Case law

Yaqub v. Salinas Valley Memorial Healthcare System

18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 2004

Appellant cites Haas v. … Brown, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted. 1 Appellant clarified at Ms Fair Hearing that Dr.

People v. County of Kern

62 Cal. App. 3d 761 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1976

This Board also notes that in footnote 8 of the opinion in People v. County of Kern, supra, the Court of Appeal approvingly cites the case of Hixon v. … This Board therefore deems it appropriate to note that the case of Hixon v.

Cook v. Civil Service Commission

178 Cal. App. 2d 118 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1960

City of Hawthorne, 104 Cal.App.2d 512 [ 231 P.2d 864 ]; Ahlstedt v. Board of Education, 79 Cal.App.2d 845 [ 180 P.2d 949 ] ; Brown v. State Personnel Board, 43 Cal.App.2d 70 [ 110 P.2d 497 ] ; Kelly v. … Board of Supervisors, 17 Cal.App.2d 360, 367-368 [ 62 P.2d 189 ], and Meyer v. Board of Public Works, 51 Cal.App.2d 456, 465 [ 125 P.2d 50 ].

County of San Diego v. Commission on State Mandates

7 Cal. App. 5th 12 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 2016

(California School Boards Assn. v. … [Citation.]' " (Doe v. Brown (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 408, 417-418.)

Thanawalla v. Bd. of Ed. for the Santa Monica Malibu USD CA2/1

California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 2023

Filed 3/22/23 Thanawalla v. … In Moreno v.

Tooker v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

22 Cal. App. 3d 643 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 1972

(Flood Control Dist. v. Wright, 213 Cal. 335, 348-349 [ 2 P.2d 168 ]; O'Farrell v. County of Sonoma, 189 Cal. 343, 348 [ 208 P. 117 ]; Peery v. … (Sutter Basin Corp. v. Brown, 40 Cal.2d 235, 241 [ 253 P.2d 649 ]; State School Bldg. Fin. Com. v. Betts, 216 Cal.App.2d 685, 691 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 258 ]; Jenkins v. Williams, 14 Cal.App. 89, 98 [ 111 P. 116 ].)

People v. Miller

52 Cal. App. 3d 666 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1975

The authority principally relied upon in Hitch (United States v. … Brown (H. C.), J„ and Scott, J„ concurred.

State Farm General Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

218 Cal. App. 4th 258 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 2013

Co. v. … (See, e.g., ICW Group v.

Lilienthal & Fowler v. Superior Court

12 Cal. App. 4th 1848 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1993

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 724 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 ].) As our Supreme Court stated in Building Industry Assn. v. … Wiler v.

Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & Emly

177 Cal. App. 4th 209 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2009

Martin v. … Brown v.

Eden Township Healthcare District v. Eden Medical Center

220 Cal. App. 4th 418 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 9, 2013

―In 2006, Sutter notified EMC‘s board, including the five District board members, that it would not build the contemplated replacement hospital. … Vance Brown, Inc. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 515, 523; Silverado Modjeska Recreation & Park Dist. v. County of Orange (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 282, 310.)

Gold v. Gold Realty Co.

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 2003

One such dispute is outlined in a July 8, 2001, letter from retired Associate Justice Zebrowski to Richard which states in part: “At the last Board meeting, the Board voted (with Richard dissenting) to contract for restricted … (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2003) ][ 9:737, p. 9(II)-48.9.)

RAMANATHAN v. Bank of America

66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2007

(See Wells Fargo Bank v. … Indeed, in Peatros v.

Mains v. Bd. of Barber Examiners

249 Cal. App. 2d 459 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1967

This is the third in a series of controversies involving the Board of Barber Examiners and the present or former owner of a barbershop at the corner of 20th and L Streets (2001 L-1129 20th) in Sacramento. (See Doyle v. … Board of Barber Examiners, 219 Cal.App.2d 504 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 349 ]; Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners, 244 Cal. App.2d 521 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 420 ].)

Sui v. Price

196 Cal. App. 4th 933 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 2011

Price claimed plaintiff was ineligible to view the record because he was not a board member. … (Rakestraw v.

Bryant v. Smith

57 Cal. App. 214 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1922

In the case of Cutting Packing Co. v. … (Chung Kee et al. v. Davidson, 73 Cal. 522 [ 15 Pac. 100 ].) In Lisenby v. Newton, 120 Cal. 571 [ 65 Am. St.

Hardy v. Stumpf

37 Cal. App. 3d 958 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1974

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. … Rts. v.

Santiago County Water District v. County of Orange

118 Cal. App. 3d 818 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 1981

In Brown v. … (See Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 260-261 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].)

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City & County of S.F.

California Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 2021

We adopt the reasoning of City and County of San Francisco v. … Howard Jarvis primarily relies on Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board (2018) 5 Cal.5th 898 (Boling).

People v. Albrexstondare

71 Cal. App. 339 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1925

In the case of People v. … Curry, 103 Cal. 548 [ 37 P. 503 ]; People v. Lang, 104 Cal. 368 [ 37 P. 1031 ]; People v. Anderson, 105 Cal. 35 [ 38 P. 513 ]; People v. Hertz, 105 Cal. 663 [ 39 P. 32 ]; People v.