Case law

White v. Davis

133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 648 · California Supreme Court · May 1, 2003

Brown, supra, 30 Cal.App.4th 1264, 1283 ). (White v. Davis I, supra, 108 Cal.App.4th 197, 212-216 .) … (Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d [432,] 447 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 777 P.2d 610 ].)” (White v.

Bluestein v. State Bar

13 Cal. 3d 162 · California Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1974

The assertion does not sustain petitioner’s burden of showing that the board’s action is erroneous or unlawful. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6083, subd. (c); cf. Black v. … (See Abeles v.

People v. Gallego

52 Cal. 3d 115 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1990

(People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 446-448 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P2d 1135 ].) 6. … (See Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d 432, 460.) 19.

Gray v. Lawlor

151 Cal. 352 · California Supreme Court · May 23, 1907

W. 693 ] ; Albright v. Warkington, 31 Kan. 442 , [ 2 Pac. 614 ] ; Kinney v. O’Bannon, 6 Bush, 692 ; McLean v. McLean, 84 N. C. 366 ; Sattelee v. Grubb, 38 Kan. 234 , [ 16 Pac. 475 ] ; Brown v. … Brown, 86 Tenn. 277 , [ 6 S. W. 869 , 7 S. W. 640 ] ; Snow v. Hawpe, 22 Tex. 168 ; Lyons v. Robbins, 46 Ill. 276 .

Western Metal Supply Co. v. Pillsbury

172 Cal. 407 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1916

As was said in State v. … rather than judicial powers. ( Borgnis v.

California Highway Commission v. Riley

192 Cal. 97 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1923

Y. 109 ; People v. Stephens, 71 N. Y. 549 , and Chapman v. … (People v. Murphy, 20 Cal. App. 398 [ 129 Pac. 603 ]; Devlin v. Donnelly, 20 Cal. App. 495 [ 129 Pac. 607 ].)

Wells v. State Bar

15 Cal. 3d 367 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1975

(Yokozeki v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 436, 443-444 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 602 , 521 P.2d 858 ]; Taylor v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 424, 429 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 478 , 521 P.2d 470 ].) … (Bernstein v. State Bar (1972) 6 Cal.3d 909, 919 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 495 P.2d 1289 ].)

National Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.

11 Cal. 2d 283 · California Supreme Court · May 2, 1938

App. (2d) 482 [ 39 Pac. (2d) 829 ]; Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Los Angeles, 6 Cal. App. (2d) 200 [ 44 Pac. (2d) 451 ]; Graham Bros., Inc., v. Los Angeles, 6 Cal. App. (2d) 203 [ 44 Pac. (2d) 452 ]; Roth Drug, Inc., v. … The case of Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization, ante, p. 156 [ 78 Pac. (2d) 731 ], reinforced by each of the companion cases of identical title, numbered respectively, S. F. 15915 and S.

People v. Floyd

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 885 · California Supreme Court · Jul 21, 2003

(See, e.g., People v. … (People v. Rhoads *195 (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 56, 60 [ 270 Cal.Rptr. 266 ]; see Boyll v. State Personnel Board (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 1070, 1073-1074 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].)

Stratmore v. State Bar

14 Cal. 3d 887 · California Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1975

'Following evidentiary hearings both the local committee and Board of Governors of the State Bar (hereafter called the board) determined that the evidence sustained the foregoing charge. … As noted in Alkow v.

Martin v. Szeto

9 Cal. Rptr. 3d 687 · California Supreme Court · Feb 19, 2004

WE CONCUR: GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ. … (Brent Barnhart and Beth Meador, ACLU Legislative Advocates, letter to Governor Edmund Brown, Sept. 23, 1981, pp. 1-2.) [7] Contradicting the legislative history, dictum in Planned Protective Services v.

In Re Gehring

22 Cal. 2d 708 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1943

We may appropriately repeat here what we said in Spears v. … (See Kepler v. State Bar, 216 Cal. 52, 55 [ 13 P.2d 509 ].) From what has been said it appears that the recommendation of the Board of Governors against the readmission of petitioner is supported by the evidence.

City & County San Francisco v. Certain Real Estate

42 Cal. 513 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1872

(Stoddard v. Treadwell, 29 Cal. 282 ; Sleeper v. Kelly, 22 Cal. 456 ; Coryell v. Cain, 16 Cal. 572 ; Brotherton v. Hart, 11 Cal. 405 ; Imley v. Beard, 6 Cal. 666 .) … This was done, and it is too late now to inquire whether the Board strictly pursued its original authority in its mode of initiating the work.

Lambert v. Haskell

80 Cal. 611 · California Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1889

Brooks, 38 Cal. 603 ; Joseph v. Holt, 37 Cal. 253 ; Hallock v. Jaudin, 34 Cal. 175 ; Wills v. Kempt, 17 Cal. 98 .) In Joseph v. … (Terre Haute v. Hudnut, 120 Ind. 550 et seq.; Allison v. Chandler, 11 Mich. 558 et seq.; Chapman v. Kirby, 49 Ill. 219 ; Simmons v. Brown, 5 R. I. 299; 73 Am. Dec. 66 ; Gibson v. Fisher, 68 Iowa, 30 ; Goebel v.

Thompson v. City of San Diego

43 Cal. 3d 1033 · California Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1987

(See, e.g., Dickey v. Retirement Board (1976) 16 Cal.3d 745, 748-749 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 289 , 548 P.2d 689 ]; Shelly v. State Personnel Bd. (1975) 15 Cal. 3d 194, 206-207 [ 124 Cal.Rptr. 14 , 539 P.2d 774 ].) … In view of the fiduciary relationship between the retirement board and plaintiff (see, e.g., Hittle v.

People v. Avena

13 Cal. 4th 394 · California Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1996

(People v. Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d at pp. 446-449; see People v. Wright, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 438 [applying the Brown “reasonable possibility” standard].) … Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ] (hereafter Brown) revd. on another issue, California v. Brown, supra, 479 U.S. 538 ; CALJIC No. 8.84.1 (4th ed. 1979); § 190.3.)

People v. Young

108 Cal. 8 · California Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1895

In State v. Greenman, 23 Minn. 209 , there appeared to be a doubt as to the identity of the list. 4. … (People v.

People v. Baldwin

117 Cal. 244 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1897

The ordinance was produced from the regular record book of the board, with the usual recitals as to its adoption, and it appeared that the board had ever since its adoption acted in pursuance of its provisions; there was … (Merced Co. v. Fleming, 111 Cal. 46.) The further ground of the challenge that the order of court designating the number of jurors to be selected by the board was not signed by the judge is without merit.

Hampton v. County of San Diego

62 Cal. 4th 340 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 2015

(Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. Garcia (2013) 58 Cal.4th 175, 186; City of Huntington Beach v. Board of Administration (1992) 4 Cal.4th 462, 468.) … Name of Opinion Hampton v.

Lagomarsino v. Giannini

146 Cal. 545 · California Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1905

(Chaffee v. Browne, 109 Cal. 211 .) … Soc. v. Dowd, 137 Cal. 408 , and Whelan v.