Case law

Royal Globe Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

84 Cal. App. 3d 287 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1978

We do not consider whether the board abused its discretion, for reconsideration could not under any circumstances have been granted. … (c); Strumsky v. San Diego Employees Retirement Assn. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 28 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 805 , 520 P.2d 29 ].)

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

9 Cal. App. 3d 783 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1970

In Edson v. Industrial Acc. … In the leading case of Lambert v.

De Carli v. Board of Police & Fire Commissioners

27 Cal. App. 792 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1915

On the authority of Humburg v. The Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of San Jose et al., (Civ. No. 1313), ante, p. 6, [ 148 Pac. 802 ], this day decided, the judgment herein is reversed. Chipman, P.

People's Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State Franchise Tax Board

110 Cal. App. 2d 696 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1952

(Dominguez Land Corp. v. Daugherty, 196 Cal. 468, 484 [ 238 P. 703 ]; In re Peppers, 189 Cal. 682, 685-688 [ 209 P. 896 ]; Hewitt v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 148 Cal. 590, 591-595 [ 84 P. 39 , 113 Am. … In Dominguez Land Corp. v.

In Re Marriage of Shattuck

134 Cal. App. 3d 683 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 3, 1982

(Phillipson v. Board of Administration (1970) 3 Cal.3d 32, 46 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ] [disap *686 proved on other grounds in In re Marriage of Brown, 15 Cal.3d 838, 851, fn. 14 ].) … (Smith v. Lewis (1975) 13 Cal.3d 349, 361 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 621 , 530 P.2d 589 , 78 A.L.R.3d 231 ] [disapproved on other grounds In re Marriage of Brown, 15 Cal. 3d 838, 851, fn. 14 ]; and see Waite v.

Leo J. Meyberg Co. v. Board of Trade

172 Cal. App. 2d 415 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1959

some 376 mercantile dealers; that plaintiff is a member of the board; that the board is supported by monthly dues paid by its members; that the board is maintained “for the purpose of furnishing and which does furnish its … (Taliaferro v. Salyer, 162 Cal.App.2d 685, 692 [ 328 P.2d 799 ]; Spencer v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 152 Cal.App.2d 797 [ 313 P.2d 900 ].)

William Dal Porto & Sons, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

191 Cal. App. 3d 1195 · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1987

At a minimum, on this remand the Board should afford Dal Porto an opportunity to present legal arguments and to argue orally before the Board in advance of the Board’s decision on the appropriate remedy. (See Conti v. … (See, e.g., Weinberger v. Salfi (1975) 422 U.S. 749 [ 45 L.Ed.2d 522 , 95 S.Ct. 2457 ]; Cleveland Board of Education v. La Fleur (1974) 414 U.S. 632 [ 39 L.Ed.2d 52 , 94 S.Ct. 791 ]; Vlandis v.

In Re Marriage of Alarcon

149 Cal. App. 3d 544 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 1983

(Betts v. Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859, 863 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 158 , 582 P.2d 614 ]; In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 845 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 , 94 A.L.R.3d 164 ]; Dryden v. … Board of Pension Commrs. (1972) 6 Cal.2d 575, 579 [ 59 P.2d 104 ]; Kern v.

National Distillers Products Corp. v. Board of Equalization

83 Cal. App. 2d 35 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1947

The plaintiff’s petition for a redetermination of the tax was denied by the defendant board. … State Board of Equali *38 zation, 11 Cal.2d 156 [ 78 P.2d 731 , 117 A.L.R. 838 ], and in United States v. Lee, 153 Pla. 94 [ 13 So.2d 919 ]. In Western Lithograph Co. v.

Big Rock Mesas Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors

73 Cal. App. 3d 218 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1977

person, to the board of supervisors. … Co. v. Sinclair (1963) 214 Cal.App.2d 778, 781-782 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 769 ]; Riggins v. Board of Education (1956) 144 Cal.App.2d 232, 236-237 [ 300 P.2d 848 ]; Corcoran v. S. F. etc.

Goleta Educators Assn. v. Dall'Armi

68 Cal. App. 3d 830 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1977

(See San Joaquin County Employees’ Assn., Inc. v. … Although the procedures outlined under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act differ from those under the Winton Act (compare Gov. Code, § 3500 et seq., with former Ed. Code, § 13080 et seq.; see Westminster Sch. Dist. v.

San Diego Electric Railway Co. v. State Board of Equalization

89 Cal. App. 2d 267 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1948

Also see California Motor Transport Co., Ltd. v. State Board of Equalization, 31 Cal.2d 217 [ 187 P.2d 745 ], Southern California Freight Lines v. … State Board of Equalization, 72 Cal.App.2d 26 [ 163 P.2d 776 ], and Winkler Trucking Co. v. McAhren, 60 Ariz. 225 [ 133 P.2d 757, 759 ].

Valero v. Board of Retirement of Tulare County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

205 Cal. App. 4th 960 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 2012

Retirement Board (1976) 16 Cal.3d 745 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 289 , 548 P.2d 689 ]; County of Alameda v. Board of Retirement (1988) 46 Cal.3d 902 [ 251 Cal.Rptr. 267 , 760 P.2d 464 ].) … (Wieser v. Board of Retirement (1984) 152 Cal.App.3d 775, 783 [ 199 Cal.Rptr. 720 ].)

P. v. Brown CA5

California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 2013

Filed 3/14/13 P. v. … DF10417A) v. HERBERT BROWN, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

Edgar v. Oakland Museum Advisory Commission

36 Cal. App. 3d 73 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1973

In the early case of Wickersham v. … Brown, May 5, 1960.)

County of San Diego v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

184 Cal. App. 4th 396 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 2010

The Department adopted the decision as its own, and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (Board) affirmed the decision. … (a); City of Berkeley v.

Walsh v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement System

4 Cal. App. 4th 682 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1992

(See Silver v. Brown (1965) 63 Cal.2d 270, 275-276 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 405 P.2d 132 ].) … (Dodge v. Board of Education, supra, 302 U.S. at pp. 78-81 [82 L.Ed. at pp. 61-63]; Phelps v. Board of Education, supra, 300 U.S. at p. 323 [ 81 L.Ed. at p. 677 ].)

Conservatorship of Becerra

175 Cal. App. 4th 1474 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 2009

(Winikow v. … (Moyal v.

North Gualala Water Co. v. State Water Resources Control Board

43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2006

(See People v. … (Tisher v.

French Art Cleaners v. State Board of Dry Cleaners

88 Cal. App. 2d 45 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1948

It appears from the record that acting pursuant to sections 9563-9566 of the Business and Professions Code (Stats. 1945, pp. 2847-8) the defendant and appellant State Board of Dry Cleaners established a minimum price scale … The Supreme Court said in Food & Grocery Bureau v.