Case law

Chubbuck v. Wilson

151 Cal. 162 · California Supreme Court · May 9, 1907

Drew v. … Anderson v.

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Kawamura

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 14 · California Supreme Court · Jun 3, 2004

Detroit Board of Education (1977) 431 U.S. 209 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 . . . and its progeny, including Keller v. … Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by BROWN, J.

Barthel v. Bd. of Educ. of San Jose

153 Cal. 376 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1908

(Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 , [ 22 Pac. 1042 ] ; Fairchild v. Board of Education, 107 Cal. 92 , [ 40 Pac. 26 ].) … (See Kennedy v. Miller, 97 Cal. 429 , [ 32 Pac. 558 ] ; Mitchell v. Board of Education, 137 Cal. 372 , [ 70 Pac. 180 ].)

Marr. of Green

56 Cal. 4th 1130 · California Supreme Court · Jun 24, 2013

is an expectancy, not subject to division as community property.’ ” (Brown, supra, at p. 844 , quoting Williamson v. … and Williamson v.

People v. Johnny G.

25 Cal. 3d 543 · California Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1979

After they went inside, however, the man accused Herrera of failing to return some of his clothes and beat him with a board until he crawled out onto the sidewalk. … State (1978) 264 Ark. 753,756 [ 574 S.W.2d 656,658 ] (same); Brown v. State (Tex.Crim. 1978) 576 S.W.2d 36, 42-43 (uncorroborated confession).

Horton v. Jack

115 Cal. 29 · California Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1896

Brown, Mrs. Brown “ assumed whatever indebtedness there was, and it became her indebtedness,” and that after Mr. Brown’s death he “treated it as her individual indebtedness.” … (Mellor v. Crouch, 76 Cal. 594 .)

Dittus v. Cranston

53 Cal. 2d 284 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1959

(Lundberg v. County of Alameda, 46 Cal.2d 644, 652 [ 298 P.2d 1 ].) … Patrick v.

Wheaton v. Neville

19 Cal. 41 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1861

As we said in Dana v. … (Nicholson v. Leavitt, 4 Sand. 252 ; Covanhovan v. Hart, 21 Penn. 495 ; Warland v. Kimberlin, 6 B. Mon. 608 ; Kinnard v. Adams, 11 B. Mon. 102 ).”

Staley v. State Bar

17 Cal. 2d 119 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1941

Considering the complete language of the announced rule (Salot v. … Blackacre he was induced to sell and convey to Brown through the fraud of the latter. Brown in turn sold and conveyed the land to Black, who had no notice of Brown’s fraud and paid value for the land.

Starck v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.

172 Cal. 277 · California Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1916

v. … v.

Younger v. Superior Court

21 Cal. 3d 102 · California Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1978

(Governing Board v. Mann (1977) supra, 18 Cal.3d 819, 826-828 .) … Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845-846 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ], and cases cited.)

People v. Kroeger

61 Cal. 2d 236 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1964

The telegram was addressed to the sister as “Beatrice Brown” rather than “Brunn.” (When the police officer gave Iva the sister’s name to call in January, he wrote the surname as “Brown.”) … As was held in People v.

People v. Bonin

46 Cal. 3d 659 · California Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1988

(E.g., California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538, 541 [ 93 L.Ed.2d 934, 940 , 107 S.Ct. 837, 839 ].) … People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at pp. 538-544 [discussing the mandatory sentencing language of § 190.3].)

Matter of Application of Miller

162 Cal. 687 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1912

The following eases declare these rules: Smith v. Judge, 17 Cal. 555 ; Pasadena v. Stimson, 91 Cal. 251 , [ 27 Pac. 604 ]; Darcy v. San Jose, 104 Cal. 645 , [ 38 Pac. 500 ] ; Bloss v. … Durbrow, 127 Cal. 684 , [ 60 Pac. 438 ]; Pratt v. Browne, 135 Cal. 652 , [ 67 Pac. 1082 ]; Ex parte Sohncke, 148 Cal. 267 , [ 113 Am. St. Rep. 236 , 7 Ann. Cas. 475, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 813, 82 Pac. 956 ].

Kirkeby v. Superior Court of Orange County

15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 805 · California Supreme Court · Jul 22, 2004

Opinion BROWN, J. … The Fascenellis allegedly prevented Kirkeby from seeking corporate records, canceled meetings so that Kirkeby could not elect a member to the board of directors, and appointed directors without board approval. *646 Kirkeby

Crescent Canal Co. v. Montgomery

124 Cal. 134 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1899

Brown, 64 Cal. 429 , the defendant John A. Brown’s interest had been transferred pending the litigation to Martha Brown and C. E. Thom. The court say: “They certainly had acquired the right to represent him. … In Board of Commrs. v. Younger, 29 Cal. 149 , 87 Am.

Thompson v. Lynch

43 Cal. 482 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

Lundquist v. Reusser

7 Cal. 4th 1193 · California Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1994

Relying upon language contained in our decision in Brown v. … As we recently explained in Brown v.

People v. Morgan

California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 2026

We disapprove People v. Brown, supra, 245 Cal.App.4th 140, to the extent it is inconsistent with our reasoning.3 I. … We do not find Brown persuasive.

In Re Marriage of Fithian

10 Cal. 3d 592 · California Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1974

(See Phillipson v. Board of Administration *601 (1970) supra, 3 Cal.3d 32, 44 .) … (Waite v. Waite (1972) supra, 6 Cal.3d 461; Phillipson v. Board of Administration (1970) supra, 3 Cal.3d 32 .)