Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.54s

  • People v. Brown CA2/5

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 2016

    Filed 9/15/16 P. v. … (People v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. County of Butte

    37 Cal. App. 3d 461 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 1974

    (Estate of Bristol (1943) 23 Cal.2d 221, 223 [ 143 P.2d 689 ]; Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Yakov v. … In Board of Supervisors v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.

    226 Cal. App. 3d 1382 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1991

    Proc., §§ 1286-1286.8; Morris v. Zuckerman (1968) 69 Cal.2d 686, 691 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 880 , 446 P.2d 1000 ]; Felner v. Meritplan Ins. Co. (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 540, 545 [ 86 Cal.Rptr. 178 ].) V. … (Cobler v. Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & Associates (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 518, 528-529 [ 265 Cal.Rptr. 868 ]; see Evid. Code, § 703.5.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stanchfield v. Hamer Toyota, Inc.

    37 Cal. App. 4th 1495 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1995

    The board of directors apparently adopted a resolution incorporating those directives at its meeting of July 9, 1990. A month later, the board summarily discharged appellant. … Equally distinguishable are two additional cases relied upon by appellant, Zellerino v. Brown (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1097 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 222 ] and Waicis v. Superior Court (1990) 226 Cal.App.3d 283 [ 276 Cal.Rptr. 45 ].

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Toyota of Visalia, Inc. v. Department of Motor Vehicles

    155 Cal. App. 3d 315 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1984

    The trial court is directed to modify its judgment accordingly and to remand the cause to the Board for further consideration in accordance with this opinion. Brown (G. A.), P. … (Bixby v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Montgomery

    67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 721 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 2007

    V, § 8, subd. (b).) The Board's parole decisions are governed by Penal Code section 3041 [4] and Board regulations. … While an accomplice is treated the same as the perpetrator of a crime for purposes of determining guilt and imposing sentence (e.g., People v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown CA2/8

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 2016

    Filed 9/21/16 P. v. … (People v. Hendrix (1997) 16 Cal.4th 508, 512-513.) The court was required to state its reasons to support its consecutive sentence. (People v. Powell, supra, 194 Cal.App.4th at p. 1297; People v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Am. Sheds, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

    78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 58 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 1998

    (ASI), and its parent corporation Browning-Ferris Services, Inc. … (GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. County of Alameda (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 992, 1001 [ 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 882 ]; Service America Corp. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of Rolling Hills Estates

    225 Cal. App. 2d 525 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1964

    Browne, 135 Cal. 649 [ 67 P. 1082 ], fixing salaries of court reporters in counties of the thirtieth class (Ventura); Consolidated Printing & Publishing Co. v. … As pointed out in People v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF NEEDLES v. City Council of City of Needles

    208 Cal. App. 2d 599 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1962

    The leading cases are Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 [ 22 P. 1042 ]; Saxton v. Board of Education, 206 *606 Cal. 758 [ 276 P. 998 ], and Holbrook v. … Board of Education, supra, 37 Cal.2d 316 [ 231 P.2d 853 ].” The court, in Kennedy v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Stein

    145 Cal. App. 2d 381 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 1956

    In People v. … Proe., § 1003; Badella v. Miller, supra; Maxwell v. Perkins, 116 Cal.App.2d 752, 757 [ 255 P.2d 10 ].)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Hammond Lumber Co. v. Goldberg

    125 Cal. App. 120 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1932

    In Hamilton v. … Co., Inc., v. Colley, 79 Cal.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Castro v. Civil Service Board CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 2013

    Filed 12/12/13 Castro v. … (Blake v. State Personnel Board (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 553, italics added.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lasociete Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutaelle v. Kuchel

    75 Cal. App. 2d 770 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1946

    In Brown v. … The Supreme Court held that the society was not a charitable or benevolent society within the meaning of section 1313 of the Civil Code and rested the decision on the Brown case. In La Societe Francaise v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Scott

    34 Cal. App. 3d 702 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1973

    In Gagnon v. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Union Oil Co. v. City of Los Angeles

    227 Cal. App. 2d 608 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1964

    State Board of Equalization, 329 U.S. 69 ( 67 S.Ct. 156 , 91 L.Ed. 80 ); Matson Nav. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 136 Cal.App.2d 577 ( 289 P.2d 73 ); A. G. Spaulding & Bros. v. … (Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of Equalization, 329 U.S. 69 [ 67 S.Ct. 156 , 91 L.Ed. 80 ]; Gough Industries, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 746 [ 336 P.2d 161 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Crupi v. City of Los Angeles

    219 Cal. App. 3d 1111 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1990

    As described by the court in Baggett v. … (Browning v. Block (1985) 175 Cal.App.3d 423, 429 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 763 ].)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Crockett

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 2015

    (People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 319 (Brown).) … (Brown, at pp. 317-318, 325.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rambo v. Mattox

    225 Cal. App. 2d 185 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1964

    BROWN (Gerald), J. Irene Mattox, Auditor-Controller of Imperial County (hereinafter called appellant) appeals from an order of the superior court issuing a writ of mandate to compel her to deliver a warrant to C. J. … The board of supervisors appropriated the funds with which the claim could be paid.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sierra Investment Corp. v. County of Sacramento

    252 Cal. App. 2d 339 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 5, 1967

    The petition was denied by the board and this suit followed. … As said in Wicklund v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.