Case law

County of Butte v. Merrill

141 Cal. 396 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1903

It further correctly held that the board of supervisors had not the power either to create the office of license-tax collector or to fix his compensation. (County of El Dorado v. Meiss, 100 Cal. 273 .) … It was decided in Dougherty v. Austin, 94 Cal. 601 , that a board of supervisors has nothing to do with fixing the compensation of a county officer.

Donald L. v. Superior Court

7 Cal. 3d 592 · California Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1972

(Kent v. United States, supra.) … Therefore, we disapprove statements in People v. Brown (1970) 13 Cal.App.3d 876, 881 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 904 ], and People v.

Harman v. City and County of San Francisco

7 Cal. 3d 150 · California Supreme Court · May 15, 1972

(Neff v. Ernst (1957) 48 Cal.2d 628, 636 [ 311 P.2d 849 ]; Bacich v. Board of Control (1943) 23 Cal.2d 343, 349-350 [ 144 P.2d 818 ]; Ratchford v. County of Sonoma (1972) 22 Cal.App.3d 1056, 1069 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 887 ].) … City of Manhattan Beach (1966) 65 Cal.2d 13, 24 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 881 , 415 P.2d 769 ]; Wehrle v. Board of W. & P. Commrs. (1930) 211 Cal. 70, 72-73 [ 293 P. 67 ]; but cf. Silver v.

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons

101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 470 · California Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2000

(E.g., Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown (1957) 354 U.S. 436, 441 [ 77 S.Ct. 1325, 1327-1328 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 ]; Near v. Minnesota, supra, 283 U.S. at p. 716 [ 51 S.Ct. at p. 631 ].) … Kennard, J., Werdegar, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Lenahan v. Poole

38 Cal. 2d 392 · California Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1952

from the roller, and that large pieces and strips were still attached to the board. … (See Mondine v. Sarlin, 11 Cal.2d 593, 597 [ 81 P.2d 903 ] [injury to business visitor] ; Potter v. Empress Theatre Co., 91 Cal.App.2d 4, 12 [ 204 P.2d 120 ] [injury to passerby on sidewalk]; Rest., Torts, §§ 364, 365.)

Grupe Development Co. v. Superior Court

4 Cal. 4th 911 · California Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1993

(Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing Board (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 218, 225-226 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 818 ].) … (Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing Board, supra, 1 Cal.App.4th 218, 226 .)

Intel Corporation v. Hamidi

118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 546 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2002

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 546 (2002) 43 P.3d 587 INTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kourosh Kenneth HAMIDI, Defendant and Appellant. No. S103781. Supreme Court of California. March 27, 2002. … GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, J., WERDEGAR, J., BROWN, J., and MORENO, J., concur.

City of Yuba City v. Consolidated Mausoleum Syndicate

207 Cal. 587 · California Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1929

Brown conveyed said property to E. B. Snook by the same description; on June 2, 1917, the estate of said E. B. Snook conveyed said property to defendant in this action, also by the same description. … (San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. County of Contra Costa, ante, p. 1 [ 276 Pac. 570 ].) Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Seawell, J., Waste, C. J., and Richards, J., concurred.

Lilly-Brackett Co. v. Sonnemann

157 Cal. 192 · California Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1910

The earlier cases of Shock v. McChesney, 4 Yeates, (Pa.) 507, [ 2 Am. Dec. 415 ], and Bank v. Israel, 6 Serg. R. (Pa.) 294, cited in Ekel v. … v.

California Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. Industrial Welfare Commission

25 Cal. 3d 200 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1979

act as chairman of the wage board on request of the commission. … the Industrial Safety Board overlap.

Thom v. County of Los Angeles

136 Cal. 375 · California Supreme Court · May 20, 1902

In Longan v. … In Kiernan v.

BIG CREEK LUMBER v. Santa Cruz County

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 210 · California Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2004

14 Cal.Rptr.3d 210 (2004) 91 P.3d 162 BIG CREEK LUMBER v. SANTA CRUZ COUNTY. No. S123659. Supreme Court of California. June 9, 2004. Petition for review granted. … GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ.

Mayo v. State Bar

23 Cal. 3d 72 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1978

We review, and approve, the recommendation of the majority of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (board) that petitioner Mike Mayo should be suspended from the practice of law for four months. … (See Brotsky v. State Bar (1962) 57 Cal.2d 287, 301 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 153 , 368 P.2d 697 , 94 A.L.R.2d 1310 ].)

Tully v. Bauer

52 Cal. 487 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

in support of the point that the publication was sufficient, cited Haskell v. Bartlett, 34 Cal. 284 ; Chandler v. Spear, 22 Vt. 388 ; Brown v. Hutchinson, 11 Vt. 569 ; Clark v. Mowyer, 5 Mich. 465 ; People v. … Seymour, 16 Cal. 332 ; Perry v. Washburn, 12 Cal. 270 .) H H. Haight, for the Respondents.

Barton v. State Bar of Cal.

209 Cal. 677 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1930

And in State Bar v. … Attorney-General v. MacCabe, 18 Colo. 186 [ 36 Am. St. Rep. 270 , 19 L. R.

Garrett v. Superior Court

11 Cal. 3d 245 · California Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1974

Dist. v. Jos. W. … Dist. v.

Hunter v. Justice's Court

36 Cal. 2d 315 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1950

City of Oxford, supra; Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 126 Tex. 296 [ 83 S.W.2d 935 , 99 A.L.R. 1107 ] ; Berline v. … (Ex parte Whitley, 144 Cal. 167, 171 [ 77 P. 879 , 1 Ann.Cas. 13]; Bohannon v. Board of Medical Examiners, 24 Cal.App. 215 [ 140 P. 1089 ]; People v. Walsh, 346 Ill. 52 [ 178 N.E. 343 ]; Gerard v. Smith (Tex.

N. P. R. R. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.

174 Cal. 297 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1917

C. 539; Fletcher v. The Duchess [1911], App. Cas. 671, 81 L. J. K. B., N. S., 33; 55 Sol. J. 598, 4 B. W. C. C. 317, 105 L. T., N. S., 121; Losh v. Evans, 51 Week. Rep. 243, 18 Times L. R. 142; Hendry v. Caledonian Ry. … Such is the case of Wemyss Coal Co. v. Symon, 49 Scott. L. R. 921, 6 B. W. C.

People v. Gonzalez

51 Cal. 3d 1179 · California Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1990

Especially problematic is their discussion of Brown error. ( People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal. Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], revd. on other grounds sub nom. California v. … (See also People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 541 [ 220 Cal. Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ].)

City of Hope Medical Center v. Genentech Inc.

24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 178 · California Supreme Court · Feb 2, 2005

24 Cal.Rptr.3d 178 (2005) 105 P.3d 543 CITY OF HOPE MEDICAL CENTER v. GENENTECH INC. No. S129463. Supreme Court of California. February 2, 2005. … GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, CHIN and BROWN, JJ., concur.