Case law

Bess v. Wise

275 Cal. App. 2d 158 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1969

Plaintiffs alone were entitled to treat the entry as a trespass and to take action against it (Brown Derby Hollywood Cory. v. … Code, *167 § 1925; Yee Chuck v. Board of Trustees, supra, 179 Cal.App. 2d 405 at p. 410 ; Heilbron v. Kings River etc. Canal Co., supra, 76 Cal. 11 at p. 16 .)

People v. Alliance Life Insurance

65 Cal. App. 2d 808 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1944

Co. v. Hopkins, 1 Cal.2d 414 [ 35 P.2d 320 ]; Carpenter v. Peoples Mut. Life Ins. Co., 10 Cal. 2d 299 [ 74 P.2d 508 ] ; Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Jordan, 168 Cal. 270 [ 142 P. 839 ] ; Edward Brown & Sons v. … Co. v. McColgan, 48 Cal.App. 2d 800 [ 120 P.2d 682 ]; Union Oil Associates v. Johnson, 2 Cal.2d 727 [ 43 P.2d 291 ]; Edward Brown & Sons v. Mc-Colgan, supra, 507.)

Harris Feeding Co. v. Department of Industrial Relations

224 Cal. App. 3d 464 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1990

In Industrial Welfare Com. v. … Vartabedian, J., and Brown (G. A.), J., * concurred.

Fry v. Astorg

29 Cal. App. 740 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1916

Fry, as assignee of V. A. Hager, commenced this action against A. Astorg and the appellant, recovering judgment against each of them. The judgment against the appellant must be reversed. … The case of Zane v. De Onativia, 135 Cal. 440 , [67 Pac. *742 685], is very like the present one.

Wood v. Waterman

102 Cal. App. 516 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1929

Bank v. … The case of Freeman v.

In re Marti

California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 2021

Rhode, Brown’s reviewing supervisor, signed the rules violation report prepared by Brown. … (See Gomez v.

Munson v. City of Eureka CA1/2

California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2025

State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind (1967) 67 Cal.2d 536, 541.) … The parties agree that the de novo standard of review applies to a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer is sustained without leave to amend.2 (Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081; Brown v.

A & M RECORDS, INC. v. State Bd. of Equalization

204 Cal. App. 3d 358 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 1, 1988

(Parrott & Co. v. City & County of S. F, supra, 131 Cal.App.2d at p. 342 .) The board of equalization has special competence to evaluate property. (Stenocord Corp. v. … Thus, the taxpayer must resort to the Board first for determination of all issues. (Barnes v.

Wright v. Standard Engineering Corp.

28 Cal. App. 3d 244 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 1972

(Durkin v. Durkin, 133 Cal.App.2d 283, 286 [ 284 P.2d 185 ].) … specifying the amount, interest, and penalty due, the name and address as it appears on the records of the board of the person liable for the same, and the fact that the board has complied with all provisions of this part

Partridge v. Von Ahnden

85 Cal. App. 2d 557 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1948

Brown and Geraldine S. Litwin, to share and share alike. *558 “Ninth. … Brown and Geraldine S. Litwin, to share and share alike.” (Italics added.)

People v. Roberts

184 Cal. App. 4th 1149 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2010

(U.S. v. … (People v.

Daly v. Otis

92 Cal. App. 242 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1928

to be known as the police and fire board. … (Johnston v. Callahan, 146 Cal. 212, 214 [ 79 Pac. 870 ]; Morris v. Iden, 23 Cal. App. 388, 392 [ 138 Pac. 120 ].)

People v. Manning

165 Cal. App. 4th 870 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 2008

(See People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 534 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 73 P.3d 1137 ].) C. … (People v. Brown (1994) 8 Cal.4th 746, 749-750 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 407 , 883 P.2d 949 ].)

People v. Williams

California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 2016

(Di Genova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 174.) … (People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 319 (Brown), quoting Evangelatos v. Superior Court (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1188, 1208-1209.)

People v. Antonelli

California Court of Appeal · Jul 18, 2023

Gregory jumped into the fray, grabbed the rifle, and clubbed Brown with it until Brown released Blair’s thumb. Brown and Schommer fought one another until Brown held a buck knife to Schommer’s neck. … We stated: “In People v.

Toubus v. Superior Court

114 Cal. App. 3d 378 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1981

McCampbell, Liz and Brown returned to the apartment where Brown was introduced as Liz’ cousin. Brown then tested the cocaine and told Liz to go out and get a scale to weigh the powder. … Petitioner admitted McCampbell and Brown to sell them cocaine. McCampbell and Brown entered to purchase cocaine from him. There was no ruse.

Lodge v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

105 Cal. App. 160 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1930

Lodge wrote Brown as follows: “Auberry, California, November 19, 1927. “Mr. A. B. Brown, Fresno, California. “My dear Mr. Brown: Complying with your request, find enclosed list of our expenses and losses. … Code; Lockhart v. J. H. McDougall Co., 190 Cal. 308 [ 212 Pac. 1 ]; McClintick v. Leonards, 103 Cal. App. 768 [ 285 Pac. 351 ].) Appellant did not do this.

Helix Land Co. v. City of San Diego

82 Cal. App. 3d 932 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1978

(Id, at pp. 512-518; see also Brown v. City of Fremont, 75 Cal.App.3d 141 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 46 ].) In Eldridge v. … (People v. Lim, 18 Cal.2d 872, 881 [ 118 P.2d 472 ]; People v. Seccombe, 103 Cal.App. 306, 310 [ 284 P. 725 ]; Brown v. Rea, 150 Cal. 171, 174, 175 [ 88 P. 713 ].)

People v. Williams

195 Cal. App. 3d 398 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1987

(Brown v. Ohio, supra, 432 U.S. at p. 166 [ 53 L.Ed.2d at p. 194 ].) … Stressing the interest of the state and distinguishing Brown v.

In Re Estate of Manuel

187 Cal. App. 4th 400 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 2010

TERRI WILSON, Petitioner and Respondent, v. NANCY L. BROWN, Contestant and Appellant; DAWN CLARK-JOHNSON et al., Objectors and Appellants. Nos. B210701, B215380. … Keystone Health Plan Central, Inc. (3d Cir. 2009) 580 F.3d 119, 141 ; Insurance Benefit Administrators, Inc. v. Martin (7th Cir. 1989) 871 F.2d 1354, 1360 ; Apex Oil Co. v.