Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalag

955 results

1.20s

  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1998

    (See Kuner v. Brea Redevelopment Agency (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 511 , 519 .) In Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1152 , 1171 , the court observed: ". . . … (See Thompson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 645-647 ; Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital Dist . (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 311 , 320-321 ; 73 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra , at 193-196.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 1998

    In City of Stockton v. … In Stockton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2004)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 2004

    Rules of Court, rule 1423(a); T.N.G. v. Superior Court, supra, 4 Cal.3d at pp. 780-781 ; Lorenza P. v. Superior Court (1988) 197 Cal.App.3d 607 , 610 ; Westcott v. … (See Westcott v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1998

    As we explained in 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 60 , 62-63 (1985): "In American Canyon Fire Protection Dist . v. … County of Napa (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 100 , 104 , the court concluded that the members of a county board of supervisors could act as the governing board of a special district and distribute county funds to the district, stating

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 1998

    For purposes of section 1090 , board members are conclusively presumed to be involved in the making of contracts under their jurisdiction. ( Thompson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 649 ; Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc . v. … (See Thomson v. Call, supra , 38 Cal.3d 633 ; Frazer-Yamor Agency, Inc . v. County of Del Norte, supra , 68 Cal.App.3d 201 ; People v. Valerga (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 847 ; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • California Attorney General Opinion 25-603

    California Attorney General Reports · May 27, 2026

    Code, § 5. 9 Prang v. … sets forth applicable procedures if it does so. 45 The statute is silent on whether the board may similarly delegate its gift-rejecting authority. 46 38 People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    California Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1997

    (See Dawson v. East Side Union High School Dist ., supra , 28 Cal.App.4th at 1017 -1019 ; Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn . v. … In Choice-in-Education League v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 2022

    Kerr v. … In Sloan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    California Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2003

    (Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107 , 1113-1114 ; 86 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at p. 83; 79 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at pp. 25-26.) At any given time, a person has only one domicile. (DeMiglio v. … (See Chambers v. Hathaway (1921) 187 Cal. 104 , 105 ; In re Marriage of Thornton (1982) 135 Cal.App.3d 500 , 509 ; Fenton v. Board of Directors, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at p. 1117 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2004)

    California Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2004

    (Hartzell v. Connell (1984) 35 Cal.3d 899 , 915 .) In San Rafael Elementary School Dist. v. … (Sonoma County Board of Education v. Public Employment Relations Board (1980) 102 Cal.App.3d 689 , 700 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    California Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1997

    We are to interpret statutes by consulting "the words themselves, giving them their usual and ordinary meaning." ( DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc . (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593 , 601 .) … This administrative construction by the Board is entitled to great weight. (See People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294 , 309 ; Dix v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 442 , 460 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 2022

    Smith v. … Holbrook v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jan 26, 2023

    Chapman v. … Lacey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 2019

    Government Code abrogated for the board of supervisors serving as the county’s fire department board); McClain v. … (See, e.g., Flores v. Chevron U.S.A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 2000

    In such case, the county board of supervisors will serve as the governing board. (§ 40100 .) … (California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Bd. of Rialto Unified School Dist. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 627 , 642 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 2022

    I.L. 76-96 (May 11, 1976).) 10 See, e.g., People v. Col (1901) 132 Cal. 334, 335-338 (applying section 25, subdivision 19, of the County Government Act of 1897 to a vacancy for county auditor). 11 See Hedlund v. … Code, §§ 24200, 24202. 13 See, e.g., Ryder v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • California Attorney General Opinion 24-401

    California Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 2024

    (See East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. v. … (a). 18 Folke v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1997

    (See Dibb v. County of San Diego (1994) 8 Cal.4th 1200 , 1212 ; 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 362 , 364-365 (1995); 74 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 82 , 83 (1991).) In Schaefer v. … People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 2003

    Acoustics Co. v. C.V. Holder, Inc. (1969) 71 Cal.2d 719 fn. 7; see MCM Construction, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 359 , 368-369 ; E.F. Brady Co. v. M.H. … [Citations.]" ( Rice v. Superior Court (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 81 , 86 ; see Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432 , 443 ; In re Richard E. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 349 , 353-354 ; Maryland Casualty Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 13, 1998

    Co . v. Deukmejian (1989) 48 Cal.3d 805 , 824-825 ; Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1 (1944) 26 Cal.2d 796 , 810 ; Rich Vision Centers, Inc . v. … Board of Medical Examiners (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 110 , 114 ; Stackler v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 240 , 245 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.