Case law

The Tiger

90 F. 826 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 1898

This is a suit in admiralty to enforce a. lien against (he steam tug Tiger for the balance due the libelant for work performed by him on board that boat as carpenter and seaman between the 17th of March, 1896, and the 38th … No. 16,806; The Bristol, 11 Fed. 156 , 20 Fed. 800 ; Nesbit v. The Amboy, 36 Fed. 926 .

Casey v. Ohio Medical Products

877 F. Supp. 1380 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 1995

This motion invokes the powers delegated to the district courts by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). … It is a study entitled “Drug Induced Liver Disease in Denmark: An Analysis of 572 Cases of Hepatotoxicity Reported to The Danish Board of Adverse Reactions to Drugs,” dated 1981. It should be noted that Dr.

Montague v. The Isaac Reed

82 F. 566 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 1897

This is an action to recover damages on account of sundry range boilers and small articles of hardware shipped by the libelant at the port of New York on board the ship Isaac Reed, for carriage to San Francisco, and which … Under such a contract of carriage, when the goods are damaged, the burden to prove and show proper stowage is on the carrier (Edwards v. The Cahala, 14 La.

Redd-Oyedele v. Santa Clara County Office of Education

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2025

See Maney v. Brown, 91 F.4th 1296, 1302 (9th Cir. 2024). 27 2 Counts four and five appeared as counts three and four respectively in the FAC. … Avalos v.

United States v. $49,790 in United States Currency

763 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 2010

See, for example, United States v. … Claimant testified at his deposition that the $50,000 cash was precounted in bundles with bank-wrappers and was placed in a brown paper bag. Doc. # 38 at 66-69.

In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Honolulu, Hawaii

783 F. Supp. 1261 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 1992

Id. at 409 , citing Choy v. Pan American Airways Co., 1941 Am. Mar.Cas. 483 (S.D.N.Y.1941). See also Komlos v. Compagnie Nationale Air France, 209 F.2d 436 (2d Cir.1953); Noel v. … Miles v.

Moholy v. United States

132 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, N.D. California · May 31, 1955

Section 153 provides as follows: “The civil service, commission by rule and subject to the approval of the board of supervisors by ordinance, shall provide for leaves of absence, due to illness or disability, which leave … The plaintiff counters by saying these payments are not wages, citing Adams v.

Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 2023

Primiano v. Cook, 598 F.3d 24 558, 564 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1318 25 (9th Cir. 1995)). … Kumho Tire 9 Co. v.

Bioscience Advisors, Inc. v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

District Court, N.D. California · May 24, 2022

eB pO utY y N AT ssO isN tan t Attorney General 2 PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS, P.C. ELIZABETH J. … 12 BIOSCIENCE ADVISORS, INC., Civil Action No. 4:21-CV-0866-HSG 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER v.

Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area

279 F.R.D. 501 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2011

Armstrong v. … See James v.

Baccarat v. Andrew F. Mahoney Co.

4 F. Supp. 611 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 7, 1933

C.) 16 F.(2d) 1003 ; Stewart v. United States Shipping Board (D. C.) 7 F.(2d) 676 ; The Charlotte (C. C. A.) 299 F. 595 ; Hills v. Leeds (D. C.) 149 P. 878 ; Golcar S. S. Co., Ltd., v. Tweedie Trading Co. (D. … C.) 146 F. 563 ; American Steel-Barge Co. v. Cargo of Coal (D. C.) 107 F. 964 ; Posey v. Scoville (C. C.) 10 F. 140 . Libelant is not entitled to recover in this cause.

In Re Accuray, Inc. Securities Litigation

757 F. Supp. 2d 936 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 2010

Defendant Tu has been a member of the Board of Directors since May, 2004. Defendant Wu is Accuray’s Chairman of the Board and has been a Director since April, 1998. … In Berson v.

In Re Benny

29 B.R. 754 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 1983

See, e.g., Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 , 100 S.Ct. 1287 , 63 L.Ed.2d 574 (1980). Compare Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), with Plessy v. … In this case, the addressee’s right to receive information, Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.

Cox v. Burton

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2021

.”); Poe v. … Brown, 2017 WL 1233333, at *1 (N.D. Cal.

Sellers v. United States Lines Co.

89 F. Supp. 254 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 8, 1949

Gylock v. Alaska Packers Ass’n, D.C., 82 F.Supp. 127 (Judge Harris); Miller v. United States, D.C., 51 F.Supp. 924 ; Colon v. United States, D.C., 74 F.Supp. 216 . … United States v. Johnson, 9 Cir., 160 F.2d 789 ; Ellis v. American Hawaiian S. S. Co., 9 Cir., 165 F.2d 999 .

Keller v. Kate Maremount Foundation

365 F. Supp. 798 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 1972

Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963)], attending a public school [Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961)], public employment [Greene v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges, 446 F.2d 806 (7th Cir. 1971)], not being evicted from a public housing project [Escalera v.

In re Toy Asbestos Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2021

Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 942 (9th 8 Cir. 2007); see also Primiano v. … Accord MacQueen v. Warren Pumps LLC, 16 246 F. Supp. 3d 1004, 1015–18 (D. Del. 2017); Yaw v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp., No. C18-5405 17 BHS, 2019 WL 3891792, at *3 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 19, 2019).

Bell v. Williams

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 16, 2020

See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. of Bryan Cty. 27 v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. … Wood v.

Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railroad Commission of California

257 F. 197 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 1919

It appears from the bill that after the rendition of the orders in question plaintiff filed with the defendant board a petition for a rehearing of the controversy, which petition was upon consideration denied; and it is alleged … Co. v. Michigan Railroad Commission, supra.

In re Grand Jury Subpoena for: [Redacted]@ yahoo.com

79 F. Supp. 3d 1091 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 2015

Brown, The Witness and Grand Jury Secrecy, 11 A m. J.Crim. Law 169, 170 (1983)). . Id. at 630, 110 S.Ct. 1376 . . Id. (quoting United States v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1, 11 , 93 S.Ct. 764 , 35 L.Ed.2d 67 (1973)). . Id. . … (citing Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia, 435 U.S. 829, 838 , 98 S.Ct. 1535 , 56 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978); Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 690-91 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972)). .