Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

6,306 results

0.53s

  • (PC) Hernandez v. Martichick

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 3, 2021

    or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 25 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 26 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous where it is based on an 2 indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless. Neitzke, 3 490 U.S. at 327.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Pavao v. Unknown

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 21, 2021

    complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 2 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 3 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous where it is based on an 7 indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless. Neitzke, 8 490 U.S. at 327.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 31, 2021

    cannot survive defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 17 Since I find summary judgment appropriate for defendants on the merits, I do not reach 18 defendants’ arguments that Lamera and Aspesi are entitled to qualified … immunity. 19 Conclusion 20 Defendants have carried their burden on summary judgment by showing that at least one 21 of the elements of plaintiff’s retaliation

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) McGee v. Galager

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 16, 2024

    Cal. 2023). 1 which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from 2 such relief. … Thus, a showing of deliberate indifference rests on facts clearly evincing 26 “obduracy and wantonness, not inadvertence or error in good faith.” Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 27 312, 319 (1986).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Sherman v. Lizarraga

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 13, 2020

    Plaintiff alleges that these 7 defendants opened his mail from the O.G.I.S.3 on July 23, 2019, even though it was clearly 8 marked “legal mail.” (Id.) … To establish a violation of the right of access to the courts, a prisoner must 15 allege facts sufficient to show that: (1) a nonfrivolous legal attack on his conviction, sentence, or 16 conditions of confinement has

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Petersen v. Sims

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 7, 2021

    complaint or portion thereof if the inmate has raised claims that are legally 5 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 6 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … established constitutional right.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Choyce v. Radasa

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 16, 2020

    complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 7 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 8 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … To establish a claim of deliberate indifference arising from a delay in providing care, a 14 plaintiff must show that the delay was harmful. See Berry v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tadayyon v. Blinken

    District Court, E.D. California · May 16, 2025

    This means that the applicant is qualified “to apply 18 formally for an immigrant visa[.]” Id. … “The agency action must be pursuant to a legal obligation ‘so clearly set forth 5 that it could traditionally have been enforced through a writ of mandamus.’”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Calderon v. Bonta

    District Court, E.D. California · May 1, 2024

    complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are 25 “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] 26 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … “[A] judge may dismiss . . . claims which are ‘based on indisputably meritless legal 2 theories’ or whose ‘factual contentions are clearly baseless.’” Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Valles v. CDCR

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 4, 2021

    “[A] judge may dismiss . . . claims which are ‘based on indisputably meritless legal 13 theories’ or whose ‘factual contentions are clearly baseless.’” Jackson v. … Specifically, plaintiff alleges 16 that he is determinately sentenced and had an established earliest possible release date of 17 November 1, 2020. ECF No. 1 at 4.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Chiprez v. Spearman

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 4, 2021

    complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are 3 “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] 4 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … “[A] judge may dismiss . . . claims which are ‘based on indisputably meritless legal 8 theories’ or whose ‘factual contentions are clearly baseless.’” Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Cook v. West

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 11, 2021

    “[A] judge may dismiss . . . claims which are ‘based on indisputably meritless legal 12 theories’ or whose ‘factual contentions are clearly baseless.’” Jackson v. … To 24 state a claim, plaintiff must allege facts establishing that (1) a state actor took some adverse action 25 against him (2) because of (3) his protected conduct, and that such action (4) chilled the inmate’s 26

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (SS) Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 6, 2024

    Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir. 2008). 9 To qualify for benefits under the Social Security Act, a plaintiff must establish that 10 … Counsel also emphasizes that Plaintiff was clearly incapable of formulating a question 13 about her hand limitations to the Vocational Expert, and

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Maldonado v. Howtz

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 18, 2021

    The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous where it is based on an 11 indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless. Neitzke, 12 490 U.S. at 327. … Mere 11 negligence on the part of the prison official is not sufficient to establish liability. Farmer, 511 12 U.S. at 835. 13 IV.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Zevallos v. Allison

    District Court, E.D. California · May 19, 2021

    “[A] judge may dismiss . . . claims which are ‘based on indisputably meritless legal 28 theories’ or whose ‘factual contentions are clearly baseless.’” Jackson v. … Furthermore, plaintiff’s conclusory assertion that unspecified defendants are liable for 22 the actions of their subordinates is insufficient to establish such liability. See Ivey v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ivy v. Fresno Police Department Officers

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 12, 2023

    Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (dismissal required of in forma pauperis 17 proceedings which seek monetary relief from immune defendants); Cato v. … Section 13 981 establishes that the United States does not need a warrant to adopt funds lawfully seized by state and local law enforcement and 14 transferred to the federal government,

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Gleason v. CDCR

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 22, 2020

    complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 6 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 7 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … The plaintiff, as the moving party, bears the burden of 22 establishing the merits of his or her claims. See Winter v. Nat. Res. Def.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Banuelos v. Reyes

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 28, 2020

    complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to 19 dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 20 granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … Vineyards, 577 F.Supp. 454 (C.D.Cal.1983) (rejecting 18 plaintiffs' due process claim arising out of an eviction because “plaintiffs are unable to establish

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Hayde v. Zamora

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2020

    established law. … If he chooses to do so, he must clearly state which defendant did what and 20 when.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doe

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 17, 2026

    The Court 28 further found that Plaintiff’s state law claims under the California Fair Employment and 1 Housing Act (“FEHA”) were adequately pled, but that Defendant County was immune 2 from liability from Plaintiff … Monell Liability 10 Defendant County alleges that Plaintiff has failed to establish Monell liability. 11 Previously, this Court held that Plaintiff did not establish

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.