Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

2.33s

  • (HC) Wright v. Lizarraga

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 2019

    Houston v. … Gatlin v. Madding, 189 F.3d 882, 889 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Brown v. 18 Maass, 11 F.3d 914, 915 (9th Cir. 1993)); McGary v. Richards, 320 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Brooks v. North Kern State Prison

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 12, 2024

    Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26 (citing Atascadero 21 State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. Cal. … Dep’t. of Corrs., 554 22 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (finding California Department of Corrections and California Board 23 of Prison Terms entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity). 24 As KVSP is immune

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CDCR

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2026

    2000e, et seq., against four defendants: 1) the 26 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”); 2) Kenneth Piva, a 27 Correctional Sergeant; 3) the Merit Appeals Division of the State Personnel Board … The Court’s discretion to set aside the entry of default is “especially broad 4 || where, as here, it is entry of default that is being set aside, rather than a default judgment.” 5 || Mendoza v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CDCR

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2026

    2000e, et seq., against four defendants: 1) the 26 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”); 2) Kenneth Piva, a 27 Correctional Sergeant; 3) the Merit Appeals Division of the State Personnel Board … The Court’s discretion to set aside the entry of default is “especially broad 4 || where, as here, it is entry of default that is being set aside, rather than a default judgment.” 5 || Mendoza v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Brackett v. Anderson

    District Court, E.D. California · May 8, 2024

    See id. at 84 (finding no irreparable injury in waiting 10 until after trial to assert speedy trial claim); Brown v. … See 15 Brown, 676 F.3d at 901. 16 III.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Elder Creek Transfer & Recovery, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 17, 2020

    See Illinois v. Outboard Marine, Inc., 680 F.2d 473, 480-81 (7th Cir. 1982) (relief granted for violations of an expired permit); Sierra Club v. Aluminum Co. of Am., 585 F. … Interest Research Group of N.J. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 684 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Candler v. Diaz

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 12, 2021

    Bldg. 8 Co. v. … See Hudson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Benton v. CDCR North Kern State Prison

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 16, 2024

    Edwards v. … Id. at 646; see also Preiser v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Green v. Diaz

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 1, 2021

    See 14 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th 6 Cir. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Davis v. Portillo

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 27, 2024

    Rand v. … Portillo, an Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendant 21 Molina, and a due process clause violation against Defendant Brown.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Johnson v. Ibrahim

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 18, 2019

    See Karim-Panahi v. … That presentation and subsequent action on the 5 || claim by the board are prerequisites to suit. State v. Superior Court of Kings County (Bodde), 32 6 || Cal. 4th 1234, 1239 (2004).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CDCR

    District Court, E.D. California · May 15, 2026

    Plaintiff, ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF 11 SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND SETTING v. … See Malibu Media, LLC v. 3 Doe, 319 F.R.D. 299, 305 (E.D. Cal. 2016) (noting that a court may permit, for good cause, early 4 discovery to learn the identities of Doe defendants).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jimenez v. Buttigieg

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 9, 2024

    Two months later, Plaintiff discovered his NOM 10 position was given to a “non-Hispanic and non-brown[] employee.” (Id.) … Greenlaw v. Garrett, 59 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 1995); Vinieratos v. 13 U.S., Dept. of A.F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Athwal v. County of Stanislaus

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 29, 2022

    A, June 24, 2021 Cory Brown Deposition, Vol. III excerpt at 685:5-20.) … Brown also 14 reportedly testified that the decision regarding what charges to include in the arrest warrant 15 affidavit involved “group consensus” from, among others, Ferreira.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Gomez v. Ciolli

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 11, 2021

    Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 1 1990). Thus, “because exhaustion is not required by statute, it is not jurisdictional.” Id. … Murillo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Courll v. Weinberger

    393 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 15, 1975

    Cappadora v. Celebrezze, 356 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1966); Casey v. Cohen, 295 F.Supp. 561 (Va.1968); Winter v. Finch, 318 F.Supp. 602 (N.Y.1970); Freeman v. Cohen, 292 F.Supp. 319 (S.C.1968). … Domozik v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 5 (3d Cir. 1969); Leviner v. Richardson, 443 F.2d 1338 (4th Cir. 1971); Gaston v. Richardson, 451 F.2d 461 (6th Cir. 1971). As noted by the court in Moore v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ruben E.V. v. Warden of the Golden State Detention Facility, et al.

    District Court, E.D. California · May 29, 2026

    See, e.g., A.J.S.M.P. v. Mullin, No. 1:26-cv-03163-MWJS, 2026 WL 1190220 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2026), Danilo J.Q.E. v. Mullin, No. 1:26-cv-03370-MWJS, 2026 WL 1257548 (E.D. Cal. May 7, 2026). … As Respondents acknowledge, however, Petitioner has until June 22, 2026, to appeal the immigration judge’s decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Id. at pg. 1; see also Dkt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Michael A. Yocom v. County of Tulare

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 5, 2023

    Indeed, a 16 review of the pleadings filed by plaintiff to date show he can articulate his claims in this case. 17 See Brown v. Reif, 2019 WL 989874, at *2 (E.D. Cal. … See 3 | Allen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) O'Brien v. Diaz

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 27, 2021

    Jones v. … (“VCGCB” or “Board”), and the 6 Board acted on the claim, or the time for doing so expired. 7 “The Tort Claims Act requires that any civil complaint for money or damages first be 8 presented to and rejected

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dias v. Nationwide Life Insurance

    700 F. Supp. 2d 1204 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 19, 2010

    See Duarte v. Postal Union Life Ins. Co., 75 Cal.App.2d 557, 571 , 171 P.2d 574 (1946); Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 123 Cal.App. 185, 192 , 11 P.2d 94 (1932); Browne v. Commercial Union Assur. … Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc., 40 Cal.4th 623, 637 , 54 Cal.Rptr.3d 735 , 151 P.3d 1151 (2007); Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 7 Cal.4th 926, 931 , 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 440 , 873 P.2d 613 (1994).

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.