Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.96s

  • Security First National Bank v. Board of Supervisors

    127 Cal. App. 115 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1932

    Proc.; Rauer v. Justice’s Court, 115 Cal. 84 [ 46 Pac. 870 ].) It has also been held that the return to the writ constitutes the answer as well as the evidence. (Rigdon v. Common Council, 30 Cal. … App. 107 [ 157 Pac. 513 ] ; Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors, 131 Cal. 364 [ 63 Pac. 663 , 82 Am. St. Rep. 350 ].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

    20 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,957 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1974

    As we have previously indicated, this Board policy and Attorney General opinion were held to be erroneous in King v. State Bd. of Equalization, supra, 22 Cal.App.3d *399 1006. … With proper findings the Board may well be entitled to judgment on its counterclaim and conceivably the Board may not be estopped to assert it. (See Market St. Ry. Co. v. Cal. St.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Thrifty Drug Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    95 Cal. App. 3d 937 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1979

    Turning first to the issue of postinjury raises, the only prior case to face this precise question is the appeals board’s decision in Moreno v. … (Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (Gregory) 87 Cal.App.3d 336, 347 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 368 ].) 4 Goytia also cited approvingly the Board decisions in Dole v. Industrial Acc.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Western & Southern Life Insurance v. State Board of Equalization

    99 Cal. App. 3d 410 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1979

    Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1970) 4 C.A.3d 21, hearing denied, at 34-35. “The stipulation of facts on file herein is adopted as the court’s findings of fact. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cole CA2/2

    California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 2025

    Filed 10/3/25 Brown v. … (Roberson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Keene v. Board of Directors of Veterans' Home

    49 Cal. App. 138 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1920

    (Brownlee v. Board of Directors, 22 Cal. App. 207 , [ 133 Pac. 1158 ].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport Board v. Superior Court

    63 Cal. App. 3d 482 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1976

    In 1972, petitioner board, a Texas corporation, entered into a contract with General Automated Systems of Texas, Inc. (Gastex), a California corporation, for the construction of an airport parking control system. … The matters relied on by Anderton were no more than those held insufficient in Sibley v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    253 Cal. App. 2d 62 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1967

    The appeals board relies upon Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 128 Cal.App.2d at pp. 813-815.) The appeals board contends that it was entitled to conclude that the claimant had progressed to an “odd lot” status.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    104 Cal. App. 3d 933 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1980

    (See Reyes v. Los Angeles Brick Co. (1966) 32 Cal.Comp.Cases 122; 1 Hanna, supra, § 9.04 [1] [c].) … In Kerley v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Serv-U-Garbage Co. v. Board of Health

    107 Cal. App. 386 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1930

    (Grumbach, v. Lelande, 154 Cal. 679, 683 [ 98 Pac. 1059 ] : French v. Cook, 173 Cal. 126, 130 [ 160 Pac. 411 ] ; Tulare Water Co. v. State Water Com., 187 Cal. 533 [ 202 Pac. 874 ].) … (Gibson v. McReynolds, 175 Cal. 263, 269 [ 165 Pac. 921 ]; Walberg v. Underwood, 39 Cal. App. 748, 752 [ 180 Pac. 55 ].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. State Board of Equalizer

    204 Cal. App. 3d 252 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 1988

    (See Alabama v. … (See Robinson v. Franchise Tax Board (1981) 120 Cal.App.3d 72, 82-83 [ 174 Cal.Rptr. 437 ].)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Colores v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

    130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 347 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 2003

    Here, plaintiff filed her claim with the State Board of Control on January 5, 1999. … (Spencer v.

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    194 Cal. App. 4th 809 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 2011

    We review such questions de novo (Boehm & Associates v. Workers’ Comp. … Appeals Bd. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 513, 515-516 [ 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 486 ]), although the Board’s interpretation of a labor statute or regulation is entitled to great weight (Smith v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    91 Cal. App. 3d 759 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1979

    The board majority distinguished the earlier panel decision in McDowell v. … Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    163 Cal. App. 4th 853 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 2008

    CIGA again petitioned the Board for reconsideration. … DISPOSITION The Board’s decision is affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Skyline Homes, Inc. v. Occupation Safety & Health Appeals Board

    120 Cal. App. 3d 663 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1981

    (Carmona v. Division of Industrial Safety (1975) 13 Cal.3d 303, 310 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 473 , 530 P.2d 161 ].) The regulations of the department are set forth in title 8 of the California Administrative Code. … (Carmona v. Division of Industrial Safety, supra, 13 Cal.3d at p. 310 .) In addition to the weight to be given the agency’s interpretation of its regulations, plaintiff is faced with a semantic difficulty.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Millview County Water District v. State Water Resources Control Board

    229 Cal. App. 4th 879 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 2014

    (Cassidy v. … (Simons v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors

    104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 326 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 2001

    (City of Carmel-by-the Sea v. Board of Supervisors (1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 229, 246 [ 227 Cal.Rptr. 899 ]; Environmental Planning & Information Council v. … (See, e.g., Erven v. Board of Supervisors (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 1004, 1012 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 285 ].)

    Cited 148 timesPublished
  • Public Employees' Retirement System v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    87 Cal. App. 3d 215 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1978

    Hockett v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 170 Cal.App.2d 155 , cited Kaiser Co. v. Industrial Acc. … In Gorman v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Talleur

    79 Cal. App. 3d 690 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1978

    Wks. v. Southern Pac. Trans. Co. (1973) 33 Cal.App.3d 960, 965 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 525 ]; City of La Mesa v. Tweed & Gambrell Mill (1956) 146 Cal.App.2d 762, 772 [ 304 P.2d 803 ].) In State of California v. … (See Patterson v. Central Coast Regional Com. (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 833 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 169 ]; Reed v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Com. (1975) 55 Cal.App.3d 889 [ 127 Cal.Rptr. 786 ]; CEEED v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.