Case law

Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board v. Zweigle

130 Cal. App. 3d 337 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1982

Facts On September 27, 1974, Zweigle, a licensed general building contractor, signed a memorandum agreement with Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board (conference board), a voluntary unincorporated association … On August 8, the conference board filed a petition for confirmation of the arbitration award in the Superior Court of San Francisco County.

Sanchez v. City of Los Angeles

45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 188 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 2006

Under the Los Angeles City Charter, the Board of Rights does not have the authority to prescribe a penalty of a reduction in pay grade. (Brown v. … (Brown v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 102 Cal.App.4th at p. 166 .) Following the issuance of Brown , the Department revised its appeal procedures in a new administrative order dated August 25, 2003.

People v. Brown CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 2015

Filed 4/9/15 P. v. … Brown was sentenced to a total term of five years in prison. In addition the court imposed a $500 sex offender fine pursuant to section 290.3. Brown appeals challenging only the sex offender fine.

Acapulco Restaurants, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

67 Cal. App. 4th 575 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1998

In Provigo Corp. v. … (Hogoboom v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 653, 659 [ 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 254 ]; Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. Clark (1943) 22 Cal.2d 287, 292 [ 140 P.2d 657 , 147 A.L.R. 1028 ]; People ex rel. Younger v.

Bekins Moving & Storage Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

137 Cal. App. 3d 665 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1982

Petitioner concedes that California case law has been quite liberal in finding that various documents filed with the Board may be considered as petitions to reopen (Zurich Ins. Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. … (Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com. (1928) 203 Cal. 522, 532 [ 265 P. 195 ].)

People v. Chlad

6 Cal. App. 4th 1719 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1992

First, the power may be exercised only upon the court’s own motion, or upon recommendation of the Director of Corrections (Director) or the Board of Prison Terms (Board). … (People v. Druschel (1982) 132 Cal.App.3d 667, 668-669 [183 *1726 Cal.Rptr. 348]; see also People v.

County of Santa Barbara v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

53 Cal. App. 3d 820 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1975

Although the language of section 4903 is permissive, it is settled that the Board may not disallow or reduce a lien claim that fits one of the categories of the section. (Bryant v. Industrial Acc. … See Del Carlo v. County of Sonoma, 245 Cal.App.2d 36 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 771 ]; County of Kings v. Scott, 190 Cal.App.2d 218 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 893 ]; County of L.A. v. Security First Nat.

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 205 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 2005

Guarantee Assn. v. Workers’ Comp. … (See, e.g., Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v.

Reich, Adell, Crost & Perry v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

99 Cal. App. 3d 225 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1979

The appeals board may determine what constitutes such reasonable amount.” The purpose of Labor Code section 4906 is to protect claimants before the appeals board from the exaction of excessive fees. (Coviello v. … Appeals Bd. v. Small Claims Court (1973) 35 Cal.App.3d 643, 646 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 6 ]; Koker v. Elk Brass Mfg. Co. (appeals board en banc opinion, 1971) 36 Cal.Comp.Cases 292, 294.)

Bigge Crane & Rigging Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

188 Cal. App. 4th 1330 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 2010

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) sustained an award of additional compensation to Hunt under Labor Code section 4553, 1 concluding his injuries were caused by the “serious and willful misconduct” of the operator … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Richard Boyd Industries, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 520 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2001

Co. v. … The court in People v.

Cal-Nat Airways, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

268 Cal. App. 2d 93 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1968

Such a declaration is comparable to one that the board relied upon certain evidence, a declaration held inadequate in Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … In its further consideration of this matter, the board should reexamine the record in the light of the principles of insurance law enunciated in Granco Steel, Inc. v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

In Re Marriage of Freiberg

57 Cal. App. 3d 304 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1976

Waite, supra, 6 Cal.3d 461, 469 ; Phillipson v. Board of Administration, supra, 3 Cal.3d 32, 46 ; In re Marriage of Martin, supra, 50 Cal.App.3d 581, 583-585 ; Bensing v. Bensing, supra, 25 Cal.App.3d 889, 893 ). … Brown (Gerald), P.

People v. Furman

30 Cal. App. 3d 454 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1973

The clerk gave Furman a baggage stub receipt for the large suitcase, and Furman walked in the direction of the boarding area, carrying the smaller brown suitcase. … This news was passed on to McLaughlin who intercepted Furman as he was about to board his flight.

Gray v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CTY. OF STANISLAUS

154 Cal. App. 2d 700 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1957

(Kennedy v. Ross, 28 Cal.2d 569 [ 170 P.2d 904 ] ; Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.) It is well recognized that a demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandate is a proper pleading both in the superior court (Lagiss v. … Appellants’ third contention is controlled by the well-established rule governing review of proceedings before local boards. (Livingston Rock etc. Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 43 Cal.2d 121 [ 272 P.2d 4 ].)

Flippin v. Los Angeles City Board of Civil Service Commisioners

55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 458 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 2007

The Board unanimously concluded that before discharging respondent, the DWP had satisfied the due process requirements imposed by Skelly v. … (See Civil Service Assn. v.

United States Lines, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

182 Cal. App. 3d 529 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 18, 1986

(a), italics added; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., 51 Cal.2d 640 [ 355 P.2d 672 ].) It is presumed that all gross receipts are subject to the tax until the contrary is established (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6091).”

George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

111 Cal. App. 3d 258 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 1980

In its opinion, Board stated that it did not think the attitude of the replacement workers was relevant to the issue. Board applied the standard enunciated in NLRB v. … The language of the court in Labor Board v. Express Pub.

People v. Brown CA4/2

California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2025

Filed 2/28/25 P. v. … Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo).

National Identification Systems, Inc. v. State Board of Control

11 Cal. App. 4th 1446 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1992

(See Pacific Bell v. California State & Consumer Services Agency, supra, 225 Cal.App.3d at p. 116.) NIS claims the holding in Konica Business Machines U.S.A., Inc. v. … This interpretation of the evidence, however, is contrary to the Board’s interpretation. *1461 This factual issue is subject to the substantial evidence test both in the superior court and here. (Lowe v.