The opinion
1 R rcO larB kE @R pT a rS r. b C roL wA nR .cK om (C BN 93634) B PrR inIA ciN pa lM D. eB pO utY y N AT ssO isN tan t Attorney General
2
PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS, P.C. ELIZABETH J. SHAPIRO
101 South 200 East, Suite 700 Deputy Director, Federal Programs Branch
3 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 ALEXANDRA R. SASLAW (SBN 318610)
Telephone: (801) 532-7840 Trial Attorney
4 United States Department of Justice
CHAD S. PEHRSON (CBN 261829) Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
5 cpehrson@kba.law P.O. Box 883
KUNZLER BEAN & ADAMSON, P.C. Washington, DC 20044
6
4225 Executive Square, Suite 600 Phone: (202) 514-4520
7 La Jolla, California 92037 alexandra.r.saslaw@usdoj.gov
619-371-5511
8 Attorneys for Defendants
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 BIOSCIENCE ADVISORS, INC., Civil Action No. 4:21-CV-0866-HSG
13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER
v. REGARDING LEAVE TO FILE
14 EXCESS PAGES
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
15 EXCHANGE COMMISSION, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Plaintiff and Defendants (“parties”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby submit the
18
following Stipulation requesting that the Court enter an order providing leave for Defendants to file
19
a memorandum in excess of the page limit set forth in Local Rule 7-2(b). In support of this
20
stipulation, the parties state as follows:
21
1. Pursuant to the Court’s May 16, 2022 Order, ECF No. 56, Defendants’ motion for
22
summary judgment is currently due on May 24, 2022.
23
2. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(b), a motion and accompanying memorandum of points
24
and authorities may not exceed 25 pages without leave of court.
25
3. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint in this action advances four claims for relief
26
under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”)
27
against two separate government agencies, and many the claims raise multiple distinct issues.
1 example, Plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief challenges both the National Archives and Records
2 Administration’s approval of the challenged records schedule and the SEC’s adoption of that
3 records schedule, and Plaintiff’s Fourth Claim for Relief challenges the SEC’s response to hundreds
4 of FOIA requests submitted by Plaintiff.
5 4. Due to the number of issues raised in the Second Amended Complaint, Defendants
6 believe that they need additional pages in order to fully brief each of these issues, and that the Court
7 would benefit from that additional briefing.
8 5. The parties have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, that Defendants may file a
9 memorandum of points and authorities in support of their motion for summary judgment of up to
10 35 pages.
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY 2022:
12
KUNZLER BEAN & ADAMSON, PC BRIAN M. BOYNTON
13
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
14 /s/ Chad S. Pehrson Civil Division
Chad S. Pehrson
15 KUNZLER BEAN & ADAMSON, P.C. ELIZABETH J. SHAPIRO
4225 Executive Square, Suite 600 Deputy Director, Federal Programs Branch
16 La Jolla, California 92037
619-371-5511 /s/ Alexandra R. Saslaw
17
cpehrson@kba.law ALEXANDRA R. SASLAW
18 Trial Attorney
PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS United States Department of Justice
19 Robert S. Clark Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
101 South 200 East, Suite 700 P.O. Box 883
20 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Washington, DC 20044
Telephone: (801) 532-7840 Phone: (202) 514-4520
21 rclark@parrbrown.com alexandra.r.saslaw@usdoj.gov
22
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER AES DISTRICS
| ey SON
3 || Dated: 5/24/2022 DEN wh \
Alapwe A LINE
A judge Baywood SSE
’ LY > LSS
ISTRIC
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28