Case law

Glen Hill Farm, LLC v. California Horse Racing Board

189 Cal. App. 4th 1296 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 2010

Construing the word decision “in the context of the statute as a whole and the entire scheme of law of which it is a part” (Singh v. … (Prospect Medical Group Inc. v. Northridge Emergency Medical Group (2009) 45 Cal.4th 497, 510 [ 87 Cal.Rptr.3d 299 , 198 P.3d 86 ].)

Victor Valley Transit Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

83 Cal. App. 4th 1078 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 2000

As a creature of the Legislature, the Board has no powers beyond those conferred on it. (State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1942) 20 Cal.2d 264, 266 [ 125 P.2d 42 ]; State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Ind. Acc. … Co. v.

Pasha v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

174 Cal. App. 3d 439 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1985

(Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 31 Cal.3d 124, 135 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 732 , 642 P.2d 792 ].) We conclude that the record supports the trial court’s decision. A. Brisson’s Surgery Dr. … (Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 184, 198 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 881 ].)

Easebe Enterprises, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

141 Cal. App. 3d 981 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1983

(Marina Point, Ltd. v. … New York State Liquor Authority v. Bellanca (1981) 452 U.S. 714 [ 69 L.Ed.2d 357 , 101 S.Ct. 2599 ]; California v. La Rue (1972) 409 U.S. 109 [ 34 L.Ed.2d 342 , 93 S.Ct. 390 ]; Morris v.

Pacific Coast Shipping Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

167 Cal. App. 3d 312 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1985

The instant appeal is prosecuted by the Franchise Tax Board (Board) from a summary judgment rendered in favor of respondent Pacific Coast Shipping Company (PCSC). … After paying this assessment with interest, PCSC filed for a refund and, upon the Board’s rejecting this claim, commenced the instant action.

Babcock-Bucklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

156 Cal. App. 3d 135 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1984

(Webb v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 28 Cal.3d at p. 630, fn. 5 .) … Conclusion The decision of the Board is annulled and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith. Franson, Acting P. J., and Hamlin, J., concurred. See Webb v. Workers' Comp.

Save Stanislaus Area Farm Economy v. Board of Supervisors

13 Cal. App. 4th 141 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1993

(Sierra Club v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 126 Cal.App.3d at p. 704 .) … FFA and the Board rely on American Federation of Labor v. Eu (1984) 36 Cal.3d 687 [ 206 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 686 P.2d 609 ] for this distinction. The initiative at issue in American Federation of Labor v.

Chittem v. Board of Directors of Veterans' Home

88 Cal. App. 795 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1927

THE COURT: The facts in this case are in all essential particulars the same as in the case of McOmie v. Board of Directors of the Veterans' Home of California, ante, p. 16 [ 263 Pac. 257 ].

McNeil's Inc. v. Contractors' State License Board

262 Cal. App. 2d 322 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1968

(Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534, 544 [ 110 P.2d 992 ]; Savelli v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 229 Cal.App.2d 124, 135 .) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred. The opinion in Lundborg v. Director of the Department of Professional etc.

Lewis-Westco & Co. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

136 Cal. App. 3d 829 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1982

Brown (1943) 317 U.S. 341 [ 87 L.Ed. 315 , 63 S.Ct. 307 ], or by reason of the application of the Twenty-first Amendment. (See Rice v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. … (California Liquor Dealers v. Midcal Aluminum, supra, 445 U.S. 97, 104, 106 [ 63 L.Ed.2d 233, 242, 243-244 ] [quoting Parker v. Brown, supra, 317 U.S. at p. 351 ( 87 L.Ed. at p. 326 )].)

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

1 Cal. App. 3d 812 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1969

(De Luna v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 258 Cal.App.2d 199 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 421 ]; Miller v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 258 Cal.App.2d 490 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 835 ].) … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 266 Cal.App.2d 196 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 915 ].)

Sam Andrews' Sons v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

162 Cal. App. 3d 923 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1984

Court’s decision in Labor Board v. … The Board’s access order was not upheld by the federal court in NLRB v.

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

245 Cal. App. 4th 1021 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 2016

ADJ7167413, Petitioner, ADJ7167333) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD et al., Respondents. … Co. v. Industrial Accident Com. (1965) 63 Cal.2d 60, 62, fn. 1; Colonial Ins. Co. v. Industrial Accident Com. (1946) 29 Cal.2d 79, 82; see General Accident Ins. Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.

Water Users Ass'n v. Board of Directors

34 Cal. App. 3d 131 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1973

Bd. of Supervisors, 43 Cal.App.2d 351 [ 110 P.2d 1076 ]; Pueblo Trading Co. v. El Camino Irr. Dist., 169 F.2d 312 ; May v. Board of Directors, 34 Cal.2d 125 [ 208 P.2d 661 ]; May v. … The district’s board stopped levying assessments to raise bond service costs until forced to resume by a decision of the state Supreme Court in July 1949. (May v. Board of Directors, supra, 34 Cal.2d 125 .)

Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

204 Cal. App. 4th 597 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 2012

Barrett petitioned to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) for reconsideration of that order and award. The WCAB denied reconsideration. … (Dahn v. Dahn (Mo.Ct.App. 2011) 346 S.W.3d 325, 339 ; Jackson v. 2109 Brandywine (2008) 180 Md.App. 535 [ 952 A.2d 304, 320-321 ]; Berhow v. The Peoples Bank (S.D.Miss. 2006) 423 F.Supp.2d 562, 568 .)

Farmers Underwriters Ass'n v. Franchise Tax Board

242 Cal. App. 2d 589 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1966

Proc., § 1858; Burks v. Poppy Constr. Co., 57 Cal.2d 463, 470 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 370 P.2d 313 ].) … Proc., § 1858; Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].)

People v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

28 Cal. App. 2d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1938

In April, 1931, pursuant to the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Fuel License Tax Act (Stats, of 1923, p. 572), as amended by the Statutes of 1931, page 107, said Brown and Sullivan applied to the state board of equalization … (First Congregational Church of Christ v. Lowrey, 175 Cal. 124—126 [ 165 Pac. 440 ].)

Lay v. State Board of Osteopathic Examiners

179 Cal. App. 356 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1960

Section 2174 was the subject of construction in the case of Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners of the State of Calif., 31 Cal.2d 30 [ 187 P.2d 1 ]. … It appears from this record that, in view of the provisions of section 2174 when applied to the record made before the board, the board was required to admit Doctor Lay to the examination.

Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

169 Cal. App. 3d 568 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1985

Co. v. California E. … (Chrysler Corp. v. California Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board, supra, 199 Cal.App.2d 683 ; Bodinson Mfg. Co. v. California E. Com., supra, 17 Cal.2d 321 .) We also conclude that the causation element is not met.

People v. Brown CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2026

Filed 3/20/26 P. v. … (People v.