Case law

Manaka v. Monterey Sardine Industries, Inc.

48 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 2, 1942

Clarke v. Morey, supra; Otteridge v. Thompson, Fed.Cas.No.10,618, 2 Cranch C.C. 108 . See Parkinson v. Wentworth, 11 Mass. 26 ; Seymour v. Bailey, 66 Ill. 288, 301 . State ex rel. Constanti v. … See Kaufman v. Eisenberg, 177 Misc. 939 , 32 N.Y.S.2d 450 ; See Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co., Inc., 177 Misc. 763 , 31 N.Y.S.2d 815 .

Clausen v. Beneficial Finance Co. of Berkeley

423 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 20, 1976

Chicago Health Clubs, Inc., 347 F.Supp. 955 (N.D.Ill.1972); Burley v. Bastrap Loan Co., Inc., 407 F.Supp. 773 (W.D.La.1976). Other courts and the Federal Reserve Board have taken a more narrow view of the term “charge”. … Johnson v. McCracken-Sturman Ford, Inc., 527 F.2d 259 (3d Cir. 1975); Federal Reserve Board Staff Opinion Letter No. 851, 4 CCH Consumer Credit Guide ¶ 31,173 (Oct. 22, 1974). Most recently, in LaGrone v.

Pacaso Inc. v. City of St. Helena

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 2021

Brown Elec. Contractor, Inc. v. Rhino Elec. Supply, Inc., 137 Cal. … of California’s Brown Act, 6 Government Code. section 54950 et seq.

Piva v. Xerox Corp.

70 F.R.D. 378 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1975

In Rich v. … In Hill v.

United States v. Winhoven

14 F.R.D. 18 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 7, 1953

For, in my opinion, this is a striking example of the abusive type of procedure referred to by Justice Jackson in his concurring opinion in Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 532 , 73 S.Gt. 397, decided February 9, 1953. … Upon the appeal, the Court of Appeals, on February 28, 1952, Winhoven v.

McCaw Personal Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telesis Group

645 F. Supp. 1166 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 1986

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , *1173 1524, 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). Plaintiff also seeks relief under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 , 2. … Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 322 n. 38, 82 S.Ct. at 1522 n. 38. It is undisputed that the paging industry has been changing dramatically over the past five years.

Borges v. County of Mendocino

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 2021

See Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. … Torres v.

Embury v. King

191 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 2001

Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982); see also Fair Assessment in Real Estate Ass’n, Inc. v. … irregularities by the board.”

United States v. Bassett

24 F. Cas. 1029 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1855

S. v. … It was unanimously confirmed by the board, and we see no reason for reversing their decision. A decree of confirmation must therefore be entered.

Redd-Oyedele v. Santa Clara County Office of Education

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2025

See Maney v. Brown, 91 F.4th 1296, 1302 (9th Cir. 2024). 27 2 Counts four and five appeared as counts three and four respectively in the FAC. … Avalos v.

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Nadkarni

391 F. Supp. 3d 917 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 2019

Knievel v. ESPN , 393 F.3d 1068 , 1076 (9th Cir. 2005) ( citing Parrino v. … Sylve v. Riley , 15 Cal. App. 4th 23 , 26, 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 608 (1993) ; Menefee v. Ostawari, 228 Cal.

Flying Tiger Lines, Inc. v. Landy

250 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 1965

Warner v. Goltra, 293 U.S. 55, 159-160 , 55 S.Ct. 46 , 79 L.Ed. 254 (1934). … Plaintiffs now argue that the Commission award was res judicata because a final award of an industrial accident board has the same effect as the final judgment of a court.

Petersen v. Clark

285 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, N.D. California · May 13, 1968

Selective Service Local Board No. 11, 391 U.S. 912 , 88 S.Ct. 1804 , 20 L.Ed.2d 651 ), which the parties then believed would resolve the issue of the constitutionality of § 460(b) (3). … See International Ladies’ Garment Workers Union v. Donnelly Garment Co., 304 U.S. 243 , 58 S.Ct. 857 , 82 L.Ed. 1316 (1938).

Laramie v. County of Santa Clara

784 F. Supp. 1492 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 5, 1992

Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209, 237 , 97 S.Ct. 1782, 1800 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977). This action was filed on November 15, 1990. … Acting under color of state law, i.e. the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, Cal.Gov’t Code § 3500 et seq.

Conley v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

286 F. Supp. 2d 1097 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 26, 2002

Waters v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 138-39 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (“FDA ”).

Competitive Technologies v. Fujitsu Ltd.

286 F. Supp. 2d 1118 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2003

The property of the University of Illinois, though held by the board of trustees, belongs to the state. People v. Board of Trustees, 283 Ill. 494 , 119 N.E. 595 [(1918)]; Spalding v. … People, 172 Ill. 40 , 49 N.E. 993 [(1898)]; Board of Trustees v. Champaign County, 76 Ill. 184 [(1875)]; Thomas v. Industrial University, 71 Ill. 310 [(1874)].

United States v. $49,790 in United States Currency

763 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 2010

See, for example, United States v. … Claimant testified at his deposition that the $50,000 cash was precounted in bundles with bank-wrappers and was placed in a brown paper bag. Doc. # 38 at 66-69.

Bioscience Advisors, Inc. v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

District Court, N.D. California · May 24, 2022

eB pO utY y N AT ssO isN tan t Attorney General 2 PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS, P.C. ELIZABETH J. … 12 BIOSCIENCE ADVISORS, INC., Civil Action No. 4:21-CV-0866-HSG 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER v.

Wynn v. Chanos

75 F. Supp. 3d 1228 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2014

See Thomas v. … See Nicosia v.

United States v. Small

664 F. Supp. 1357 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 1987

Bumper v. … See Arizona v. Hicks, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 1149, 1153 , 94 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987); Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 736-37 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1540-41 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (citing Coolidge v.