Case law

Akin v. Board of Education of Riverside Unified School District

262 Cal. App. 2d 161 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1968

(See Finot v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 250 Cal.App.2d 189 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 520 ].) … (Finot v. Pasadena City Board of Education, supra; see also Blackwell v. Issaquena County Board of Education, 363 F.2d 749 ; cf. Burnside v. Byars, 363 F.2d 744 .)

Prudential Insurance of America v. State Board of Equalization

21 Cal. App. 4th 458 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1993

Co. v. … SBE cites Elfstrom v. New York Life Ins.

Veguez v. Governing Board of Long Beach Unified School District

127 Cal. App. 4th 406 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 2005

(California Teachers’ Assn. v. Governing Board (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 735, 741 [ 193 Cal.Rptr. 650 ].) … Co. v.

Philips & Ober Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization

231 Cal. App. 3d 723 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 1991

(Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board (1963) 60 Cal.2d 177 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 383 P.2d 409 ]; see also Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal (1941) 17 Cal.2d 280 [ 109 P.2d 942 , 132 A.L.R. 715 ].) … (Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 60 Cal.2d at 181 .)

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

19 Cal. App. 4th 1645 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1993

We shall affirm the Board’s decision denying reconsideration. … In Gonzalez v. Workmen’s Comp.

Paterson v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTECITO UNION SCH. DIST.

157 Cal. App. 2d 811 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1958

A board of school trustees is an administrative agency created by statute and invested only with the powers expressly conferred by the Legislature (Grigsby v. … Co. v.

West Coast Home Improvement Co. v. Contractors' State Licence Board

72 Cal. App. 2d 287 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1945

(Dare v. Board of Medical Exam *298 iners, 21 Cal.2d 790, 795 [ 136 P.2d 304 ]; Russell v. Miller, 21 Cal.2d 817, 819 [ 136 P.2d 318 ].) … (Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534, 538 [ 110 P.2d 992 ].)

Rae v. Bay Area Rapid Transit Supervisory & Professional Ass'n

114 Cal. App. 3d 147 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1980

(National Labor Relations Board v. Andrew Jergens Co. (9th Cir. 1949) 175 F.2d 130, 133 ; see generally Morris, The Developing Labor Law (1971) pp. 404-409.) … (Labor Board v. General Motors (1963) 373 U.S. 734 [ 10 L.Ed.2d 670 , 83 S.Ct. 1453 ]; Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn (1963) 373 U.S. 746, 757 [ 10 L.Ed.2d 678, 685-686 , 83 S.Ct. 1461 ].)

Husband v. Superior Court

128 Cal. App. 444 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1932

In People v. Brown, 81 Cal. App. 226 [ 253 Pac. 735, 745 ], we observed: “As was said in People v. … Quoting from the opinion of Judge Bynum, in Lewis v. Board of Commrs., 74 N. C. 199 : “None but witnesses have any business before them. . . .

Lusardi Construction Co. v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Board

1 Cal. App. 4th 639 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1991

The Board recognized that safety orders are to be liberally construed to promote safety. (Carmona v. Division of Industrial Safety, supra, 13 Cal.3d at p. 313 .) … However, contrary common practice does not render the Board’s interpretation of a regulation clearly erroneous. (Bendix Forest Products Corp. v.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

119 Cal. App. 3d 193 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 1981

(Litzmann v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 266 Cal.App.2d 203, 204 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 731 ]; Nat. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1943) 58 Cal.App.2d 508, 509 [ 136 P.2d 815 ]; Laue v. Workers’ Comp. … (See Alford v. Industrial Accident Com. (1946) 28 Cal.2d 198, 199-201 [ 169 P.2d 641 ]; Nat. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com., supra, 58 Cal.App.2d at p. 509 ; Neal v. Industrial Acc.

County of San Diego v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2

148 Cal. App. 3d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1983

v. … As stated in Board of Supervisors v.

Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. State Board of Equalization

238 Cal. App. 2d 372 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1965

State Board of Equalization, 199 Cal.App.2d 662, 668 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 800 ]; Bank of America v. State Board of Equalization, 209 Cal.App.2d 780, 793 [26 Cal.Rptr. 348]; Whittell v. … Franchise Tax Board, 231 Cal.App.2d 278, 283 [ 41 Cal.Rptr. 673 ]; Pacific Pipeline Constr. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 49 Cal.2d 729, 736 [ 321 P.2d 729 ].)

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

39 Cal. App. 3d 532 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1974

As said in People v. … Marchica v. State Board of Equalization (1951) 107 Cal.App.2d 501 [ 237 P.2d 725 ], a sales tax case, is not in point as the issue was not the same as in the instant case.

County of Stanislaus v. County of Stanislaus Assessment Appeals Board

213 Cal. App. 3d 1445 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1989

By challenging the validity of the premise upon which the Board relied in reaching its decision, the County has presented this court with a question of law. (Bret Harte Inn, Inc. v. … (General Dynamics Corp. v.

Los Angeles County Employees Ass'n v. County of Los Angeles

168 Cal. App. 3d 683 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 1985

(Glendale City Employees’ Assn., Inc. v. … It is clear that under Government Code section 3505.1, 2 the fringe benefit MOU was tentative and not binding until it was approved by the board of supervisors. (Bagley v.

San Diego Tavern & Restaurant Ass'n v. Local Joint Executive Board

174 Cal. App. 2d 246 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 5, 1959

The Board may thereupon insert said provision in this contract.” … (Merlino v. Fresno Macaroni Mfg. Co., 74 Cal.App.2d 120, 126 [3] [ 168 P.2d 182 ]; Stenzor v. Leon, 130 Cal.App.2d 729, 735 [ 279 P.2d 802 ].)

County of Los Angeles v. Tax Appeals Board No. 2

267 Cal. App. 2d 830 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1968

City of Santa Barbara, 214 Cal.App.2d 626, 630-631 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 558 ]; also Allen v. Humboldt County Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal.App.2d 877, 882 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 232 ]; People v. … [Citations.] ” (Koehn v. State Board of Equalization, 50 Cal.2d 432, 435 [ 326 P.2d 502 ].)

Benavides v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Specialty Risk Services

227 Cal. App. 4th 1496 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 18, 2014

ADJ4322447) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD et al., Respondents. PROCEEDING to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. … (See Sully- Miller Contracting Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

Redwood Empire Publishing Co. v. State Board of Equalization

207 Cal. App. 3d 1334 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1989

Comm’n (1980) 447 U.S. 530, 538 [ 65 L.Ed.2d 319, 328 , 100 S.Ct. 2326 ]; Carey v. Brown (1980) 447 U.S. 455, 462 [ 65 L.Ed.2d 263, 270-271 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 ].) … Pattern Co. v.