al., v. … In Nickerman, the plaintiffs relied on Potter v.

United States v. Williams

76 F. 223 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 22, 1896

Evans v. U. S., 153 U. S. 584 , 14 Sup. Ct. 934, 939. … Law Dict. 293; Burrall v. Acker, 23 Wend. 608 .

Crocker First National Bank v. United States

137 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 1955

. § 3746 ; United States v. Steel Furniture Co., 6 Cir., 1935, 74 F.2d 744 . … of Tax Appeals for redetermination of a deficiency, or for review of a decision rendered by the Board.

The Loch Trool

150 F. 429 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 22, 1907

Sawyer v. Oakman, 7 Blatchf. 290 , Fed. Cas. No. 12,402; Petty v. Merrill, 9 Blatchf. 447 , Fed. Cas. No. 11,-050; The Monitor and The Hill, 3 Biss. 24 , Fed. Cas. No. 9,711; The Baltimore, 8 Wall. 377 , 19 L. Ed. 463 . … In Sawyer v. Oakman, 7 Blatchf. 290 , Fed. Cas.

La Raza Unida of Southern Alameda County v. Volpe

440 F. Supp. 904 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 1977

Board of Trustees, 538 F.2d 53 (3d Cir. 1976); Jordan v. Fusari, 496 F.2d 646 (2d Cir. 1974); cf. Jordon v. Gilligan, 500 F.2d 701 (6th Cir. 1974). The issue was decided by this circuit in Brandenburger v. … See Examining Board of Engineers v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 , 96 S.Ct. 2264 , 49 L.Ed.2d 65 (1975); Lynch v. Household Fin. Corp., 405 U.S. 538 , 92 S.Ct. 1113 , 31 L.Ed.2d 424 (1972); Monroe v.

Labolle v. Nitto Line

268 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 1967

Co. v. … First, it is uncontroverted that the longshoreman was allowed to board the vessel in a state of severe intoxication.

West Pub. Co. v. McColgan

46 F. Supp. 163 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 1942

Interborough Rapid Transit Co., D.C., 10 F.Supp. 512 , affirmed, 2 Cir., 76 F.2d 1002 , certiorari denied City *165 of New York v. … Nevin v. Martin, D.C., 22 F.Supp. 836 , affirmed 307 U.S. 615 , 59 S.Ct. 1046 , 83 L.Ed. 1497 .

Orozco v. County of Monterey

941 F. Supp. 930 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 20, 1996

Rather, they are created and their dimensions are defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law____” Board of Regents v. … This claim finds no support in National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 , 95 S.Ct. 959 , 43 L.Ed.2d 171 (1975), cited by plaintiff. The J.

Reynolds v. Binance Holdings Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2020

Daimler, 571 U.S. at 137 (quoting Goodyear Dunlop 11 Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011)). … Therefore, that Binance and BAM share board members and a CFO does not 2 on its own sufficiently establish a unity of interest. See Apple Inc. v. Allan & Assocs.

Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

212 F. Supp. 3d 829 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 2016

The case that is the closest to the situation here, Bio-Rad contends, is Willy v. Administrative Review Board, 423 F.3d 483, 489 (5th Cir. 2005). … of directors of *855 the issuer or to another committee of the board of directors comprised solely of directors not employed directly or indirectly by the issuer, or to the board of directors. 15 U.S.C. § 7245 .

California Council of the Blind v. County of Alameda

985 F. Supp. 2d 1229 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 2013

Inc. v. … In Baughman v.

Samra

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 31, 2025

Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp., 546 U.S. 132, 139 (2005). … Defendant relies on Harris v. 2 Bankers Life & Cas.

In re Bennett

84 F. 324 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 1897

People v. Gilmore, 4 Cal. 376 ; People v. Gordon, 99 Cal. 227 , 33 Pac. 901 ; Com. v. Herty, 109 Mass. 348 ; State v. Belden, 33 Wis. 121 ; State v. Martin, 30 Wis. 216 ; State v. Hill, Id. 416; State v. … In speaking of what is meant by the phrase “due process of law,” the supreme court of Mississippi, in Brown v.

Firsov

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 2026

FIRSOV, Case No. 25-cv-03689-AGT Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. … He brings claims against each airline based on events that took place on different dates during the boarding process for different flights.

Lewis v. Puente

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 25, 2025

Brown (Brown), No. 2:09-cv-00195-FCD-DAD (E.D. Cal. … See Knapp v.

Board of Trustees of the Sign, Pictorial and Display Industry Welfare Fund, et al. v. PS Trade Show Services, Inc., A Nevada Corporation, et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2023

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SIGN, Case No. 22-cv-09137-HSG (AGT) PICTORIAL AND DISPLAY … Council No. 36 v.

The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, et al. v. Acumen Construction Management, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 2026

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 THE BOARD … (Mot. for Default J. at 18-19.) 23 While Plaintiffs cite Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust v.

Price v. The Elmbank

62 F. 306 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 11, 1894

Ibice remained on board the vessel all of Saturday night, and was up superintending and watching the fire until about 5 o’clock Sunday morning, when be took a rest of about an hour and a half, on board the tug Fearless, which … In Spreckles v. The Brussels, 38 Fed. 524 , the salvage service was by a steam tug to a vessel on fire, which prevented the fire from spreading until a fire boat came.up and extinguished the fire.

Swords to Plowshares v. Kemp

423 F. Supp. 2d 1031 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 16, 2005

City of Chi. v. Int’l College of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 164 , 118 S.Ct. 523 , 139 L.Ed.2d 525 (1997) (citing Franchise Tax Board v. Constr. … Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 9 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 .

In re Petersen

95 F. 417 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 6, 1899

square bench, 1 square table, 2 triangles for mixing dough, 4 bowie knives, 1 table knife, 2 sieves, 1 lot ornamenting tools, 2 bread scales with weights, 3 scrapers, 2 trainers, 2 yeast barrels, 2 big stone jugs, 40 bread boards … Under a statute of Massachusetts, the tools of a debtor “necessary for his trade or occupation” were exempted from execution; and, in construing this statute, the supreme court of that state in Howard v.