Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
1.02s
Morris CM Enterprises, LLC v. Wingstop Franchising LLC
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 11, 2020
WING-STOP THE WING EXPERTS & Design (in color) (2014 23 Logo) ®, registration no. 4,842,661, registered October 27, 2015; 24 v. … Menu board designs and graphics; 11 v. Product identification posters and photographs; 12 vi.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 16, 2020
See 15 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th 19 Cir. 1982).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 29, 2024
LLC,” while defendants refer to this company as “Confidant Board LLC.” … See McKeever v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 19, 2026
He timely appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on December 19, 2025. Id. While that appeal was pending, Petitioner filed a habeas petition in the U.S. … Under Zadvydas v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 12, 2026
Brown v. Bueno, No. 22 1:17-cv-01295-LJO-SKO (PC), 2018 WL 6068513, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2018) (citing and 23 quoting Wilson v. … Pauley, 2018 WL 9 5920780, at *5; see also Brown v. Pond, No. 19-35418, 2022 WL 34134, at *2 (9th Cir.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 4, 2026
.; see also U.S. v. … Co. v. Herron, 634 F.3d 1101, 1111 (9th Cir. 12 2011) (citing McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 n.1 (9th Cir. 1999)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PS) Santillan v. California Bar Examiners
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 15, 2024
The State Bar’s 20 Board of Trustees and Committee of Bar Examiners enjoy the same immunity. … Lupert v. 21 California State Bar, 761 F.2d 1325, 1327 (9th Cir. 1985) (holding that the Eleventh Amendment 22 barred the plaintiff’s suit against the State Bar Board of Governors and the California Committee 23 of
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Apr 21, 2021
No. 80) 11 PAUL WELDON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, 12 THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, AND THE … See Lopez v. 8 | Heckler, 713 F.2d 1432, 1435 (9th Cir. 1983). Weldon’s one-sentence motion does not contain 9 | any legal argument or meaningful exposition of applicable facts.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 9, 2019
“A Rule 706 expert 7 typically acts as an advisor to the court on complex scientific, medical, or technical matters.” 8 Armstrong v. Brown, 768 F.3d 975, 987 (9th Cir. 2014). … Ledford v. Sullivan, 105 F.3d 354, 359 (7th Cir. 1997). Rather, the 26 trier of fact will need to consider the prison officials’ subjective knowledge of any risks to 27 Plaintiff’s health. See Toguchi v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PC) Gonzales v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 11, 2024
See e.g., McQueen v. Brown, No. 1 are required to go to the GASRC and SMART review process. … 23 Brown, No. 3:01-cv-01351 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 21, 2024
Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 22 F.2 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 24 544, 570 (2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Delgado v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 16, 2024
Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 22 F.2 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 24 544, 570 (2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Jun 8, 2023
This case stands in contrast to Brown-Hunter v. … (citing Kaufman v. Kijakazi, 32 F.4th 843, 851 27 28 7 Brown-Hunter relies extensively on Burrell v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 26, 2019
Jan. 22, 1988)); 14 Benton–El v. Odom, 2007 WL 1812615, at *6 (M.D.Ga. June 19, 2007); Osiris v. Brown, 2005 15 WL 2044904, at *2 (D.N.J. Aug.24, 2005); see also We the People Beys and Els v. … See United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 14, 2023
Gov’t Code § 945.4 17 (generally barring suit “until a written claim therefor has been presented to the public entity and 18 has been acted upon by the board, or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board”1). … .”); Mahone v. Morgan, 135 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Schutt v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 4, 2025
Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 22 F.2 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 24 544, 570 (2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 9, 2024
Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 22 F.2 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 24 544, 570 (2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Apr 22, 2024
See Jett v. … See Clouthier v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 18, 2024
If defense counsel is unable to do so, defense counsel should inform Plaintiff that a third 23 party subpoena is required. 4 See Woodford v. … Water Board Compliance Order (ECF No. 27 at 3); 6 f.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEvalyn Ana Mendoza v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Jun 4, 2026
See Ahearn v. … (Doc. 12 at 16 (citing Lambert 22 v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1278 (9th Cir. 2020) (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 23 (9th Cir. 2015)).)
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna