Opinion

Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.

  • 173 Cal. 674
  • 161 P. 119
  • 1916 Cal. LEXIS 462
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 17, 1916
Status
Published
Author
Sloss
On the bench
Sloss
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 70.9%

The opinion

SLOSS, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from an order granting an injunction

pendente Ute.

The injunction restrained the enforcement of an assessment levied by the board of directors of the Imperial Irrigation District. The trial of the action resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendants, and we have this day filed an opinion affirming such judgment.

(Imperial Land Co.

v.

Imperial Irr. Dist., ante,

p. 668, [ 161 Pac. 116 ].)

The judgment on the merits, which now becomes final, ended the life of the temporary injunction. The defendants have, accordingly, secured every substantial benefit which they could obtain by a reversal of the order which they seek to review by the present appeal. The rights of the parties would not be affected in any way by either an affirmance or a reversal of such order. In this state of facts, the questions presented are merely moot or academic, and the court will not exercise its appellate jurisdiction for their decision.

(Foster

v.

Smith,

115 Cal. 611 , [ 47 Pac. 591 ];

Bradley

v.

Voorsanger,

143 Cal. 214 , [ 76 Pac. 1031 ].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Shaw, J., and Lawlor, J., concurred.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.