Case law

People v. Hunter

49 Cal. 3d 957 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1989

(People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 454 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].) 4. … (Id., at p. 776; accord People v. Adcox (1988) 47 Cal.3d 207, 270 [ 253 Cal.Rptr. 55 , 763 P.2d 906 ]; People v. Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d at pp. 457-458; People v.

Ruelas v. County of Alameda

California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 2024

(See Pitts v. … (Santos v. Brown (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 398, 410.) We conclude that article XIV, section 5 of the California Constitution and Penal Code section 4019.3 can be harmonized. (See Penziner v.

People v. Camodeca

52 Cal. 2d 142 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1959

(People v. Brown, 49 Cal. 2d 577, 591 [ 320 P.2d 5 ].) … Defendant first tried to get $720 from Murphy by falsely representing to him that certain charges on file against his business could be “fixed” with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and he met with Murphy to collect the

People v. Martinez

20 Cal. 4th 225 · California Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1999

*229 Opinion BROWN, J. … Brown (1974) 11 Cal.3d 784 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 426 , 523 P.2d 226 ]] (a movement of approximately 75 feet), [People v.

People v. Spriggs

60 Cal. 2d 868 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1964

Bava, 204 Cal. 136, 139 [ 266 P. 954 ] [excluding evidence of defendant’s liability insurance] ; see Brown v. Pacific Elec. Ry. … Bus Co., 47 Cal.App. 568, 570 [ 190 P. 1036 ]), and of bodily condition (People v. Brown, 49 Cal.2d 577, 585-587 [ 320 P.2d 5 ]; People v. Wright, 167 Cal. 1, 8 [ 138 P. 349 ]; see People v.

American Coatings Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District

54 Cal. 4th 446 · California Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2012

(Golden Drugs, supra, 179 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1466; see also Shappell Industries, Inc. v. Governing Board (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 218, 232.) … V.

People ex rel. Smith v. Myers

15 Cal. 33 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1860

This was a bill filed in the District Court for the purpose of declaring void a contract made by the Board of Supervisors of Stanislaus county, for a court house, jail, etc. A demurrer was interposed by the defendants.

Kuchel v. Tolhurst

39 Cal. 2d 224 · California Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1952

(See Wattson v. Dillon (1936), 6 Cal.2d 33, 40 [ 56 P.2d 220 ]; Neblett v. Pacific Mutual L. Ins. Co. (1943), 22 Cal.2d 393, 397-398 [ 139 P.2d 934 ] ; Gale v. … (See Bermite Powder Co. v. Franchise Tax Board (1952), 38 Cal.2d 700, 703 [ 242 P.2d 9 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Schifando v. City of Los Angeles

6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 457 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2003

Board of Civil Service Commrs. (1945) 26 Cal.2d 716, 721 , 160 P.2d 816 ; Moreno v. Cairns, supra, 20 Cal.2d 531 , 127 P.2d 914 ) and our intermediate appellate courts (e.g., Temple v. … I CONCUR: BROWN, J.

Rojo v. Kliger

52 Cal. 3d 65 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1990

Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477 [ 208 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 691 P.2d 272 ] is illustrative. … Cohen v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 40 Cal.3d 277, 290-291 [ 219 Cal.Rptr. 467 , 707 P.2d 840 ]; see also Froyd v. Cook, supra, 681 F.Supp. 669, 670, fn. 2, 673-674 ).

People v. Lindley

26 Cal. 2d 780 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1945

hat, brown pants, and brown shirt. … (People v. Diaz, ante, p. 318 [ 158 P.2d 194 ]; People v. Brown, 22 Cal.2d 752 [ 141 P.2d 1 ]; People v. Waller, 14 Cal. 2d 693 [ 96 P.2d 344 ]; People v. Green, 13 Cal.2d 37 [ 87 P.2d 821 ]; People v.

Buelke v. Levenstadt

190 Cal. 684 · California Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1923

For these services appellant paid the boy, who was about nineteen years of age, eight dollars a week and his board. … (Pratt v. Browne, 135 Cal. 649, 653 [ 67 Pac. 1082 ].) As said in another ease, there must be a reasonably intelligent reference to the subject to which the legislation of the act is addressed.

Tibbetts v. Moore

23 Cal. 208 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

(Hotaling v. Cronise, 2 Cal. 63 .) … (Ferguson v. Miller, 6 Cal. 402 ; Sands v. Pfeiffer, 10 Id. 258; Union Water Company v. Murphy’s Flat Company, 22 Id. 620.)

Spear v. Reeves

148 Cal. 501 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1906

V, sec. 1) that the supreme executive power should be vested in a chief magistrate, who shall be styled the “governor” of the state of California, whose duty it shall be, among other things, to see (art. … V, sec. 7) that the laws are faithfully executed.

People v. Privitera

23 Cal. 3d 697 · California Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1979

. § 355 ) or by the state board (Health & Saf. … Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. [660], at 664-665; Minnesota ex rel. Whipple v. Martinson, 256 U.S. [41], at 45; Barsky v. Board of Regents, 347 U.S. 442, 449 .” (Whalen v.

Viner v. Untrecht

26 Cal. 2d 261 · California Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1945

Costigan, 138 Cal. 564 [72 P.178]; Breitenbucher v. Oppenheim, 160 Cal. 98 [ 116 P. 55 ]; Brown v. Spencer, 163 Cal. 589 [ 126 P. 493 ]; O’Rourke v. Skellenger, 169 Cal. 270 [ 146 P. 633 ]; Webb v. … (Brown v. Spencer, supra; Couts v. Winston, 153 Cal. 686 [ 96 P. 357 ].) Of course, the trustee of the resulting trust holds the legal title as security for the loan. (Watson v. Poore, supra; Stromerson v.

Lexin v. Superior Court

47 Cal. 4th 1050 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 2010

Both groups are subject to actions for declaratory relief or mandamus challenging their decisions (see, e.g., Bandt v. Board of Retirement (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 140 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.3d 544 ]; Board of Administration v. … (See, e.g., Finnegan v. Schrader, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th 572 [§ 1090 prohibits a district board from hiring one of the board’s own members to be the district manager]; cf. Thorpe v.

Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.

174 Cal. 156 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1916

In Peachy v. … That matter was controlled by the latter’s board of directors. The duties of Brown as treasurer of the railway company gave him no knowledge of the insolvency of the Safe Deposit Company.

People v. Hamilton

45 Cal. 3d 351 · California Supreme Court · May 19, 1988

The point defendant makes here, however, was rejected in People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 538-544 . [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], reversed on other grounds sub nomine California v. … Thus, on this record we find no Brown error. d. Easley “Factor (k)’’ Error Defendant may be understood to contend that the pre-Easley (People v.

Cowan v. Superior Court

14 Cal. 4th 367 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1996

Justice Brown argues that People v. Toro (1989) 47 Cal.3d 966 [ 254 Cal.Rptr. 811 , 766 P.2d 577 ] supports a forfeiture rule. (Cone, and dis. opn. of Brown, J., post, at p. 390.) … Justice Brown also cites In re Griffin (1967) 67 Cal.2d 343 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 431 P.2d 625 ] as consistent with a forfeiture rule. (Cone, and dis. opn. of Brown, J., post, at p. 391, fn. 4.)