Case law

Legault v. Bd. of Trs. of Roseville

161 Cal. 197 · California Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1911

Thus in Lorbeer v. … In Croley v.

People v. Mason

52 Cal. 3d 909 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1991

(See, e.g., D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 18-19 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ]; Davey v. Southern Pacific Co. (1897) 116 Cal. 325, 329 [ 48 P. 117 ].) 3. … (See People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 449 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].) *962 b.

Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District

1 Cal. 5th 937 · California Supreme Court · Sep 19, 2016

Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564, quoting Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. … Chatten-Brown & Carstens, Jan Chatten-Brown , Amy Minteer and Josh Chatten-Brown for California Preservation Foundation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

People v. Showers

68 Cal. 2d 639 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1968

Brown saw the appellant return to the area and hunt through the ivy for 15 minutes. … Brown observed when she first saw the appellant and the codefendant in front of her house. “On January 4, 1966, at about 1:15 p.m., Officer Gaida received a call to proceed to the Balboa residence of Mrs. Brown.

People v. Superior Court (Wells)

27 Cal. 3d 670 · California Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1980

(People v. Harris (1975) 15 Cal.3d 384, 389 [124 CaLRptr. 536, 540 P.2d 632 ].) … (Terry v. Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1, 24 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 908 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ].)

In Re Drake

38 Cal. 2d 195 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1951

Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, and Gail A. Strader, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. EDMONDS, J. … "The situation here is that the action of the board is nothing more than a determination that it will, at a future date, release the prisoner on parole unless intervening circumstances should prompt the board to retain him

Fulton v. Jansen

99 Cal. 587 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1893

on the following day, and received a receipt therefor from Brown. … (Osborne v. Endicott, 6 Cal. 149 ; 65 Am. Dec. 498 .)

Hardy v. Vial

48 Cal. 2d 577 · California Supreme Court · May 24, 1957

Brown, Attorney General, Lee B. Stanton, Deputy Attorney General, and George H. Chula, for Respondents. GIBSON, C.J. … (Shepherd v. State Personnel Board, ante, pp. 41, 46- 48 [ 307 P.2d 4 ].) [3b] The cases of Vargas v. Giacosa, 121 Cal.App.2d 521 [ 263 P.2d 840 ], Lorber v. Storrow, 22 Cal.App.2d 25 [ 70 P.2d 513 ], Hayashida v.

Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. Newman

30 Cal. 2d 799 · California Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1947

(Civ Code, sec. 2536; Flanagan v. Brown, 70 Cal. 254 [ 11 P. 706 ] ; Parke v. Frank, 75 Cal. 364 [ 17 P. 427 ]; Blumenthal v. Goodall, 89 Cal. 251 [ 26 P. 906 ]; 1 Cal.Jur. p. 705.) … It would be futile to appeal to the same board for damages on the ground that his removal from office constituted a breach of contract. (Nissen v.

Groves v. City of Los Angeles

40 Cal. 2d 751 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1953

Exch. v. State Board of Equalization, 26 Cal.2d 772 [ 161 P.2d 222 ]; State Farm etc. Ins. Co. v. Carpenter, 31 Cal. App.2d 178 [ 87 P.2d 867 ].) And a mere bookkeeping method cannot thwart the law. ( Industrial Indem. … Exch. v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 26 Cal.2d 772 .) Defendants seem to think that State *761 Farm Etc. Ins. Co. v. Carpenter, supra, 31 Cal.

Hadian v. Schwartz

8 Cal. 4th 836 · California Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1994

As we conclude in Brown v. … In Brown v.

Holland v. Assessment Appeals Bd.

California Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2014

(Yamaha Corporation of America v. State Board of Equalization (1998) 19 Cal.4th 1, 7 (Yamaha).) … Name of Opinion Holland v.

People v. Allen

42 Cal. 3d 1222 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1986

(k); People v. Easley, supra, 34 Cal.3d 858, 878 ; People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d 512, 541 .) In this regard, defendant put on a single character witness, his ex-girlfriend, Diane Harris. … As we observed in People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal.

People v. Barella

84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 248 · California Supreme Court · May 6, 1999

Brown (Mass. 1978) 372 N.E.2d 530 [same]; Johnson v. Dees, supra, 581 F.2d 1166, 1167 [same]; see also Fed. Rules Crim.Proc., rule 11(c), 18 U.S.C. [governing the entry of guilty pleas in federal courts]; Advisory Com. … (People v. Huynh, supra, at p. 1083 [‘We will not require trial courts to read the Board of Prison Term’s parole eligibility regulations to defendants in anticipation of a guilty plea or a Bunnell submission.’].)

Harlow v. Carleson

16 Cal. 3d 731 · California Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1976

Com. (1952) 39 Cal.2d 501 [ 247 P.2d 561 ]), and the right to continue one's trade or profession ( Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 71-72 [ 64 Cal. Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ]; Drummey v. … Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Bixby v. Pierno, supra, 4 Cal.3d 130 at p. 143, fn. 10 .)

Stockton v. Bd. of Educ. of San Jose

145 Cal. 246 · California Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1904

thoroughly acquainted by personal inspection with the work of every employee of the board, and to máke a written report to the board at least twenty days before the close of any school year, and to therein “distinctly state … of education could remove any teacher, permanent or otherwise, at will, by a *250 vote of four members of the board.

Fernelius v. Pierce

22 Cal. 2d 226 · California Supreme Court · May 18, 1943

(Brown v. Ferdon (1936), 5 Cal.2d 226, 230 [ 54 P.2d 712 ]; Hales v. Snowden (1937), 19 Cal.App.2d 366, 369 [65 P.2d 847]; Mueller v. Elba Oil Co. (1942), 21 Cal.2d *243 188, 204 [ 130 P.2d 961 ].) … Rowe v.

Sierra Club v. County of Fresno

241 Cal. Rptr. 3d 508 · California Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2018

(City of San Diego v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2015) 61 Cal.4th 945, 967.) … Chatten-Brown & Carstens, Jan Chatten-Brown, Douglas P. Carstens and Amy C.

Williams v. Superior Court

49 Cal. 3d 736 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1989

The federal district court in State of Maryland v. Brown (D.Md. 1969) 295 F. Supp. 63, 83 , reached a similar conclusion. … (P. 745, ante. ) The majority opinion never directly states that by "judicial district" it means that judicial district where the case was tried. [2] We relied on Alvarado and Brown for our decision in People v.

Maye v. Tappan

23 Cal. 306 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

In Baker v. … (Brown v. Sax, 7 Cowen, 95; Babcock v. Gill, 10 J. R. 237 ; Curtis v. Groat, 7 Id. 168; 5 Id. 348.)