The opinion
Filed 2/28/25 P. v. Brown CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E083510
v. (Super.Ct.No. FVA701587)
TERENCE DION BROWN, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Michael Camber,
Judge. Dismissed.
Michelle T. LiVecchi-Raufi, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for
Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.
1
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Terence Dion Brown appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for
resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable
issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo).
On December 20, 2024, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating
no arguable issues had been identified; (2) as a case arising from an order denying
postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent review of the
record, but we could do so in our discretion; and (3) in accordance with the procedures
set forth in Delgadillo, he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief raising any
argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant that if we did not
receive a brief within that 30-day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More
than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We
consider defendant's appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. (Delgadillo,
supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
2
DISPOSITION
The appeal is dismissed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
FIELDS
J.
We concur:
RAMIREZ
P. J.
MILLER
J.
3