Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

0.87s

  • People v. Clagg

    197 Cal. App. 2d 209 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1961

    The only portion of the ironing board which was not charred was where the iron *212 had rested. … Brown, J., and Stone, J., concurred.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. 1027 Oliver Road Associates CA1/2

    California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 2021

    (Ballard v. … Brown v. 1027 Oliver Road Assocs. (A152598) 7

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lucchesi v. City of San Jose

    104 Cal. App. 3d 323 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1980

    Co. (1895) 109 Cal. 315 [ 41 P. 1093 ]; Simons v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 924, 935 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 484 ]; Brown v. … Rodriguez (1973) 411 U.S. 1, 33-34 [ 36 L.Ed.2d 16, 42-44 , 93 S.Ct. 1278 ] D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 11 Cal.3d at p. 17 ; Sail’er Inn, Inc. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • In re McGhee

    California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 2019

    (See, e.g., Coleman v. Brown (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2014, No. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK DAD (PC)) 2014 U.S.Dist. Lexis 17913.) … While Proposition 57 undoubtedly was intended to maintain the inmate population at a level that complies with the federal court order (see Coleman v. Brown, supra, 2014 U.S.Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blair v. Security Trust & Savings Bank

    46 Cal. App. 2d 665 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 1941

    Prior to the time here in question financial difficulties had led to the placing of representatives of the creditors upon the board of directors of this corporation. … The deal was closed on March 4, 1937, at which time the school property was all conveyed to Brown’s corporation, the new trust deed for $114,000 was delivered to the bank, and Brown took possession of the property.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bartman v. Estate of Bartman

    83 Cal. App. 3d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1978

    Do the subsequent developments o/Brown v. … The fact that in 1973 Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Santa Clara County Environmental Health Ass'n v. County of Santa Clara

    173 Cal. App. 3d 74 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1985

    (Nestle v. … The Board of Supervisors further finds that it has fully complied with the requirements of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. [1] Section 2: [1] Notwithstanding the provisions of the Ordinance NS-5.83, all salaries for all classifications

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Service Employees International Union v. Superior Court

    137 Cal. App. 3d 320 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1982

    The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. … The examples given of the application of this power are Adams v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jacobs v. Freeman

    104 Cal. App. 3d 177 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1980

    (Brown v. Superior Court (1949) 34 Cal.2d 559, 564 [ 212 P.2d 878 ], quoted with approval in Murphy v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1976) 17 Cal.3d 937, 940 [ 132 Cal.Rptr. 424 , 553 P.2d 584 ]; see also Schoolcraft v. … (See, for example, Rodriguez v. Barnett, supra, 52 Cal.2d 154, 160-161 ; Mattei v. Hopper, supra, 51 Cal.2d 119, 122-123 ; Larwin-Southern California, Inc. v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • In re David

    202 Cal. App. 4th 675 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 2012

    (See Samson v. … Brown (1982) 32 Cal.3d 236, 239 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 30 , 651 P.2d 274 ]) and amended by initiative in 2008 as the “Victims’ Bill of Rights Act of 2008: Marsy’s Law” (see Kling v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • People v. Sheldon

    254 Cal. App. 2d 174 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1967

    (E.g People v. Stenchever (1967) 249 Cal. App.2d 74, 78 [57 Cal.Rptr. 14] ; People v. Blunt (1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 200, 204 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 440 ] ; People v. … His possession of the marijuana in the brown box cannot be separated from the offer to sell.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Wimber v. Scott

    California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 2025

    (Brown v. Crandall (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1, 8.) I. … (Arce v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nadler v. Schwarzenegger

    41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 92 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 2006

    (See Silver v. Brown (1965) 63 Cal.2d 270, 273-274 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 405 P.2d 132 ]; see also Davis v. Bandemer, supra, 478 U.S. at p. 125 [92 L.Ed.2d at pp. 100-101].) … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at pp. 180-181; People v. Rodriguez, supra, 66 Cal.App.4th at p. 166 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Bd. of Civil Service Comrs. of the City of Los Angeles

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 2024

    (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; see Brown v. Upside Gading, LP (2019) 42 Cal.App.5th 140, 144.) 2. … Brown (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 1114, 1132 [same].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mundell v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control

    211 Cal. App. 2d 231 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1962

    (Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 238, 246 [ 340 P.2d 1 ] ; Marini v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 177 Cal.App.2d 785, 786 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 714 ].) … (See Swegle v. State Board of Equalization, 125 Cal.App.2d 432, 438 [ 270 P.2d 518 ]; Givens v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 176 Cal.App.2d 529, 533-534 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 446 ].)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Uribe

    12 Cal. App. 4th 1432 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1993

    Brown spotted Uribe’s truck in La Jolla and followed it to a residence on “C” Street. … Contreras understood Brown was interested in narcotics in the vehicle. Verduzco also understood Brown was interested in narcotics, and Verduzco (a self-described “busybody”) went to cover the call.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Thein v. State Personnel Board CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 2014

    (American Funeral Concepts v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 303, 311 (American Funeral).) … This statute “establishes a one-year statute of limitations on lawsuits seeking review of State Personnel Board decisions.” (Ng v. State Personnel Bd. (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 600, 606-607; see also Sinclair v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Burlingame v. County of San Mateo

    103 Cal. App. 2d 885 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1951

    An alternative writ issued, halting board action until further order. … (Braun v. Brown, 13 Cal.2d 130, 133 [ 87 P.2d 1009 ].) Accordingly the appeal from the judgment dismissing the main case is dismissed. The appeal from the order denying permission to intervene is affirmed. Nourse, P.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Trujillo v. City of Los Angeles

    276 Cal. App. 2d 333 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 23, 1969

    (Abbott v. City of Los Angeles, 178 Cal.App.2d 204 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 127 ] ; Gresham v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.App .2d 664 [ 112 P.2d 965 ]; Shade v. Board of Trustees, 21 Cal.App.2d 725 [ 70 P.2d 490 ]; Kramer v. … Board of Police Comrs. 39 Cal.App. 396 [ 179 P. 216 ].) In Thompson v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Yeoman v. Department of Motor Vehicles

    273 Cal. App. 2d 71 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1969

    DiGenova v. State Board of Education, 45 Cal.2d 255 [ 288 P.2d 862 ]; Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind, 67 Cal.2d 536 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 21 ,432 P.2d.717].) … Brown, P.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.