Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
0.34s
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 22, 2021
Rizzo v. … Code Regs. tit. 15, §§ 28 3084.1(b) (2017), 3084.7(d)(3) (2017) (repealed June 1, 2020), not a “state board.” 1 | Complaint.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 22, 2021
March 21, 2017); (2) Quair v. Board of Supervisors, et al., No. 5 1:19-cv-00902-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. July 6, 2020); and (3) Quair v. Board of Supervisors, et al., 6 No. 1:19-cv-00993-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2020). … See Andrews v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 12, 2023
Plaintiff names as defendants the California Board of Parole 12 Hearings (“BPH”); Jennifer P. … Swift v. 2 California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute 3 immunity for conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., performing 4 investigatory or
Cited 0 timesUnknownNatural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne
539 F. Supp. 2d 1155 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 23, 2008
V. … The InterNorth board accepted the recommendation and decided to commence a tender offer for Crouse-Hinds stock. Id.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCytosport, Inc. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
617 F. Supp. 2d 1051 · District Court, E.D. California · May 22, 2009
V. … Sampson v.
Cited 38 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 11, 2022
FIGUEROA; V. … Though the court has discretion to consider 7 arguments raised for the first time in objections to a magistrate judge’s findings and 8 recommendations, (Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown194 F. Supp. 3d 1038 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 8, 2016
Garcia-Valdez appealed the ruling to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA dismissed the appeal, finding that the no-risk determination was unreviewable under the INA, (ROP at 3-4.) … See Christian Gospel Church, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished(PC) Jackson v. Sacramento County Jail
District Court, E.D. California · Jan 27, 2023
See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 8 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions of the municipality, and not of 9 the actions of its employees or officers. See id. … See 24 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 11, 2023
v. … Hammler v. Haas, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48377, *3-4 (E.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 29, 2026
Plaintiff also 15 refers the Court to Vaughn v. Parker, Sahibi v. Gonzales, Brown v. Reyes, and Felder v. Macias.1 16 (Id. at 4). … A court order overruling a privilege objection 22 does not prove that a document exists in a case where the defendant asserts it does not. 23 Finally, Plaintiff cites to Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCarlos D.C. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 21, 2026
Laing v. … Ward v. Chavez, 678 10 F.3d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir. 2012). Because exhaustion is not required by statute, it is not 11 jurisdictional. Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 21, 2021
Defendant used both hands to swing the board. … She explained that the board had a nail in it, “[a]pproximately, eight to ten inches 24 down,” and that is the portion of the board that injured Leming.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 14, 2022
Id. at 1278 (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 5 F.3d 487 at 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). … See Lambert, 980 F.3d at 1278; see also Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 28, 2025
Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 936-937 (9th Cir. 2005). “To be available, a remedy 18 must be available ‘as a practical matter’; it must be ‘capable of use; at hand.’” Albino v. … Baca, 19 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Brown, 422 F.3d at 937). 20 A prisoner need not plead or prove exhaustion in a Bivens action.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 14, 2022
Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997) (citing Landis v. North 10 American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)). The party seeking the stay bears the burden of 11 establishing the need to stay the action. … Coleman v. Brown, 960 F.Supp.2d 1057 16 (E.D.Cal. 2013) (citing Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 17 (2009); Humane Soc. of U.S. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 10, 2023
Lee v. … (Id.) 3 Plaintiff counters that the Board of Supervisors delegated final decision-making 4 authority concerning disciplinary appeals to the Personnel Director, relying on Hunter 5 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 16, 2025
Kohler v. … Brown v. Lithia Motors, Inc., 6 No. 2:24-cv-01861-LK, 2025 WL 1642390, at *3 (W.D. Wash. June 10, 2025); Hash v. Rallos, 7 No. 2:20-cv-1272-TLN-AC, 2024 WL 4367660, at *5 (E.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PC) Hill v. State of California
District Court, E.D. California · Feb 14, 2025
Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State 17 Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. Cal. … Dep’t. of Corrs., 554 F.3d 18 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (finding California Department of Corrections and California Board of 19 Prison Terms entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 15, 2019
Nagrampa v. … See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna