Case law

Oakland Raiders v. NATIONAL FOORBALL LEAGUE

113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 255 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 2001

And facts relating to the structural bias common to corporate boards throughout America are also insufficient. (Aronson v. Lewis, supra, 473 A.2d at p. 815, fn. 8 ; cf. Kaplan v. … Seminaris v. Landa (Del.Ch. 1995) 662 A.2d 1350, 1353 [board’s appointment of a special litigation committee does not concede demand futility unless the board is not *591 independent].)

In re Harper

California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 2022

(People v. Brown et al., supra, E032616.) … (People v. Brown et al., supra, E032616.)

Geneneral Dynamics Corp. v. County of San Diego

108 Cal. App. 3d 132 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1980

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. County’s Appeal Each year the county assessor must identify and value all local property for state taxation (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 601). … Dist. v. Garrison, 191 Cal. 680, 692 (1923); L.A. City School Dist. v. Landier Inv. Co., 177 Cal.App.2d 744, 755 (1960).

General Dynamics NASSCO v. Cal. OSHA Board CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 2026

Filed 4/2/26 General Dynamics NASSCO v. Cal. … We granted the Board’s request that we take judicial notice of 24 prior Board decisions after reconsideration. (See Evid. Code, §§ 451, subd. (a), 452, subd. (c), 459; United Assn. Local Union 246, AFL-CIO v.

Coalition of County Unions v. L.A. County Bd. of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 2023

(People v. … In Reuter v.

McKamy v. Bd. of Tr. of Bakersfield

26 Cal. App. 315 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 1915

The proceeding is brought against the board of trustees of the city of Bakersfield; neither the court which rendered the decree, nor Dorris, the relator, being made a party herein. … See Camron v. Kenfield, 57 Cal. 550 ; Farmers’ Union v. Thresher, 62 Cal. 410 and Hobart v.

Sandhu v. Bd. of Admin. of CalPERS

California Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 2025

Sandhu cites Handler v. Board of Supervisors (1952) 39 Cal.2d 282 and Kennedy v. … (Handler v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 39 Cal.2d at p. 286; see id. at pp. 283-284.)

Littlefield v. Littlefield

California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 2024

(Park v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1057, 1060 (Park v. Board of Trustees).) “Anti-SLAPP procedure involves two steps. … WE CONCUR: BROWN, P. J.

People v. Pounds

168 Cal. App. 2d 756 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1959

(People v. Waxman, 114 Cal.App.2d 399, 408 [ 250 P.2d 339 ]; cf. People v. Monks, 133 Cal.App. 440, 447 [ 24 P.2d 508 ] ; People v. … (People v. Smith, supra, 103 Cal. 563, 566 ; cf. People v. Cline, 79 Cal.App.2d 11, 14 [ 179 P.2d 89 ] ; People v. Ruiz, 103 Cal.App.2d 146, 149 [ 229 P.2d 73 ].)

Cohn v. Isensee

45 Cal. App. 531 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1920

(Lambert v. Board of Trustees, 151 Ky. 725 , [Ann. Cas. 1915A, 180, 183, 152 S. … (Eaton v. Brown, 96 Cal. 371 , [ 31 Am. St. Rep. 225 , 17 L. R. A. 697, 31 Pac. 250 ]; Britton v. Board of Commrs., 129 Cal. 337, 342 , [51 L. R. A. 115, 61 Pac. 1115 ]; Spier v. Baker, 120 Cal. 370, 375 , [41 L. R.

Paterson v. Department of Motor Vehicles

171 Cal. App. 3d 1126 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1985

(Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 861 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ].) … (Purifoy v. State Board of Education (1973) 30 Cal.App.3d 187, 197 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 201 ].)

Braude v. Automobile Club of Southern Cal.

178 Cal. App. 3d 994 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1986

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … Interest v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 241 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 766 ], Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Company (1970) 396 U.S. 375 [ 24 L.Ed.2d 593 , 90 S.Ct. 616 ], and Hall v.

Conservatorship of Berry

210 Cal. App. 3d 706 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1989

(See, e.g., Serrano v. Priest (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25, 48 [ 141 Cal. … (See also Brown v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal. App.3d 189, 189-192 [ 173 Cal. Rptr. 803 ] to the same effect.

CEMEX v. State Water Resources Control Board CA2/2

California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 2025

Filed 12/4/25 CEMEX v. … (See FlightSafety Internat., Inc. v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Board (2023) 96 Cal.App.5th 712, 718; see also Lopez v.

Maynard v. State Personnel Bd.

67 Cal. App. 3d 233 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1977

While reviewing the evidence placed before the State Personnel Board, the superior court exercises the same function as this court. (Martin v. State Personnel Bd., supra; Neely v. … (Nightingale v. State Personnel Board, supra, 7 Cal.3d at pp. 514-516; Vielehr v. State Personnel Bd. (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 187, 196 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 852 ].) The judgment denying the petition is affirmed. Puglia, P.

Deputy Sheriffs' Assn. v. County of San Diego

233 Cal. App. 4th 573 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 2015

(Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1130.) … Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 534 [appellate court will not reach a constitutional question unless absolutely necessary to dispose of the matter before it]; Teachers' Retirement Bd. v.

Marquez v. MEDICAL BD. OF CALIFORNIA

182 Cal. App. 4th 548 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 2010

(Unnamed Physician v. Board of Trustees (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 607, 619 [ 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 309 ].) … (Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 977 [ 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 260 , 987 P.2d 727 ].) “An interpretation that renders related provisions nugatory must be avoided.” (Lungren v.

City of Los Angeles v. Silver

98 Cal. App. 3d 745 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1979

(Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners (1972) 7 Cal.3d 64 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 768 , 496 P.2d 840 ], app. dism. (1973) 409 U.S. 1121 [ 35 L.Ed.2d 254 , 93 S.Ct. 940 ] [skating rinks]; Carolina Lanes, Inc. v. … (Brown v. Brown (1971) 22 Cal.App.3d 82, 84 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 311 ].) 5 The orders appealed from are affirmed. Compton, J., and Beach, J., concurred.

Sierra Pac. Industries v. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

67 Cal. App. 3d 413 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 1977

Although petitioner argued before the board that the delay was not unreasonable, it has not renewed that contention here. … .” *415 In Adams v. Workers’ Comp.

Maddern v. Superior Court

22 Cal. App. 3d 998 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1972

(Scott v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, p. 83.) In Taylor v. … See also Jones v. Brown (1970) 13 Cal.App.3d 513, 520-521 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 651 ].)