Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

Court
California Attorney General Reports
Filed
Dec 1, 2022
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 21.8%

declining to construe “next general election” to refer to the election where the office is ordinarily filled because doing so “would render meaningless the [charter’s] words ‘for the unexpired term’”

How later courts described this case

  • declining to construe “next general election” to refer to the election where the office is ordinarily filled because doing so “would render meaningless the [charter’s] words ‘for the unexpired term’”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

State of California

ROB BONTA

Attorney General

__________

:

OPINION : No. 22-804

:

of : December 1, 2022

:

ROB BONTA :

Attorney General :

:

KARIM J. KENTFIELD :

Deputy Attorney General :

The HONORABLE TIFFANY N. NORTH, COUNTY COUNSEL, COUNTY OF

VENTURA, has requested an opinion on a question relating to filling a vacancy on the

county Board of Supervisors.

QUESTION PRESENTED AND CONCLUSION

When a vacancy arises on the board of supervisors in a general law county,

Government Code section 25061 authorizes an election to fill the seat for the remainder

of the term at the next “general election,” subject to certain timing considerations. Are

the general election dates for statewide elections in Elections Code section 324(a)(2)

considered “general election” dates for purposes of filling a board of supervisor’s

vacancy under Government Code section 25061?

Yes, the general election dates in Elections Code section 324(a)(2) are considered

“general election” dates for purposes of filling a vacancy on the board of supervisors

under Government Code section 25061. For a date to qualify as a general election date

under section 324(a)(2), it must be a regular election date specified in Elections Code

section 1000, and a statewide election must be held on that date.

1

22-804

BACKGROUND

This opinion request arises from a vacancy on the Ventura County Board of

Supervisors. Ventura County is a general law county divided into five supervisorial

districts. 1 Each supervisor is elected to office for a four-year term, with staggered

elections alternating every two years between the odd- and even-numbered districts. 2

As relevant here, Carmen Ramirez was elected to serve as the District 5

Supervisor for Ventura County on November 3, 2020. Her four-year term of office began

on January 5, 2021, and will end on January 6, 2025. On August 12, 2022, Supervisor

Ramirez passed away, creating a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors. 3

In a general law county like Ventura, the Government Code dictates how such a

vacancy is filled. Under Government Code section 25060, “the Governor shall fill the

vacancy,” with the appointee to “hold office until the election and qualification of [a]

successor.” In September 2022, the Governor appointed Vianey Lopez to fill the vacancy

until a successor is elected and qualified.

As to the timing of a successor’s election, Government Code section 25061

authorizes an election to fill a supervisor vacancy for the remainder of the term at the

“next general election,” unless that election would occur in the term’s fourth and final

year. This opinion request asks how to identify the “next general election” under section

25061 in the context of the District 5 vacancy on the Ventura County Board of

Supervisors. 4

1

The California Constitution recognizes two types of counties: general law counties and

charter counties. In a general law county, state statutes “regulate the [county’s] powers

and governmental structure.” (Dibb v. Cnty. of San Diego (1994) 8 Cal.4th 1200, 1206.)

Charter counties, in contrast, can exercise local control over certain “matters concerning

the structure and operation of local government.” (Id. at p. 1207.)

2

Gov. Code, §§ 24203, 25000, subd. (a).

3

Gov. Code, § 1770, subd. (a).

4

In addressing this request, we assume that section 25061 may authorize an election here

notwithstanding the Governor’s appointment of Vianey Lopez to the District 5 seat. As

our prior opinions have stated, a gubernatorial appointment under section 25060 lasts

only until the “election and qualification of [a] successor,” including an election provided

for under section 25061. (See 104 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 80, 81 (2021);

64 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 1 (1981).)

2

22-804

ANALYSIS

We begin by construing the phrase “next general election” in Government Code

section 25061, which provides in full: “The election of a supervisor to fill the vacancy

for the unexpired term shall be held at the next general election, unless the term expires

on the first Monday after January 1st succeeding the election.” 5 Our construction of that

language is informed by the California Supreme Court’s decision in Hedlund v. Davis. 6

There, the Court considered a county charter providing that, in case of a vacancy for

certain county offices, county voters must elect an officer to fill the vacancy “for the

unexpired term” at the “next general election.” 7 Consistent with the ordinary meaning of

“next,” the Court construed “next general election” to refer to “the very first general

election which occurs following the vacancy, for which election candidates could qualify

under any method prescribed by law.” 8 We believe the same construction of “next

general election” should apply to section 25061, whose language is substantially similar

to the charter in Hedlund. In other words, we construe “next general election” in section

25061 to refer to the first “general election” following the vacancy at which there is still

time for candidates to qualify for the ballot. 9

We note that “next general election” in section 25061 does not mean the next

regularly scheduled election for the vacated seat. In other statutes, the phrase “next

general election” has been construed in that manner to refer to the election at which the

office is normally filled for the full four-year term. 10 But that reading would make little

sense in the context of section 25061, which provides that the candidate selected at the

“next general election” shall serve for the remainder of “the unexpired term.” 11 Indeed,

construing “next general election” in section 25061 to refer to the election at which a

supervisor is ordinarily elected would render the entire provision a nullity: Supervisors

5

Gov. Code, § 25061 (emphasis added).

6

Hedlund v. Davis (1956) 47 Cal.2d 75.

7

Id. at p. 79 (emphasis added).

8

Id. at p. 80.

9

This interpretation is consistent with our past opinions. (See 64 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.,

supra, at pp. 1, 3-5; 28 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 17, 18 (1956); unpublished opn. I.L. 76-96

(May 11, 1976).)

10

See, e.g., People v. Col (1901) 132 Cal. 334, 335-338 (applying section 25, subdivision

19, of the County Government Act of 1897 to a vacancy for county auditor).

11

See Hedlund v. Davis, supra, 47 Cal.2d at p. 80 (declining to construe “next general

election” to refer to the election where the office is ordinarily filled because doing so

“would render meaningless the [charter’s] words ‘for the unexpired term’”).

3

22-804

are ordinarily elected in the fourth and final year of the term. 12 But section 25061

expressly bars holding a vacancy election in the term’s final year. We therefore construe

“next general election” in section 25061 to refer to the first general election following the

vacancy where there is sufficient time for candidates to qualify for the ballot.

We turn, then, to identifying when that election might be in the circumstances

here. Although the Government Code does not define “general election,” the Elections

Code does. 13 As relevant here, the opinion requestor asks how to apply Elections Code

section 324(a)(2), which defines “general election” as “[a]ny statewide election held on a

regular election date as specified in Section 1000.” 14

As a threshold consideration, the requestor observes that section 324(a)(2) defines

“general election” in the context of a statewide election, whereas supervisor elections are

limited to an individual county. 15 But California often schedules local elections along

with statewide races, to reduce election costs and improve voter participation on votes

concerning local issues. 16 Government Code section 24200, for instance, requires

electing numerous county officers at the “general election at which the Governor is

elected.” Because there is nothing unusual about consolidating a county election with a

statewide election, we construe the term “general election” in section 25061 in

accordance with the definition provided by the Elections Code—including the dates

specified in section 324(a)(2).

We thus consider the possible “general election” dates following the vacancy at

issue here, for District 5 of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors. As noted, section

12

See Gov. Code, §§ 24200, 24202.

13

See, e.g., Ryder v. City of Los Altos (1954) 125 Cal.App.2d 209, 210-11 (construing the

Government Code to incorporate relevant provisions of the Elections Code);

104 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at p. 82 (same).

14

Elections Code section 324(a)(1) defines “general election” to also include the

“election held throughout the state on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of

November in each even-numbered year.” We need not separately analyze this provision

here, as the same dates are defined as a “general election” under section 324(a)(2) and

Elections Code section 1000(e).

15

County Counsel Analysis Regarding Next General Election Date For Purposes Of

Filling A Board Of Supervisors Vacancy, at p. 4 (Aug. 31, 2022) (“County Counsel

Analysis”).

16

See, e.g., 100 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 4 (2017) (discussing the California Voter

Participation Rights Act, which requires holding certain local elections on a statewide

election date to ensure adequate voter turnout).

4

22-804

324(a)(2) defines “general election” as any “statewide election held on” one of the five

regular election dates “specified in section 1000.” The section 1000 dates, in turn, are:

(a) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of each even-numbered year

that is evenly divisible by four.

(b) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of each odd-numbered year.

(c) The second Tuesday of April in each even-numbered year.

(d) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in June in each even-numbered year

that is not evenly divisible by four.

(e) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year. 17

Under section 1000, then, the election dates following the District 5 vacancy are:

(a) March 5, 2024; (b) March 7, 2023; (c) April 9, 2024; (d) June 2, 2026; (e) November

8, 2022, November 7, 2023, and November 5, 2024.

Considering these dates in chronological order, the earliest date—November 8,

2022—is a “general election” date under section 324(a)(2) because a statewide election

was held on that date. 18 According to the requestor, however, that election occurred too

soon after the District 5 vacancy for candidates to qualify for the ballot. 19 Therefore, as

discussed above, that date does not count as the “next general election” for purposes of

filling the vacancy under Government Code section 25061.

The next possible section 1000 election date is March 7, 2023, followed by

November 7, 2023. But no statewide election is scheduled on either date. 20 So long as

17

A range of statutes require scheduling elections on one of these dates. (See, e.g., Elec.

Code, § 1301, subd. (a) [general municipal election]; Gov. Code, § 1780, subd. (e)(2)

[special district governing board election]; Educ. Code, § 5018, subd. (a) [elementary

school district governing board election].)

18

See Elec. Code, §§ 1200, 1001, subd. (a). This election was also a “general election”

under section 324(a)(1), as it was “held throughout the state on the first Tuesday after the

first Monday of November in [an] even-numbered year.”

19

See County Counsel Analysis, at pp. 2-3.

20

See California Secretary of State, Upcoming Elections,

https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections (as of Nov. 30, 2022).

5

22-804

that remains the case, they cannot be “general election[s]” under section 324(a)(2), which

expressly requires that a “statewide election” be “held” on the date in question. 21

The final possible section 1000 dates are March 5, 2024, April 9, 2024, November

5, 2024, and June 2, 2026. But the first three of those dates fall in the final year of the

term—2024—and Government Code section 25061 makes clear that an election to fill a

supervisor vacancy for the remainder of the term may not be held during that year.

Section 25061 directs that the “election of a supervisor to fill the vacancy for the

unexpired term shall be held at the next general election, unless the term expires on the

first Monday after January 1st succeeding the election”—that is, unless the next general

election is in the final year of the four-year term. 22 As to the final date—June 2, 2026—it

is plainly too late to hold an election for the remainder of a term that expires in January

2025.

In sum, there is no “general election” date on which an election could be held to

fill the District 5 supervisor seat for the remainder of Supervisor Ramirez’s term. The

statewide “general election” dates specified in Elections Code section 324(a) are either

too early or too late for section 25061 to authorize a vacancy election. The next election

for the District 5 seat should therefore be held in 2024, in the ordinary course, for the new

four-year term beginning in January 2025.

21

It is beyond the scope of this opinion to analyze the separate question of whether, if a

statewide special election were scheduled on one of these dates, it would necessarily be

deemed a “general election.” Although the requirements of section 324(a)(2) would

appear to be satisfied, section 324(b)(1) could be read to suggest that, for a date to qualify

as a general election, there must be an election for a Congressional Representative on that

date. We are not asked to construe section 324(b)(1) here, and we express no opinion on

how to harmonize section 324(a)(2) and section 324(b)(1).

22

In addition, April 9, 2024, is not a “general election” under section 324(a)(2) because

there is no “statewide election” scheduled to be “held” on that date. (Elec. Code, § 324,

subd. (a)(2); see California Secretary of State, Upcoming Elections,

https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections (as of Nov. 30, 2022).)

6

22-804

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.