Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
955 results
1.20s
California Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1998
(See Kuner v. Brea Redevelopment Agency (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 511 , 519 .) In Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1152 , 1171 , the court observed: ". . . … (See Thompson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 645-647 ; Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital Dist . (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 311 , 320-321 ; 73 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra , at 193-196.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 1998
In City of Stockton v. … In Stockton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 2004
Rules of Court, rule 1423(a); T.N.G. v. Superior Court, supra, 4 Cal.3d at pp. 780-781 ; Lorenza P. v. Superior Court (1988) 197 Cal.App.3d 607 , 610 ; Westcott v. … (See Westcott v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1998
As we explained in 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 60 , 62-63 (1985): "In American Canyon Fire Protection Dist . v. … County of Napa (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 100 , 104 , the court concluded that the members of a county board of supervisors could act as the governing board of a special district and distribute county funds to the district, stating
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 1998
For purposes of section 1090 , board members are conclusively presumed to be involved in the making of contracts under their jurisdiction. ( Thompson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 649 ; Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc . v. … (See Thomson v. Call, supra , 38 Cal.3d 633 ; Frazer-Yamor Agency, Inc . v. County of Del Norte, supra , 68 Cal.App.3d 201 ; People v. Valerga (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 847 ; People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Opinion 25-603
California Attorney General Reports · May 27, 2026
Code, § 5. 9 Prang v. … sets forth applicable procedures if it does so. 45 The statute is silent on whether the board may similarly delegate its gift-rejecting authority. 46 38 People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1997
(See Dawson v. East Side Union High School Dist ., supra , 28 Cal.App.4th at 1017 -1019 ; Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn . v. … In Choice-in-Education League v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 2022
Kerr v. … In Sloan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2003
(Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107 , 1113-1114 ; 86 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at p. 83; 79 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at pp. 25-26.) At any given time, a person has only one domicile. (DeMiglio v. … (See Chambers v. Hathaway (1921) 187 Cal. 104 , 105 ; In re Marriage of Thornton (1982) 135 Cal.App.3d 500 , 509 ; Fenton v. Board of Directors, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at p. 1117 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2004
(Hartzell v. Connell (1984) 35 Cal.3d 899 , 915 .) In San Rafael Elementary School Dist. v. … (Sonoma County Board of Education v. Public Employment Relations Board (1980) 102 Cal.App.3d 689 , 700 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1997
We are to interpret statutes by consulting "the words themselves, giving them their usual and ordinary meaning." ( DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc . (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593 , 601 .) … This administrative construction by the Board is entitled to great weight. (See People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294 , 309 ; Dix v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 442 , 460 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 2022
Smith v. … Holbrook v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jan 26, 2023
Chapman v. … Lacey v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 2019
Government Code abrogated for the board of supervisors serving as the county’s fire department board); McClain v. … (See, e.g., Flores v. Chevron U.S.A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 2000
In such case, the county board of supervisors will serve as the governing board. (§ 40100 .) … (California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Bd. of Rialto Unified School Dist. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 627 , 642 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 2022
I.L. 76-96 (May 11, 1976).) 10 See, e.g., People v. Col (1901) 132 Cal. 334, 335-338 (applying section 25, subdivision 19, of the County Government Act of 1897 to a vacancy for county auditor). 11 See Hedlund v. … Code, §§ 24200, 24202. 13 See, e.g., Ryder v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Opinion 24-401
California Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 2024
(See East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. v. … (a). 18 Folke v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1997
(See Dibb v. County of San Diego (1994) 8 Cal.4th 1200 , 1212 ; 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 362 , 364-365 (1995); 74 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 82 , 83 (1991).) In Schaefer v. … People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 2003
Acoustics Co. v. C.V. Holder, Inc. (1969) 71 Cal.2d 719 fn. 7; see MCM Construction, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 359 , 368-369 ; E.F. Brady Co. v. M.H. … [Citations.]" ( Rice v. Superior Court (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 81 , 86 ; see Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432 , 443 ; In re Richard E. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 349 , 353-354 ; Maryland Casualty Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Mar 13, 1998
Co . v. Deukmejian (1989) 48 Cal.3d 805 , 824-825 ; Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1 (1944) 26 Cal.2d 796 , 810 ; Rich Vision Centers, Inc . v. … Board of Medical Examiners (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 110 , 114 ; Stackler v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 240 , 245 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna