Case law

Security-First National Bank v. Pierson

2 Cal. 2d 63 · California Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1934

(McCue v. Tunstead, 65 Cal. 506, 507 [ 4 Pac. 510 ]; Estate of Slade, 122 Cal. 434, 437 [ 55 Pac. 158 ] ; Simons v. Lovell, 7 Heisk. (54 Tenn. *65 419) 510, 516; Dillard v. Webb, 55 Ala. 468, 474 ; 25 Cor. … (Pacific Bank v. Robinson, 57 Cal. 520, 522 [ 40 Am. Rep. 120 ] ; Stanton v. French, 91 Cal. 274 [ 27 Pac. 657 , 25 Am. St. Rep. 174 ] ; Estate of Brown, 123 Cal. 399, 401 [ 55 Pac. 1055 , 69 Am. St.

People v. Superior Court

3 Cal. 3d 807 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1970

(People v. Brown (1955) 45 Cal.2d 640, 643 [ 290 P.2d 528 ], and cases cited.) “What is the test of reason which makes a search reasonable? … Wigginton (1967) 254 Cal.App.2d 321 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 104 ]; People v. Brown (1969) 272 Cal.App.2d 448 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 438 ]; Bergeron v. Superior Court (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 433 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 711 ]; People v.

Stockton Automobile Co. v. Confer

154 Cal. 402 · California Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1908

The defendant Confer was a member of the board of public works which awarded the contract, knew of the contract, and was at the same time superintendent of streets. … Thus in Williams v.

People v. Clark

47 Cal. 456 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

By the Court: The judgment' must be reversed, upon the authority of Richardson v. Heydenfeldt, 46 Cal. 68 . The case here is not distinguishable from that case. … The notice of intention upon the part of the Board is not set forth in the complaint, but the plaintiff cannot claim a judgment in his favor except upon the presumption that such a notice, containing a proper designation

Marsh v. State Bar

2 Cal. 2d 75 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1934

(Marsh v. State Bar, supra, p. 306 .) … (Barbee v. State Bar, 213 Cal. 296 [ 2 Pac. (2d) 353 ] ; Dahl v. State Bar, 213 Cal. 160 [ 1 Pac. (2d) 977 ]; Mills v.

Western Lithograph Co. v. Vanomar Producers

185 Cal. 366 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1921

It is necessary only to refer to Crowley v. Genesee Min. Co., 55 Cal. 273 , and Aigeltinger v. … (Michaud v. MacGregor, 61 Minn. 198 , [ 63 N. W. 479 ]; King v. Duluth etc. Co., 61 Minn. 482 , [ 63 N. W. 1105 ].)

Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.

173 Cal. 674 · California Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1916

The injunction restrained the enforcement of an assessment levied by the board of directors of the Imperial Irrigation District. … (Foster v. Smith, 115 Cal. 611 , [ 47 Pac. 591 ]; Bradley v. Voorsanger, 143 Cal. 214 , [ 76 Pac. 1031 ].) The appeal is dismissed. Shaw, J., and Lawlor, J., concurred.

Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

160 Cal. 632 · California Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1911

Jur., 13th ed., sec. 300; Pinckston v. Brown, 3 Jones Eq. [56 N. C.] 494; Kitchen v. Greenebaum, 61 Mo. 115 .)” … To quote from a few of these cases:— In Brown v. First National Bank, 137 Ind. 655 , [ 37 N. E. 158 , 24 L. R.

O'Hara v. O'Brien

107 Cal. 309 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1895

Polack, 70 Cal. 487 ; Gordon v. Booker, 97 Cal. 586 ; Blackburn v. … (Gordon v. Booker, supra; Wise v. Burton, 73 Cal. 166 .)

People v. Fleming

94 Cal. 308 · California Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1892

(People v. Mayes, 66 Cal. 597 ; 56 Am. Rep. 126 .) … This principle was also approved in the late case of People v. Manchego, 80 Cal. 306 . Upon an examination of the record in the case of People v.

Doble Steam Motors Corp. v. Daugherty

195 Cal. 158 · California Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1924

In the case of Suckow v. … Co. v.

Knight v. City of Los Angeles

26 Cal. 2d 764 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1945

Board of Education, 42 Cal.App.2d 415 [ 109 P.2d 29 ]; Sand *767 stoe v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 28 Cal.App.2d 215 [ 82 P.2d 216 ] ; Uttley v. City of Santa Ana, 136 Cal.App. 23 [ 28 P.2d 377 ]; Milovich v. … Defendant relies upon Kelso v. Board of Education, 42 Cal.App.2d 415 [ 109 P.2d 29 ], and Shipman v.

Roy E. Hanson Jr. Mfg. v. County of Los Angeles

27 Cal. 3d 870 · California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1980

For the reasons stated in Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan (1980) ante, page 855 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 820 , 616 P.2d 802 ], we conclude that article XIII A does not apply to the 1978-1979 unsecured roll. … The general principles of the California property taxation system are discussed in Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan, supra, ante, page 855.

Richardson v. State Bar

19 Cal. 2d 707 · California Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1942

. — This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar that petitioner be disbarred from the practice of the law. … The board thereafter adopted the committee’s findings and has recommended that petitioner be disbarred.

California Building Industry Ass'n v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District

62 Cal. 4th 369 · California Supreme Court · Dec 17, 2015

(Communities for a Better Environment v. … Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 566 [noting that certain ―statutory and judicial concepts are carried forward in the Guidelines‖]; East Peninsula Ed. Council, Inc. v.

Webb v. Carlon

148 Cal. 555 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1906

has been in contested and ex parte cases to find the date of settlement from the evidence in the case, and that date so found must control the adjudication of their right without regard to the alleged date. ” In Zinkand v. … Brown, 3 Land Dec. Dep. Int. 380, the secretary of the interior lays down the same rule. In Campbell v. Rankin, 99 U.

People v. Livaditis

2 Cal. 4th 759 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

(See People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 540-545 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], revd. on other grounds sub nom. California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538 [ 93 L.Ed.2d 934 , 107 S.Ct. 837 .) … Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at page 545 , footnote 19, are constitutional. (People v. Nicolaus, supra, 54 Cal.3d at pp. 590-591, and cases cited therein; People v.

People v. Sheldon

7 Cal. 4th 1136 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1994

This procedure constituted error (see People v. Brown (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322, 337 [ 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 862 P.2d 710 ] [in ruling on modification motion, court considers only evidence submitted to jury]; People v. … (See People v. Rodriguez, supra, 42 Cal.3d 730, 794-795 .)” (Sheldon I, supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 963 ; see also People v. Brown, supra, 6 Cal.4th at p. 339, fn. 16 .) The judgment of death is affirmed.

People v. Ammerman

118 Cal. 23 · California Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1897

(People v. Varnum, 53 Cal. 630 ; People v. Helbing, 61 Cal. 620 ; People v. … Brown’s. It was in an old sock. When I was going up I stepped on it, and I heard something, and I picked it up. I guess the old sock is down there at Brown’s yet.”

People v. Bolanger

71 Cal. 17 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1886

It is contended the court below erred in sustaining an objection to the question asked by defendant of the witness Brown. … The charge is sustained by People v. Farrell, 30 Cal. 316 .