Case law

People v. Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 2016

Filed 4/5/16 P. v. … CM040659) v. MICHAEL WALLACE BROWN, Defendant and Appellant.

Harris Transportation Co. v. Air Resources Board

32 Cal. App. 4th 1472 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1995

(Morton v. Board of Registered Nursing (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1560, 1566, fn. 5 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 502 ].) … In People v.

Wood v. Board of Fire Commissioners

50 Cal. App. 593 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1920

This is an original proceeding for a writ of prohibition against the board of fire commissioners of the city of Los Angeles.

Esquivel v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

178 Cal. App. 4th 330 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 13, 2009

.”]; Ginns v. … (Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

People v. Gerundo

112 Cal. App. 2d 863 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1952

Goodnow and endorsed “Masonic Trestle Board By V. Gerundo,” and a second endorsement by the Plaza Hotel. … Brown of Trestle Board), Morrill testified that it did not .even pictorially resemble the genuine signature of Mr.

New York Knickerbockers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

240 Cal. App. 4th 1229 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 2015

Co. v. Workers’ Comp. … In Seckels v.

Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. State Personnel Board

215 Cal. App. 4th 1101 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2013

ECU06619) Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Defendant; MOISES MOYA, Real Party in Interest and Appellant. … (Bonnell v. Medical Board of California (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1255, 1264-1265; Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization (1998) 19 Cal.4th 1, 12.)

Whitlow v. State Board of Medical Examiners

128 Cal. App. 2d 671 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1954

(People v. Whitlow, 113 Cal.App.2d 804 [ 249 P.2d 35 ].) Judge Bartlett heard the proceeding in mandamus, made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and rendered judgment. … The membership of the board had changed after the matter had been previously heard, and four members of the board on March 3, 1953, were not on the board in March, 1951.

Union Pacific Railroad v. State Board of Equalization

231 Cal. App. 3d 983 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1991

(Trailer Train Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1986) 180 Cal.App.3d 565, 582 [ 225 Cal.Rptr. 717 ]; Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. … Oil Co. v. Byram, supra, 25 Cal.2d at p. 362 ; Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. County of Butte, supra, 37 Cal.App.3d at pp. 477-478.)

Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. State Personnel Board

227 Cal. App. 4th 1250 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 2014

(Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. … (Ornelas v.

Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Air Resources Board

128 Cal. App. 3d 789 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1982

(City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation Com., supra, 76 Cal.App.3d at pp. 390-391; Board of Supervisors v. California Highway Commission (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 952, 958-961 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 504 ].) … (See California Optometric Assn. v. Lackner, supra, 60 Cal.App.3d at p. 508 .) Here, the Board’s resolution contains numerous recitals disclosing the underlying basis for the amendment to regulation 2.

Tracy v. Brown CA6

California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 2025

Filed 6/10/25 Tracy v. … H052301 Tracy v. Brown

Nicky Blair's Restaurant v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

109 Cal. App. 3d 941 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 1980

In the absence of ‘good cause,’ the appeals board is powerless to act. (Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Indus. A.C. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 314, 315-317 [ 57 P.2d 501 ].) … (Gay v. Workers’ Comp.

Hobart Estate Co. v. State Board of Equalization

1 Cal. App. 2d 328 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 1934

In the case of Hobart Estate Co. et al. v. Waters, 72 Cal. App. … of Equalization, to wit: That the counties and the State Board of Equalization should restrict their assessments and levies, first; by the counties to “Dual Use Property”, and, second; by the State Board of Equalization

Garcia v. Los Angeles County Board of Education

123 Cal. App. 3d 807 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1981

Board of Permit Appeals (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 525, 544-545, fn. 15 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 26 ]), whether the time provisions relate to matters of convenience or substance (Francis v. … In 1975 the United States Supreme Court in Goss v.

Franchise Tax Board v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

87 Cal. App. 3d 878 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1978

(See Feinberg v. One Doe Co. (1939) 14 Cal.2d 24, 27 [ 92 P.2d 640 ]; Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Davis (1964) 228 Cal.App.2d 827, 835-836 [ 39 Cal.Rptr. 791 ].) … (Lord v. Garland (1946) 27 Cal.2d 840, 848 [ 168 P.2d 5 ]; Colvig v. RKO *884 General, Inc. (1965) 232 Cal.App.2d 56, 70-71 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 473 ]; National Auto. Ins. Co. v.

County of Sonoma v. State Board of Equalization

195 Cal. App. 3d 982 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1987

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … (See e.g., Honey Springs Homeowners Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 1122, 1137 [ 203 Cal.Rptr. 886 ]; J. Paul Getty Museum v.

Chase Brass & Copper Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

10 Cal. App. 3d 496 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1970

(Butler Bros. v. McColgan, supra, at p. 678; Superior Oil Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, at p. 412.) … (Standard Register Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 259 Cal.App.2d 125, 129-130 [ 66 Cal.Rptr. 803 ]; Household Finance Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 230 Cal.App.2d 926, 930 [ 41 Cal.Rptr. 565 ]; Montgomery Ward & Co. v.

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

87 Cal. App. 3d 336 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1978

Record v. Indemnity Ins. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Castaic Lake v. Newhall Co. Water Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 2015

(Ibid., italics added.) 6 The Bagley-Keene Act is the state counterpart to the Brown Act, which applies to local agencies. (Southern California Edison Co. v. … Where, as here, the facts are undisputed, the question of whether the action taken complied with the Brown Act is one of law, to be reviewed de novo. (Furtado v.