Opinion

(PC) Jackson v. Shirley

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Oct 18, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.3%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

AARON JACKSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00509-JLT-EPG (PC)

9

10 Plaintiff,

11 v. ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES

TO EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

12 HEATHER SHIRLEY, et al.,

13 Defendants.

14

15 Plaintiff Aaron Jackson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

16 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

17 On August 14, 2024, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling

18 and discovery statements. (ECF No. 24). Defendants have filed theirs. (ECF No. 27). Plaintiff’s

19 scheduling and discovery statement is now due December 16, 2024. (ECF No. 31).

20 The Court has reviewed this case and Defendants’ statement. To secure the just, speedy,

21 and inexpensive disposition of this action,1 the Court will direct that certain documents that are

22 central to the dispute be promptly produced.2

23

24

25 1 See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 508–09 (9th Cir. 2008) (“We begin with

the principle that the district court is charged with effectuating the speedy and orderly administration of

26 justice. There is universal acceptance in the federal courts that, in carrying out this mandate, a district

court has the authority to enter pretrial case management and discovery orders designed to ensure that

27 the relevant issues to be tried are identified, that the parties have an opportunity to engage in appropriate

discovery and that the parties are adequately and timely prepared so that the trial can proceed efficiently

28 and intelligibly.”).

1

1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

2 1. Each party has sixty days from the date of service of this order to serve opposing

3 parties, or their counsel, if represented, with copies of the following documents

4 and/or evidence that they have in their possession, custody, or control, to the

5 extent the parties have not already done so.3 This order applies to all documents

6 including confidential documents. Moreover, the parties are required to produce

7 these documents, or lodge objections as described below, without awaiting a

8 discovery request.

9 a. Documents regarding exhaustion of Plaintiff’s claims, including 602s,

10 Form 22s, and responses from the appeals office, as well as CDCR form

11 602 HC Health Care Grievances; and CDCR form 602 Standard

12 Grievances, including OGT Grievance Log number 388426. (ECF No.

13 27 at 2).

14 b. Witness statements and evidence, if any, that were generated from

15 investigation(s) related to the event(s) at issue in the complaint, such as

16 an investigation stemming from the processing of Plaintiff’s

17 grievance(s).4

18

19

20 2 Advisory Committee Notes to 1993 Amendment to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding

Rule 26(a) (“The enumeration in Rule 26(a) of items to be disclosed does not prevent a court from

21 requiring by order or local rule that the parties disclose additional information without a discovery

request.”).

22 3 Defense counsel is requested to obtain these documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of

confinement. If defense counsel is unable to do so, defense counsel should inform Plaintiff that a third

23 party subpoena is required.

4 See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94–95 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion improves the quality

24

of those prisoner suits that are eventually filed because proper exhaustion often results in the creation of

25 an administrative record that is helpful to the court. When a grievance is filed shortly after the event

giving rise to the grievance, witnesses can be identified and questioned while memories are still fresh,

26 and evidence can be gathered and preserved.”).

The Court notes that Defendant(s) only need to produce documents such as a Confidential

27 Appeal Inquiry or a Use of Force Critique to the extent those documents contain witness statements

related to the incident(s) alleged in the complaint and/or evidence related to the incident(s) alleged in the

28 complaint that will not be provided to Plaintiff separately.

2

1 c. All of Plaintiff’s medical records related to the incident(s) and/or

2 condition(s) at issue in the case (ECF No. 27 at 2);

3 d. WSP’s Quarterly Water Reports from 2018 through the present (ECF

4 No. 27 at 3);

5 e. Water Board Compliance Order (ECF No. 27 at 3);

6 f. A copy of all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible

7 things that the disclosing party has in its possession, custody, or control

8 and may use to support its claims or defenses, unless the use would be

9 solely for impeachment.

10 2. If any party obtains documents and/or other evidence described above later in

11 the case (including, but not limited to, documents and/or other evidence from a

12 third party), that party shall provide all other parties with copies of the

13 documents and/or evidence within thirty days. The failure of a party to comply

14 with this requirement may result, among other things, in the party not being able

15 to rely on the pertinent information later in the case.

16 3. Parties do not need to produce documents or evidence that they have already

17 produced.

18 4. Parties do not need to produce documents or evidence that were provided to

19 them by the opposing party.

20 5. Parties may object to producing any of the above-listed documents and/or

21 evidence. Objections shall be filed with the Court and served on all other parties

22 within sixty days from the date of service of this order (or within thirty days of

23 receiving additional documents and/or evidence). The objection should include

24 the basis for not providing the documents and/or evidence. If Defendant(s)

25 object based on the official information privilege, Defendant(s) shall follow the

26 procedures described in the Court’s scheduling order. If a party files an

27 objection, all other parties have fourteen days from the date the objection is filed

28

3

1 to file a response. If any party files a response to an objection, the Court will

2 issue a ruling on the objection.

3

4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

>|! Dated: _ October 18, 2024 [sf hey —

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.