Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.93s

  • Rivero v. Superior Court of S.F.

    54 Cal. App. 4th 1048 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1997

    Local Control Over Municipal Affairs Home rule charter cities, such as San Francisco (see Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 697, fn. 3 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 363 , 889 P.2d 557 ]; Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. … Amici curiae offer Dibb v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kirk v. Kirk

    243 Cal. App. 2d 580 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 1966

    BROWN, P. J. Respondent Charles R. Loveland was appointed by the superior court in August 1961 as receiver for the insolvent Kirk interests. He filed a receiver’s cash bond of $10,000. … At the hearing pursuant to the receiver’s accounting and application for discharge, the appellants, United States (District Collector of Internal Revenue) and the State of California (Department of Employment and State Board

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Spring v. Board. of Psychology CA1/5

    California Court of Appeal · May 13, 2015

    Filed 5/13/15 Spring v. … (Rand v. Board of Psychology (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 565, 574 (Rand).) “On appeal, we do not exercise our independent judgment.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In Re Ellis

    25 Cal. App. 2d 99 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1938

    (Brown v. City of Los Angeles, (1920) 183 Cal. 783, 787 [ 192 Pac. 716 ] ; Ex parte Quong Wo, (1911) 161 Cal. 220, 233 [ 118 Pac. 714 ] ; People v. Rogers, (1931) 112 Cal. App. 615, 618 [ 297 Pac. 924 ] ; A. F. … (See, also, Zahn v. Board of Public Works, (1925) 195 Cal. 497, 514 [ 234 Pac. 388 ] ; Miller v. Board of Public Works, (1925) 195 Cal. 477, 490 [ 234 Pac. 381 , 38 A. L. R. 1479] ; Sunny Slope Water Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rittenband v. Cory

    159 Cal. App. 3d 410 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1984

    .; Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855 , 861 . . .).” (Newland v. Board of Governors (1977) 19 Cal.3d 705, 711 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 620 , 566 P.2d 254 ].) 12 In Newland v. … Board of Trustees (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 314 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 472 ]; American Federation of Teachers College Guild v. Board of Trustees, supra, 63 Cal.App.3d 800 .)

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Residents for Adequate Water v. Redwood Valley County Water District

    34 Cal. App. 4th 1801 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1995

    (Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal (1941) 17 Cal.2d 280, 292 [ 109 P.2d 942 , 132 A.L.R. 715 ]; Karlin v. Zalta (1984) 154 Cal.App.3d 953, 979 [ 201 Cal.Rptr. 379 ].) … (Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 859 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 575 ]; see 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, supra, Actions, § 234, pp. 264-266.)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Local Joint Executive Board of Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union v. 3539 Century, Inc.

    47 Cal. App. 3d 821 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1975

    Third, the court reaffirmed the policy recognized in NLRB v. … As the court explained in Golden Gate Bottling Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Roe v. State Personnel Board CA1/5

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 6, 2015

    Filed 2/6/15 Roe v. … Roe V On remand from Roe III, the superior court issued a peremptory writ of mandate to the Board.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Amalgamated Transit Union v. San Joaquin Reg. Transit Dist.

    California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 2019

    B. v. … (People v. Brown (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322, 335.) The Union’s position gives full effect to both section 50150 and section 99159 without raising constitutional concerns.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tarkington v. Cal. Victim Compensation Bd. CA2/1

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2026

    Filed 1/30/26 Tarkington v. Cal. Victim Compensation Bd. … Code, § 788; People v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Amalgamated Transit Union v. San Joaquin Reg. Transit Dist.

    California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 2019

    B. v. … (People v. Brown (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322, 335.) The Union’s position gives full effect to both section 50150 and section 99159 without raising constitutional concerns.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wu v. Public Employment Relations Board CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 2022

    Filed 12/28/22 Wu v. … (Taylor v. Board of Trustees (1984) 36 Cal.3d 500, 504-505.) Indeed, the Board noted in St.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kaufman v. Franchise Tax Board CA1/5

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2023

    Filed 1/30/23 Kaufman v. … (Ibrahim v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (T.C. Mem. Dec. 2011-215) p. 6, citing Lee v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Pasadena v. State of California

    14 Cal. App. 4th 810 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1993

    (See No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 13 Cal.3d at p .79, fn. 6; McQueen v. Board of Directors (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1144 [ 249 Cal.Rptr. 439 ].) … (McQueen v. Board of Directors, supra, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 1144.)

    Disapproved on other grounds by Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior Court, 9 Cal. 4th 559 (1995)Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Whelpton v. Taylor

    81 Cal. App. 2d 949 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1947

    See Leeper v. Ginsberg, 58 Cal.App.2d 591, 595 [ 137 P.2d 859 ]; Caminetti v. Edward Brown & Sons, 23 Cal.2d 511, 514 [ 144 P.2d 570 ]; Murphy v. Krumm, 21 Cal.2d 846, 849 [ 136 P.2d 8 ]; Flint v. … Board of Medical Examiners, 72 Cal.App.2d 844 , and cases cited at page 846 [ 165 P.2d 694 ].

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chakmak v. H. J. Lucas Masonry, Inc.

    55 Cal. App. 3d 124 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1976

    (German Sav. and Loan Soc. v. McLellan (1908) 154 Cal. 710, 716 [ 99 P. 194 ]; Carlson, Collins, Gordon & Bold v. Banducci (1967) 257 Cal.App.2d 212, 222 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 915 ].) … Brown (G. A.), P.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Divino Plastic Surgery, Inc. v. Superior Court

    California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 2022

    (Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners (1961) 57 Cal.2d 74, 81 (Magit); accord, PM & R Associates v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 357, 369.) … (a); see Brown v. Superior Court (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 989, 993 (Brown) [nine-month period is calculated from initial trial date, not from date of trial setting conference].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Associated Students of North Peralta Community College v. Board of Trustees of Peralta Community College District

    92 Cal. App. 3d 672 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1979

    , the board being precluded from thereafter altering the road design. … In Wright , on the other hand, the resolution was by its terms broad enough to warrant the board’s changing its plan as the occasion required, without impairment of the underlying “contract” (Flood Control Dist. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Atashkar v. Cal. Horse Racing Board CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2015

    No. 34-2008-00024426-CL-OE-GDS) v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD, et al., Defendants and Respondents. … (See Baccus v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Marshall v. Wentz

    28 Cal. App. 540 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1915

    In Hassie v. … (Faull v. Alaska etc., Co. 14 Fed. 657 , 8 Sawy. 420 . See, also, Brown, v. Hitchcock, 36 Ohio St. 667 ; San Luis Obispo v. Gage, 139 Cal. 398, 405 , [ 73 Pac. 174 ]; Walter v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.