Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
0.66s
DeFilippo v. County of Stanislaus
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 11, 2023
( at 22–23.) 16 On August 13, 2015, Defendant Brown submitted a Ramey Warrant for 17 Plaintiffs’ arrest. ( at 23.) … Ass'n v. Klamath Med.
Cited 0 timesUnknownQuintanar, Jr. v. County of Stanislaus
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 11, 2023
( at 20.) 26 On August 13, 2015, Defendant Brown submitted a Ramey Warrant for 27 Plaintiff’s arrest. ( at 21.) … Ass'n v. Klamath Med.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAssoc. for Accessible Medicines v. Becerra
District Court, E.D. California · Feb 13, 2025
Ass’n des 2 Eleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Quebec v. Harris, 729 F.3d 937, 948 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting 3 Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth. … (quoting Healy, 49 U.S. at 336; Brown-Forman, 476 U.S. at 579).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 6, 2021
Cal. 1990). 5 “[F]ederal courts do not sit as a super zoning board or a zoning board of appeals.” … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 17, 2025
Jones v. … See Mathews v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcDow v. Shelter Financial Services LLC
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 8, 2021
Brown v. 28 1 Harris, No. 1:12-CV-01472-GSA-PC, 2013 WL 5347808, at *1 (E.D. Cal. … See Arnold v. Farmers Ins. 14 Exch., No. 18-CV-02982-KAW, 2018 WL 3777136, at *2 (N.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Mar 24, 2026
court issued an order directing respondents to file an opposition to the pending 21 motion in which respondents indicate whether this case is substantively distinguishable from the 22 court’s prior order in Ayala Cajina v. … Petitioner was previously ordered removed, but the immigration judge’s 15 decision remains pending before the Board of Immigration Appeals. (Doc. No. 7-1 at 5.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Mar 16, 2020
See 7 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 8 The Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause protects prisoners from being deprived 9 of liberty without due process of law. … Madrid, 5 889 F.Supp. at 1273–74; see also Cato v. Rushen, 824 F.2d 703, 705 (1987) (evidence relied upon 6 by a prison disciplinary board must have “some indicia of reliability”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownQuintanar, Jr. v. County of Stanislaus
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 14, 2022
County Defendants further argue Plaintiff 1 fails to state any factual allegations against Brown. (Id. at 27.) … Rodriguez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSafety-Kleen Systems, Inc. v. Alco Iron & Metal Company
District Court, E.D. California · Jul 1, 2025
See Kay v. … Board of Educ. of City of 11 | Chicago, 547 F.3d 736, 737, 739 (7th Cir. 2008). 12 In short, as the parties have resolved their claims pursuant to an enforceable contract, the 13 | Court declines to maintain
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Menchaca v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 2, 2025
Thomas v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493; see also Lambert v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAnders v. California State University, Fresno
District Court, E.D. California · Jul 22, 2021
See Pederson v. … Brown Univ., 991 F.2d 888, 1 expressly recognizes the interest of educational institutions in managing their own affairs.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLuis Antonio Duran Sanchez v. Active Field Office Director, Adelanto Field Office, et al.
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 16, 2025
Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990). … Spencer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Feb 21, 2020
Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 936 (9th Cir. 2005) (emphasis in original) 3 (citation omitted). … Brown, 422 F.3d at 943 n.18 (citations omitted); see also Andres v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 20, 2026
25 On March 9, 2026, Respondent filed a response the petition, requesting that the Court 26 either stay the proceedings or dismiss the petition without prejudice pending DHS’ appeal to the 27 Board … Prior v. Andrews, 2025 WL 2675569, at *5 (E.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBerry v. Commercial Union Ins. Companies
876 F. Supp. 1148 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 6, 1995
Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 56(c); British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 951 (9th Cir.1978). … In Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 48 Cal.3d 395 ; 402, 257 Cal.Rptr. 292 , 770 P.2d 704 (1989), the court affirmed the efficient proximate cause analysis first set forth in Sabella v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHill v. Jetblue Airways Corporation
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 8, 2019
Liability 7 discovery in Bohnel et al v. Jetblue Airways Corporation (2:18- 8 cv-00081-WBS-DMC) has been consolidated with that in Hill, et al 9 v. … As a result, JetBlue is subject to an 22 investigative hold by the Board and JetBlue’s ability to respond to plaintiffs’ discovery requests is circumscribed by federal 23 regulations.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Nov 1, 2021
See Ramirez v. … Hadsell v. Internal 18 Revenue Service, 107 F.3d 750, 752 (9th Cir. 1997); Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir 19 1993); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 6, 2021
Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 935 (9th Cir. 2005) (emphasis in original) (citing Booth 28 v. … Williams v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAnderson v. United States Forest Service
645 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 20, 1985
A final Department of the Interior decision declaring the putative Oklahoma City Placer Mining Claim null and void was issued by the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) on October 15, 1984 (Certified Administrative Record … Getty v. Andrus, supra; Crownite Corp. v. Watt, supra.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna