Case law

Ellis v. Ellis

101 Cal. App. 4th 400 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 2002

(Ellis v. Ellis, supra, B064936.) We cited In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 848 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 , 94 A.L.R.3d 164 ]. … (In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838, 842 .)

B.F.G. Builders v. Weisner & Coover Co.

206 Cal. App. 2d 752 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1962

(People v. Buellton Dev. Co., 58 Cal.App.2d 178, 181 [ 136 P.2d 793 ]; Howe v. Key System Transit Co., 198 Cal. 525, 533 [ 246 P. 39 ]; American Can Co. v. … Brown, J., and Stone, J., concurred. * Formerly Rules for the Superior Courts, rule 2 (e).

Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Pacific Southwest Airlines

128 Cal. App. 3d 898 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1982

Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred. … (Chavez v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1958) 49 Cal.2d 701, 702 [ 321 P.2d 449 ].) 7 Overruled on other grounds. (Breese v.

People v. Hale

232 Cal. App. 2d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1965

Tarshes or to the board of supervisors to the extent of their requests for help. … Brown (R. M.), J., concurred.

Harris v. Spinali Auto Sales, Inc.

202 Cal. App. 2d 215 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1962

(Sass v. Hank, 108 Cal.App.2d 207, 215 [ 238 P.2d 652 ]; Vierra v. Shaffer, 113 Cal.App.2d *220 768, 772 [ 248 P.2d 992 ]; Mitchel v. Brown, 43 Cal.App.2d 217, 221 [ 110 P.2d 456 ].) … Underwriters at Lloyds London, 185 Cal.App.2d 545, 548 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 276 ]; Estate of Freeman, 146 Cal.App.2d 49, 58 [ 303 P.2d 609 ] ; Mitchel v. Brown, supra, 43 Cal.App.2d 217, 222 .)

Moreland Investment Co. v. Superior Court

106 Cal. App. 3d 1017 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 1980

(Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 17 Cal.3d 259, 266, 267 ; Garrett v. Superior Court, supra, 11 Cal.3d 245 .) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Staniforth, J., concurred. 1 Code of Civil Procedure section 394 provides in relevant part:* 1 ...

City and County of S.F. v. All Persons Interested etc.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 2021

(c); Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) “Rulings on motions for summary judgment are reviewed de novo.” (Brown v. Mid-Century Ins. Co. (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 841, 850.) … Nowak bases this argument on Boling v. Public Employee Relations Board (2018) 5 Cal.5th 898 (Boling).

Resolute Insurance v. Municipal Court

11 Cal. App. 3d 1006 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1970

*1008 Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. The appeals by real party in interest, the People, and the Municipal Court of the Southern Judicial District of San Mateo County are from judgments on review by the superior court. … (See Board of Administration v. Ames, 215 Cal.App.2d 215, 222 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 917 ], hg. den.) The judgments are reversed.

People v. Gilchrist

133 Cal. App. 3d 38 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1982

(In re Gray (1978) 85 Cal.App.3d 255, 262 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 416 ]; In re Brown (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 647, 652 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 549 ].) … (People v. Robinson (1954) 43 Cal.2d 143, 145 [ 271 P.2d 872 ].)

Union of American Physicians & Dentists v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission

32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 547 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 2005

The Oklahoma case, City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations Board (Okla., July 5, 2005, No. 101,729) 2005 OK 55 [2005 Okla. … (See, e.g., Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles et. al. v. Philip E.

Fuimaono v. Samoan Congregational Christian Church of Oceanside

66 Cal. App. 3d 80 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1977

Church in U.S. v. Samoan Congregational etc. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred.

Olson v. State Personnel Board CA3

California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 2013

Filed 7/23/13 Olson v. … (See Flowers v.

Pan Pacific Properties, Inc. v. County of Santa Cruz

81 Cal. App. 3d 244 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1978

On September 16, 1969, the County Board of Supervisors (hereafter Board) passed resolution No. 1461, rezoning the properties “C-3-D” or “Highway Commercial.” … (Id., at pp. 512, 518; see also Brown v. City of Fremont (1977) 75 Cal.App.3d 141 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 46 ].) In Eldridge v.

El Tejon Cattle Co. v. County of San Diego

252 Cal. App. 2d 449 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 1967

(City of Long Beach v. Board of Supervisors, 50 Cal.2d 674, 679 [ 328 P.2d 964 ].) … There does not remain any proceeding to be remanded to that board. The judgment is reversed with directions to enter judgment in favor of defendant. *464 Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred.

Save our Access etc. v. Watershed Conservation Authority

California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 2021

The board then voted 4 to 1 to certify the EIR (Ms. Mendelsohn voting no). 5. … The court in San Franciscans for Livable Neighborhoods v.

Simi Corporation v. Garamendi

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 207 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 2003

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board has had procedures allowing it to dismiss a claim adjudication case for lack of prosecution for several decades. (Moran v. … While the board had inherent power to dismiss a claim for various reasons, including abandonment (Moran v.

Alcoser v. County of San Diego

111 Cal. App. 3d 907 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 1980

(Stockton Civic Theatre v. Board of Supervisors (1967) 66 Cal.2d 13, 22 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 658 , 423 P.2d 810 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P.

Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. Eisenberg

California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 2025

(a); see also Whitney v. Montegut (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 906, 913 [petition filed by executive director of Medical Board of California, was, pursuant to § 446, “deemed verified”]; Murrieta Valley Unified School Dist. v. … (Board of Supervisors v. McMahon (1990) 219 Cal.App.3d 286, 295, fn. omitted (McMahon).)

In Re Marriage of Peterson

41 Cal. App. 3d 642 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 5, 1974

(See also In re Marriage of Jafeman, 29 Cal.App.3d 244, 261 [ 105 Cal.Rptr. 483 ]; Berry v. Board of Retirement, 23 Cal.App.3d 757, 759 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 549 ].) … (Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1, 4 [ 147 P. 1168 ].) However, the Civil Code was amended to solve that problem. (See Brown v. Barham, 242 Cal.App.2d 696, 703-704 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 718 ].)

People v. Rissman

154 Cal. App. 2d 265 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1957

(People v. MacEwing, 45 Cal.2d 218, 224-225 [ 288 P.2d 257 ]; People v. … Also see People v. Powell, 50 Cal. App. 436, 443 [ 195 P. 456 ]; People v. Brown, 61 Cal.App. 748, 751 [ 216 P. 58 ] ; People v. Layman, 117 Cal.App. 476, 478 [ 4 P.2d 244 ]; People v.